AI 资讯

For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]

/u/obliviousphoenix2003 2026年08月14日 20:26 4 次阅读来源：Reddit r/MachineLearning

Hello, I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms. Any insight is welcome, thank you! submitted by /u/obliviousphoenix2003 [link] [留言]

本文内容来源于互联网，版权归原作者所有

查看原文

# MachineLearning

# I Built a Time Tracker Because Every Existing One Was Either Ugly or Overcomplicated

08-30

Getting Started with Excel for Data Analytics: From Basics to Data Cleaning

08-30

200 OK Does Not Mean Your Service Works

08-30

For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]

相关文章

I taught my hand gestures to run an AI coding agent

Why a ticket-availability monitor is a state machine, not a scraper

What 100% Test Coverage Missed: State Across Google ADK A2A Boundaries

# I Built a Time Tracker Because Every Existing One Was Either Ugly or Overcomplicated

Getting Started with Excel for Data Analytics: From Basics to Data Cleaning

200 OK Does Not Mean Your Service Works