标签：#Android

Hey DEV community! 👋 I just completely rebuilt and launched Mailfo v2.0 , an privacy-focused temporary disposable email app for Android[cite: 1, 2]. The first version got the job done, but it lacked the fluid user experience, offline reliability, and sleek UI that modern mobile apps need. I decided to tear it down and rewrite it from scratch using Jetpack Compose , Room DB , and modern Android architecture[cite: 1]. Here is a breakdown of what went into the rebuild, why privacy tools like this are essential, and what's new[cite: 1]. 🛡️ Why Use a Temporary Disposable Email? We’ve all been there: you want to download a single source-code snippet, test a new app, or sign up for a one-time service, but you don't want your primary inbox flooded with endless marketing spam[cite: 1]. A disposable email address acts as your personal buffer[cite: 1]. It protects your personal data, prevents tracker exposure, and keeps your real inbox clean[cite: 1]. ⚠️ Pro-tip: Mailfo is designed strictly for low-risk temporary email needs[cite: 1]. Do not use disposable email addresses for banking, legal accounts, or primary account recoveries[cite: 1]! 🛠️ The Tech Stack & Architecture Upgrades Moving from version 1.0 to 2.0 meant migrating away from legacy views to a fully declarative UI workflow[cite: 1, 2]. UI/UX Architecture: Built entirely with Jetpack Compose for smooth performance, a modern look, and native Light, Dark, and System theme switching[cite: 1]. Navigation: Implemented an intuitive bottom navigation system dividing the app into distinct Home, Inbox, and Profile tabs[cite: 1]. Caching & Offline Stability: Integrated a local Room SQLite database to cache inbox summaries and message data[cite: 1]. This guarantees instantaneous screen transitions without annoying network loading spinners[cite: 1]. ✨ Key Features in Mailfo v2.0 Custom & Random Email Generator: Instantly spin up a completely randomized address or build a custom email username using multiple searchable domains[ci

I'm starting a new project. It's the most ambitious thing I've attempted from a phone. The goal: an AI agent that controls a smartphone. It opens apps, navigates screens, taps buttons, types text, and completes multi-step tasks. All offline. All local. No cloud. This is Day 1 of a public build log. No fluff. Just what I'm building, how it works, and what breaks along the way. What I'm Building An autonomous AI agent that runs entirely on an Android phone. You give it a command in plain English: · "Open WhatsApp and message Mom I'll call later." · "Search for Kotlin jobs on Wellfound." · "Open my notes and summarize what I wrote yesterday." The agent parses the command, plans the steps, and executes them—opening apps, finding the right buttons, typing text, hitting send. No cloud. No API keys. Just a phone that acts on your behalf. The Stack Component Tool AI Brain Gemma 4 E4B (local, via Ollama) Runtime Termux (Linux on Android) Phone Control ADB + UI Automator Orchestration Python Why This Matters Most AI agents live in the cloud. They need internet, APIs, and someone else's server. A local agent that runs on a phone means: · Privacy: your data never leaves your device. · Offline: works even without internet. · Accessible: built for the device billions of people already own. The Hard Parts I Already See · The agent needs to "see" the screen to know where to tap. Text detection is doable. Image-based buttons are harder. · Multi-step tasks need verification. If one tap misses, the whole chain fails. · Android permissions. ADB requires developer mode. A user-facing version would need a workaround. What's Next · Day 2: Create the repo. Set up the project structure. Push the first working script. · Day 3: Get screen text detection working with OCR. · Day 4: Test a full 3-step task. This is Day 1. The repo goes live tomorrow. Follow along if you want to see something rare get built from scratch.

I just launched Kotobato on Google Play after about two and a half years of solo development. It's a word puzzle RPG — you swipe connected letters on a board to form words, and those words become attacks. Longer words deal more damage. Rarer words hit harder. I want to share what I built, why I built it this way, and what surprised me most during development. The core mechanic The board is a grid of letters. You swipe a path through connected letters to form a word. When you submit the word, it becomes an attack against the enemy. The twist: word length isn't the only thing that matters . The game has six elemental types — Animal, Nature, Knowledge, Food, Life, and Fantasy — and each word is categorized into one of these elements. Enemies have elemental weaknesses, so the right word beats a long word if you're hitting a weakness. This created an interesting design problem. In most word games, you're just maximizing point value. In Kotobato, you're making tactical choices: do I use a short word that hits a weakness, or a long word that deals raw damage? Why hiragana and English both work The game runs in both Japanese (hiragana) and English. This wasn't a late addition — it was part of the original design. Japanese hiragana is a syllabic script with 46 base characters. Because each character represents a whole syllable rather than a single phoneme, even short hiragana words feel phonetically "weighty." A 4-character hiragana word might correspond to an 8-letter English word in spoken syllables. This means the game feels different in each language — not just translated, but genuinely different. Japanese mode rewards knowledge of vocabulary that uses phonetically distinctive combinations. English mode rewards knowledge of unusual high-value words (think quixotic , ephemeral ). What I actually built 100-floor tower with escalating bosses, including historical Japanese figures like Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi Hideyoshi Gacha character system — collectible characters with d

India's largest food delivery platform processes over 1.5 million orders every single day. One missed...

Microsoft missed the boat on apps, so get ready for agents.

Google's June Android feature drop includes more scam detection, more AirDrop, and yes, more AI.

As people increasingly refuse to answer calls from unknown numbers, scammers are shifting their tactics by spoofing trusted phone numbers and using AI deepfake technology to sound like authority figures, family members, or employers.

Google is launching a new feature for its Phone app that aims to protect you from AI impersonation scams. Now, when you receive a call from a scammer that appears to be coming from the same number as one of your contacts, Phone by Google will flag the call as suspicious so you can hang […]

All tests run on an 8-year-old MacBook Air. You're transferring a batch of large files over MTP. The first one flies at 45 MB/s. Then the second file starts — and you're at 30 MB/s. The third is slower still. Nothing changed. Same cable, same device, same app. So what's happening? The Cause Is in the Protocol Itself Between every file, MTP requires a full negotiation cycle — SendObjectInfo followed by SendObject . This isn't an implementation detail you can optimize away. It's how MTP works. During that gap, a few things happen in sequence: The Android device's flash controller is still committing the previous file to storage The USB pipe is flushed and re-established for the next object The device's MTP stack is processing metadata before it's ready to receive data again The result is a speed dip at every file boundary. The longer the previous file, the longer the device needs to catch up. What I Tried Building HiyokoMTP, I went through the obvious candidates: Tokio thread pool exhaustion — sync Read/Write calls blocking async threads were a real issue. Fixing it improved overall stability, but didn't eliminate the inter-file dip. Chunk size tuning — adjusting the USB bulk transfer buffer (up to 4 MB per chunk) helped peak throughput, but not the boundary behavior. Intentional cooldown between files — adding a short pause actually helped in some cases, giving the device's flash controller time to breathe before the next transfer starts. Why It Can't Be Fully Fixed The inter-file overhead is structural. MTP was designed as a stateful, command-response protocol — not a streaming pipeline. Every file is a discrete transaction with its own negotiation. There's no mechanism to pre-stage the next file while the current one is still writing. Non-async bulk transfer pipelining (similar to io_uring or Zero Copy USB) could theoretically reduce this, but it would require deep nusb-level changes and device-side support that most Android MTP stacks don't expose. MTP vs ADB: A F

Most QR scanner libraries for React Native share the same problems — they're unmaintained, they don't support the New Architecture, or they pull in a full camera SDK for what is a single-feature module. I wanted something lean, production-grade, and built the right way. So I built it. This is react-native-qr-camera-pro — a QR and barcode scanner for React Native built entirely with native code. No JavaScript frame processing. No unnecessary dependencies. Swift on iOS, Kotlin on Android, TurboModules and Fabric throughout. Why Native-Only? The common alternative is running frame analysis in JavaScript — grabbing frames via a JS-accessible camera API and running a WASM or JS barcode decoder on them. It works, but it puts real pressure on the JS thread and limits your frame rate. With native-only processing: iOS uses AVCaptureMetadataOutput — Apple's own pipeline for detecting machine-readable codes. Frames are never copied to user space; the kernel hands off a reference to the same buffer. Android uses CameraX ImageAnalysis + ML Kit — Google's on-device barcode scanner backed by hardware-accelerated inference where available. The JS bridge is touched at most once every 500ms to deliver a result. Everything else stays native. Architecture The module is three layers: Architecture The module is three layers, each with a single responsibility: Layer What it does JavaScript / TypeScript Public API — QrCameraProView , startScanning() , stopScanning() , toggleTorch() , useBarcodeScanner() , useCameraError() Native Bridge (TurboModules + Fabric) Type-safe JSI communication between JS and native. Codegen spec drives both the iOS C++ adapter and the Android Kotlin stub. Native Platform (iOS + Android) All camera and barcode logic. AVFoundation on iOS, CameraX + ML Kit on Android. Zero JS involvement in frame processing. iOS (Swift) Class Responsibility QrCameraProSwift Owns the AVCaptureSession lifecycle BarcodeThrottler Throttle + dedup logic BarcodeTypeMapper Maps AVMetadataO

If you’ve been doing Android development for a while, you know the drill. You start a new project,...

Motorola says that recently discovered behavior, which saw some of its phones sending users to an affiliate tracking website before opening the Amazon app, was "unintended" and has been "promptly corrected." The company didn't explain how the error was introduced in the first place. "Recently, Motorola acted quickly to resolve an issue that was identified, […]