标签：#Go

I Built a Language Where AI Calls Are Sandboxed by Default The 30-line Python problem Last month I needed a script that reads server logs, classifies errors with an LLM, summarizes them, and writes a report. In Python, it looked like this: Import the SDK Initialize the client Handle the API response Parse JSON Add asyncio.gather() because sequential calls took 8 seconds Write a custom sandbox because I don't trust LLMs with exec and file writes Package it in Docker because requirements.txt always breaks on the server 80 lines later , it worked. But it felt wrong. I wasn't building logic — I was plumbing. So I asked myself: What if AI operations were language primitives, not library calls? Meet Pipe Pipe is a small runtime (~10 MB, single binary, zero dependencies) that treats summarize , translate , classify , and ask as first-class citizens — on the same level as + , sort , or len . Try it Browser Playground (WASM, no install): pipe-lang.com Source: github.com/MachuraHarry/pipe Docs: pipe-lang.com/docs

Microsoft has released TypeScript 7.0, featuring a native compiler that improves build speeds by 8x to 12x. Notable performance enhancements were evidenced in real codebases. The version lacks a stable programmatic API, anticipated in 7.1. Transitioning includes a compatibility package for existing tooling, and TypeScript remains an open-source project. By Daniel Curtis

Let's see how this "frontier community for techno-optimists" is doing ...

Table of Contents Introduction Putting the 10x Claim Into Perspective How Did We Get Here? This Was an Extensive Evaluation The Priority Was Compatibility Why Not Rust? Why Not C#? Why Go Fit the Existing Compiler A Port, Not a Simple Translation Where Does the Performance Come From? Native Execution Parallel Processing Memory Efficiency and Larger Projects The Benchmarks Memory Usage The JavaScript API Trade Off Is It Still TypeScript? The F1 Analogy Large Companies Helped Test TypeScript 7 Should You Upgrade? Final Thoughts Introduction At the end of March 2025, I published this article: Go-ing Beyond TypeScript: Microsoft Picks Go: How Will This Change the Landscape? Giorgi Kobaidze Giorgi Kobaidze Giorgi Kobaidze Follow Mar 31 '25 Go-ing Beyond TypeScript: Microsoft Picks Go: How Will This Change the Landscape? # microsoft # typescript # go # csharp 1 reaction 2 comments 12 min read At the time, Microsoft's decision to port the TypeScript compiler to Go sparked quite a bit of discussion and controversy. Many people questioned whether moving such a critical piece of the ecosystem away from TypeScript was the right choice. And boy, did Microsoft deliver what it promised: an order-of-magnitude performance improvement on some of the world's largest TypeScript codebases. The results are here, and the benchmarks speak for themselves. Putting the 10x Claim Into Perspective The phrase "10x faster" describes the scale of the improvement Microsoft has demonstrated. It does not guarantee that every codebase will become exactly ten times faster. The results depend on the size of the project, the work being performed, and the available hardware. Some projects might see a 5x improvement, while others could reach 8x, 10x, 12x, or potentially even more. No, this doesn't make every TypeScript developer a 10x developer , But it does mean that compiling a TypeScript project, loading it in an editor, and receiving diagnostics could become dramatically faster after moving to the nat

Despite predictions that AI agents could make traditional apps obsolete, developers are shipping new software faster than ever. From smarter bookmarking tools and neighborhood marketplaces to digital pen pals and nature journals, here are the latest App Store finds worth adding to your Home Screen.

Before reading this : I'd recommend skimming Part 3's "Parser" section and Part 4's summary to understand how the parser outputs a domain.Contract . This post assumes you already know the parser can turn .meph into a struct. I. A Narrative Engine's Fourth Problem: How Do You Keep Behavior Stable? The parser is written. But it's code that gets maintained long-term — requirements change, formats expand, bugs get fixed. Every change risks breaking existing behavior. The tension here is: creators depend on stable behavior, while developers depend on freedom to change. If every code change requires manually testing every known scenario, the developer will fear refactoring. If you don't test, broken behavior reaches the creator — but the creator doesn't care that you refactored the parser. The solution is to "freeze" parsing behavior: use a fixed set of contracts as watchdogs. After every change, automatically compare parse results against expectations. This is what integration tests do: take a fixed set of .meph contracts as "watchdogs," run them after every change, and verify that behavior hasn't been accidentally altered. II. Golden File Testing: Freezing Parse Results The most straightforward approach: prepare a standard contract, parse it, serialize the result to JSON, and save it. On every subsequent test run, compare the current parse result against that JSON file. The project's testdata/sample.meph is that standard contract. Here's the test flow: func TestParseSample ( t * testing . T ) { got , err := ParseFile ( "testdata/sample.meph" ) if err != nil { t . Fatalf ( "parse failed: %v" , err ) } goldenPath := "testdata/sample.golden" var want domain . Contract if err := loadGolden ( goldenPath , & want ); err != nil { // Golden file doesn't exist — generate it automatically saveGolden ( goldenPath , got ) t . Log ( "Golden file generated. Please review and re-run the test." ) t . FailNow () } // Compare got and want if diff := cmp . Diff ( want , got ); diff != ""

📅 เขียนเมื่อ: กรกฎาคม 2026 ⚠️ ตรวจสอบข้อมูลจาก Go Specification, APL documentation, และบันทึกของผู้พัฒนา ถ้าคุณเขียน Go มาระยะหนึ่ง คุณคงเคยเห็น iota — เจ้า identifier ประหลาดที่ไม่มีใครรู้ว่ามันคืออะไรตอนเจอครั้งแรก const ( Monday = iota + 1 // 1 Tuesday // 2 Wednesday // 3 ) มันไม่ใช่ keyword, ไม่ใช่ type, ไม่ใช่ function — มันคืออะไรกันแน่? และที่สำคัญ — ทำไมต้องชื่อ iota ? คำตอบพาเราย้อนกลับไปถึงปี 1962 — ถึงนักคณิตศาสตร์ชาวแคนาดาคนหนึ่ง และภาษาโปรแกรมมิ่งที่เปลี่ยนโลก iota คืออะไรใน Go ใน Go spec — iota คือ predeclared identifier ที่ใช้ เฉพาะใน const declaration เท่านั้น มันทำสิ่งเดียว: นับเลขให้อัตโนมัติ const ( _ = iota // 0 (skip) KB = 1 << ( 10 * iota ) // 1 << 10 = 1024 MB // 1 << 20 = 1,048,576 GB // 1 << 30 ) ค่า iota เริ่มที่ 0 และเพิ่มทีละ 1 ทุกครั้งที่เจอบรรทัดใหม่ใน const block — แม้ว่าบรรทัดนั้นจะไม่ได้ใช้ iota ก็ตาม สิ่งที่ทำให้ iota ทรงพลังคือมันเป็น expression (ไม่ใช่แค่ตัวเลข) — คุณเอาไปคูณ บวก ลบ shift ได้หมด const ( Read = 1 << iota // 1 << 0 = 1 Write // 1 << 1 = 2 Execute // 1 << 2 = 4 ) นี่คือวิธีมาตรฐานในการสร้าง enum, bitmask, และ constant series ใน Go — ทั้งหมดด้วย keyword เดียว iota — อักษรกรีกตัวเล็กที่สุด ก่อนจะเป็นชื่อใน Go — ιώτα (iota) คืออักษรตัวที่ 9 ของกรีกโบราณ: ι มันคืออักษรที่ เล็กที่สุด ในภาษากรีก — แค่เส้นตรงหนึ่งเส้น ไม่มีหาง ไม่มีขีด ในพระคัมภีร์ไบเบิล มีวลี famous: "not one iota" — แปลว่า "ไม่แม้แต่นิดเดียว" — เพราะ iota คือสิ่งที่เล็กที่สุด และมันคือชื่อที่สมบูรณ์แบบสำหรับสิ่งที่ "เพิ่มทีละหนึ่ง" จุดเริ่มต้น — APL และ Kenneth Iverson นักคณิตศาสตร์ผู้สร้างภาษา ปี 1962 — Kenneth E. Iverson ตีพิมพ์หนังสือ "A Programming Language" (ที่มาของชื่อ APL) Iverson เป็นนักคณิตศาสตร์ชาวแคนาดา (ต่อมาได้ Turing Award ปี 1979) — เขาไม่ได้แค่ออกแบบภาษาใหม่ แต่ปฏิวัติวิธีคิดเรื่อง programming แทนที่จะเขียน for i = 1 to 10 — Iverson คิดว่า programming ควรเหมือนคณิตศาสตร์: สั้น, สัญลักษณ์, และทรงพลัง เกิดเป็น ⍳ (iota) ใน APL, Iverson สร้าง operator ⍳ — เรียกว่า iota — ที่ทำสิ่งเดียว: สร้างลำดับเลข ⍳ 5 → 1 2 3 4 5 ⍳ 10 → 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

Android Headlines claims to have the specs and price for the entire Pixel 11 lineup. What the site shared basically lines up with everything else that we've heard in the lead-up to the August 12th event. The Pixel 11 is expected to get a $100 price hike, starting at $899, but will come with 256GB […]

Despite a lawsuit from xAI, a Minnesota ban on apps that allow users to “nudify” images can move forward.

While struggling to understand channels in go, I would try out many things in my sandbox repository. I encountered deadlock errors and stuff about go routes being asleep. I came to understand that the order of execution played a role and that with unbuffered channels you need a sender and a receiver ready at the same time (kind of). I wrote a short article on my blog site about the experience The Unbuffered Channels In Go Lesson I Think Has Finally Clicked for Me 🤷🏽‍♂️

GitHub热门项目 | GitHub Stacked PRs | Stars: 696 | 67 stars today | 语言: Go

Reddit may still be considering ending its licensing deal with Google.

I Learned Go in 3 Weeks. Yesterday, My Code Merged into k9s. From zero Go experience to a...

The Chaotic Bug: The Infinite State Loop & Memory Leak In a real-time clinical AI health suite, high-frequency telemetry streaming (such as 60Hz ECG canvas updates) demands surgical precision. During heavy load testing, our frontend performance suddenly degraded: CPU thread usage hit 98%, heap memory ballooned to over 1.4 GB, and DOM frame rendering dropped to single digits. The Root Cause A subtle React useEffect hook listening to the incoming WebSocket data stream contained the state setter inside its dependency array: // ❌ THE CHAOTIC BUG (Caused infinite state sync re-renders) useEffect(() => { const sub = ecgDataStream.subscribe((point) => { setEcgPoints((prev) => [...prev, point]); // Triggered full tree re-render on every frame! }); return () => sub.unsubscribe(); }, [ecgPoints]); // Including state array in deps created recursive re-subscription storm! Every incoming telemetry frame pushed new state, triggering an immediate top-level component re-render, which re-subscribed to the stream and accumulated thousands of orphaned event listeners. Best Use of Sentry: Pinpointing & Clearing the Lineup Sentry Performance Tracing and Sentry Error Tracking proved invaluable in isolating this silent killer: Transaction Waterfalls: Sentry flagged transaction spans render_ecg_canvas exceeding the 500ms threshold (averaging 842ms). Breadcrumb Trail: Sentry logged a rapid succession of CanvasRenderer memory allocation warnings (>64MB/sec). Issue Grouping: Sentry grouped 14,000 React Maximum update depth exceeded exceptions into a single actionable alert. The Fix & Restored Harmony We refactored the streaming engine to bypass React state re-renders entirely for frame accumulation, employing a zero-allocation useRef buffer paired with a requestAnimationFrame render cycle, and instrumented Sentry Breadcrumbs: // ✅ THE RESILIENT FIX (Zero-allocation ref buffer + Sentry Breadcrumb) import * as Sentry from '@sentry/react'; const bufferRef = useRef([]); useEffect(() => { Sentry.a

The company appears to have built new laptops and a 2-in-1 for the Googlebook initiative.

Someone in Cuba or Iran can keep installing APKs with no new restrictions, but devs will suffer.

Every esports team captain has done this by hand at least once: open Discord, scroll through a dozen "I can play Thursday after 8" messages, cross-reference them against who plays Tank versus DPS, remember that one of your DPS is actually a sub, and try to assemble a starting five that can actually scrim tonight. It takes fifteen minutes, you get it slightly wrong, and you do it again the next day. I build Supatimer , a free Discord bot for competitive gaming teams, and "generate the lineup for me" was the single most requested feature. This post is about how the lineup optimizer actually works, why it is genuinely AI (and not in the marketing sense), and where a large language model fits in versus where it absolutely does not. "AI" is doing a lot of work in this industry Half the Discord bots on the market slapped "AI" on their landing page the week ChatGPT launched. Usually it means there is a chatbot command somewhere that proxies to an LLM. That is fine, but it is not what your team needs when it is 7:45pm and you have a scrim at 8. There are two honest definitions of AI worth separating: Search and optimization - the classical branch. Constraint satisfaction, combinatorial optimization, planning. This is the part of AI that solves "given these rules and these resources, find the best valid arrangement." Machine learning / LLMs - the statistical branch. Pattern recognition, generation, extraction from unstructured text. The lineup problem is squarely a problem for the first kind. So that is what I built first. The lineup problem, stated precisely Strip away the gaming context and a lineup is a constrained assignment problem: You have N players , each with a set of roles they can fill (Tank, DPS, Support, IGL, and so on). Each player has an availability signal for a given time block (available, maybe, unavailable). Each player has a roster status (starter, substitute, trial). The game defines a required composition : Overwatch 2 wants 1 Tank, 2 DPS, 2 Support. Va

The Squid is a new scientific machine : One of the technological breakthroughs was the onboard use of a spinning wheel confocal microscope, nicknamed the Squid, which uses lasers to scan microscopic details of how organisms are put together. “That opens up a whole new world of exploring. We could see cells interacting with each other, exchanging material and building skeletons. And we could do that live on the ship, when usually it takes a couple of weeks of staining and mounting to see anything,” Osborn said. The expedition discovered thirty-one new marine species in two weeks. The article doesn’t say if any of them were new species of squid...

A tool that allowed anyone to generate fake AI-generated imagery and superimpose it over real Google Earth maps quickly spurred backlash.

Google has shut down Google Earth feature it launched Thursday that allowed users to edit satellite images with text prompts using AI. The tool essentially let users create AI deepfakes of the real world using text prompts; Digital Digging's Henk van Ess, for example, intentionally generated images adding things like refugees near the Mexican border […]