标签：#AR

NYT reported Kennedy is disengaged. Kennedy's response seems to show NYT is right.

TypeScript Compile Error TS2802: Resolved with Observer Pattern by Converting Set Spread to Array.from If you're stuck implementing the observer pattern due to TypeScript compile error TS2802, this post might help. I resolved the issue with a simple conversion: changing Set spread to Array.from() . Attempts and Pitfalls While implementing the observer pattern, I encountered TypeScript compile error TS2802 when trying to spread a Set. Initially, I suspected the Set's type might be the problem, so I tried various approaches. class Observer { private subscribers = new Set < () => void > (); subscribe ( callback : () => void ) { this . subscribers . add ( callback ); } notify () { // TS2802 error occurs here for ( const callback of [... this . subscribers ]) { callback (); } } } When attempting to spread the Set into an array using [...this.subscribers] as shown above, TypeScript failed to recognize it properly, throwing an error similar to TS2802: Cannot find module '...' or its corresponding type declarations. . At first, I thought it was a library configuration issue and spent a considerable amount of time lost. The Cause In the end, the problem lay with the Set spread syntax itself. When TypeScript applies the ... spread operator to a Set, there were instances where it couldn't accurately infer the types internally. This issue can be more pronounced in certain versions or environments. The Solution To resolve this, I used the method of explicitly converting the Set spread to an array using Array.from() . class Observer { private subscribers = new Set < () => void > (); subscribe ( callback : () => void ) { this . subscribers . add ( callback ); } notify () { // Resolved by converting with Array.from for ( const callback of Array . from ( this . subscribers )) { callback (); } } } By using Array.from(this.subscribers) , TypeScript clearly recognizes the Set as an array, allowing the loop to execute correctly. The Outcome The TypeScript compile error TS2802 was cleanl

TL;DR: Your AI coding assistant is a generalist. It writes Flutter that looks right but quietly reaches for 2022 patterns. Agent Skills are a new, official way (from the Dart and Flutter teams) to hand your agent task-specific, battle-tested workflows it loads on demand. Two repos, flutter/skills and dart-lang/skills , ship ready-to-use skills for responsive layouts, routing, testing, localization, static analysis, and more. Install in one command: npx skills add flutter/skills --skill '*' --agent universal npx skills add dart-lang/skills --skill '*' --agent universal This post breaks down what they are, how they differ from rules files and MCP, the full catalog, what a real skill looks like under the hood, and whether they actually move the needle. (Spoiler: mostly yes, with one honest caveat.) Let me tell you about a fight I have almost every day. I ask my AI agent to make a screen adapt to tablets. It confidently hands me code that switches layout based on MediaQuery.orientationOf(context) . It looks clean. It compiles. It even runs . And it's wrong, because device orientation has nothing to do with how much window space your app actually has on a foldable, in split-screen, or in a resizable desktop window. The model isn't dumb. It's a generalist trained on a giant pile of Flutter code, much of it old. And here's the uncomfortable truth the Flutter team said out loud when they launched this feature: Flutter and Dart ship new features faster than LLMs can update their training data. That lag has a name, the knowledge gap , and it's why your agent keeps writing rookie Flutter with a straight face. Agent Skills are the Flutter team's answer to that gap. I've been running them on real projects, and they're one of the few "AI workflow" things in 2026 that earned the hype instead of borrowing it. Let's get into it. Table of Contents The real problem: your AI is a generalist What are Agent Skills, exactly? Skills vs Rules vs MCP: who does what The full catalog: every of

More than 350,000 spectators will watch 62 cars compete, day and night.

Whether you’re planning a backyard barbeque or a World Cup watch party, Govee’s Table Lamp Classic can help set the mood with color-changing lighting effects. Right now it’s down to just $59.99 ($20 off) at Amazon, which is its best price yet. The rechargeable lamp can last up to 30 hours on a single charge, […]

Google's Angular team has released a repository called angular/skills, focusing on Agent Skills that enhance AI coding agents' ability to write modern Angular code. The repository includes skills for generating code and scaffolding applications, reinforcing current Angular conventions. It serves as a snapshot, aiming to improve AI suggestions by providing updated context. By Daniel Curtis

After Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson stoked anger over a horrific knife attack in Belfast, a youth group linked to a global neo-Nazi movement quietly orchestrated anti-immigrant riots.

Just in time for Le Mans, BMW is pulling the cover off its new M performance concept built on the Bavarian automaker's Neue Klasse next-generation architecture. The concept is the debut of a new design language for BMW's M division, signaling a shift toward a more electrified future. The company says it is built on […]

Why isn't my 3D view transition working?! Sunkanmi tackles this frustration and offers an elegant fix for it. Why Isn’t My 3D View Transition Working? originally handwritten and published with love on CSS-Tricks . You should really get the newsletter as well.

A few days ago, I shared an article: You Don't Need Another Agent. You Need a Linter. Then I did what I do with anything I write: shared it around — a few publications, a few channels. Two reasons: First, feedback. I'd genuinely rather get roasted and fix my blind spots than stay comfortable and wrong. Second, let's be honest: reach. Every writer enjoys seeing a few more views. Most of the responses were positive. One wasn't. A publication rejected it with the reason: LOW_QUALITY Fair enough. It means there's room for improvement. Funny enough, my caffeinated 1 AM brain disagreed. Then it did what every developer does when someone says "this isn't good enough." It took that personally. So I went back and reread the article. And after the initial ego check, I realized something serious: The article talked in detail about ESLint, why it matters more in an AI-assisted world than ever. What it did not do was answer the question that actually matters: What is ESLint, how does it work, and why has half the JavaScript ecosystem quietly built its quality process around it? So let's fix that. Now, this isn't a sequel to my last piece about untangling vibe-coded code. It stands on its own — one thing, done properly . A complete teardown of ESLint: What it is How it works internally Why companies use it as a quality gate The different classes of problems it solves How plugins work How to write your own rules Where it fails Why it still beats many AI-based review systems Fair warning. This article is going to be technical. There will be syntax trees. There will be compiler concepts. There will be enough JavaScript internals to make frontend developers slightly uncomfortable. I'll try my best to keep it readable not letting it turn into another manual - which nobody finishes. Let's start with the question most people never ask. What Is ESLint Actually Doing? Most developers describe ESLint like this: It checks code for mistakes. Technically true. Also completely useless. That's

Ever watched an email agent reply to the same message twice? The recipient gets two near-identical responses seconds apart, screenshots them, and your carefully engineered assistant suddenly looks like a script with a stutter. Worse: under real load, this isn't a freak event. It's the default outcome if you haven't designed against it. The double-reply problem has three distinct causes, and each one needs its own fix. Let's walk through them. Why duplicates happen at all First cause: webhook redelivery . Nylas — like most webhook providers — guarantees at-least-once delivery. If your endpoint doesn't return a 200 fast enough, or a transient network blip eats the response, the same message.created notification shows up again. Process both, send two replies. Second: concurrent workers . Your handler probably runs on multiple instances — Lambda invocations, ECS tasks, worker processes. Two of them can pick up the same notification at nearly the same instant and both start generating a reply. Third: shared inboxes . Two agents (or an agent and a human) watching the same mailbox can both decide a message is theirs to answer. This one isn't a duplicate event at all — it's a coordination problem, and it's the hardest to patch at the application layer. Fix one: deduplicate deliveries Track which message IDs you've processed, and check before doing anything else: app . post ( " /webhooks/nylas " , async ( req , res ) => { res . status ( 200 ). end (); const event = req . body ; if ( event . type !== " message.created " ) return ; const messageId = event . data . object . id ; // Atomic check-and-set. If the key exists, bail. const alreadyProcessed = await db . processedMessages . setIfAbsent ( messageId , { receivedAt : Date . now (), }); if ( alreadyProcessed ) return ; await handleMessage ( event . data . object ); }); The check-and-set must be atomic. In Redis that's SET messageId 1 NX EX 86400 ; in Postgres it's INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING with a row-count check. G

These nifty tools combine the ease of jotting notes by hand with the power of saving them digitally.

Pinecone has announced a new integration between its Nexus knowledge engine and Microsoft OneLake, aiming to fundamentally change how enterprise AI agents access and reason over corporate data. By Craig Risi

Light up and secure your driveway, backyard, or porch with a floodlight security camera.

The repurposing of Pokémon Go data for AI training continues to draw scrutiny.

The pedal-assist can be jerky, but the throttle offers smooth, powerful acceleration.

Saturday morning. I opened Twitter and saw a tweet about the Laravel-Lang packages being compromised. My first reaction was simple: "I don't use that package." Then I opened composer.json on a project I work on and found this in require-dev : "laravel-lang/lang" : "^14.8" , "laravel-lang/publisher" : "^16.8" , That changed things. What Actually Happened The attack used laravel-lang packages as the distribution channel. And the sneaky part: the main repository branch looked completely clean. No suspicious commits, no new code. The malicious payload was pushed via git tags on forks . Most developers would not notice anything. Just a routine composer update , same as always. Once installed, the payload executed at autoload time . That means every php artisan command, queue worker, or web request running that codebase triggered the malware the moment PHP hit require_once __DIR__.'/../vendor/autoload.php' in public/index.php . Silently. No error, no red screen, nothing. The malware was a credential stealer. It searched the machine for: .env files from Laravel projects AWS access keys and session tokens SSH private keys GitHub CLI tokens NPM tokens Infrastructure secrets This is not a SQL injection that messes with your database rows. This is a key stealer that runs on your machine and takes everything it finds. Aikido Security caught it and reported it to Packagist. Packagist removed the affected versions. But if you ran composer update during that window, you were exposed. Why Supply Chain Attacks Are Different Classic Laravel security talks about SQL injection, XSS, CSRF. Those are attacks that come from outside users sending malicious input to your application. Supply chain attacks come from inside your own development process. The attacker does not need to find a vulnerability in your code. They need to compromise one developer account at one package maintainer. Every project depending on that package is now exposed. With AI tools, these attacks are getting more soph

Every developer I know has built something for themselves. A productivity tool. A habit tracker. A personal finance app. An AI that makes them smarter, faster, calmer. I did the same thing for 2 years. Then I had a conversation with someone close to me that I completely mishandled — and I realised no amount of personal productivity tools would have helped me there. The problem wasn't me, individually. The problem was the space between us. So I started asking a weird question Why has all of AI been built for individuals? Copilot helps you code faster. ChatGPT makes you smarter. Notion AI organises your thoughts. Calm helps you sleep better. Not one of them is built for what happens when two people try to understand each other. That's a massive gap. And it's one I couldn't stop thinking about. What I built Mendle — an AI-powered Relationship Intelligence platform. Not a therapy app. Not a chatbot companion. Not another journaling tool with an AI skin on top. The core idea is **shared emotional memory. Most relationship apps are built around one person's perspective. You log your feelings. You get insights. Your partner is an afterthought in the architecture. Mendle is different at the data model level. Both people contribute. Both people benefit. The AI builds an understanding of the relationship not just an individual. Over time it surfaces patterns. Communication loops. Emotional triggers. The things you keep missing because you're too close to them. The technical challenge that surprised me Building AI for two people is fundamentally harder than building it for one. Single-user AI: one context window, one set of preferences, one voice to understand. Relationship AI: two different communication styles, two different emotional vocabularies, shared history that neither person has complete visibility into, and privacy boundaries that have to be respected even between partners. The shared memory architecture was the hardest part to get right. How do you build something

The company has set aside an unusually high number of shares for retail investors. Still, experts say, you’re just getting the crumbs.

David Stein shares how to rethink large-scale architectural migrations using AI. He discusses ServiceTitan's "assembly line" pattern, explaining how decomposing legacy codebase refactoring into standardized tasks can achieve massive parallelization. He highlights the critical role of programmatically rigid validation loops to eliminate LLM hallucinations and accelerate engineering agility. By David Stein