标签：#Go

The differences between the iPhone and Android show up when you connect them to your car, as well.

Dario Amodei is pushing back against the idea that he's been painting an overly pessimistic picture of AI.

This is a submission for Weekend Challenge: Dog Days Edition What I Built A game where...

1. What Is Android Developer Verification and Why Google Introduced It In August 2025, Google quietly announced a major policy change called Android Developer Verification . Starting September 2026 (first in select countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand, then rolling out globally), every developer whose app is installed on certified Android devices must register with Google. This is not limited to apps distributed through the Google Play Store. It applies to all apps — including those sideloaded from websites, shared via APK files, distributed through F-Droid, or even internal company tools and hobby projects. Google’s official reason is “improved security and accountability” — to stop repeat malware developers. However, the implementation goes far beyond that. It creates a central registry controlled entirely by Google, where every person or organization building Android software must identify themselves. 2. How the Verification Process Actually Works (Step-by-Step Details) To get their apps installable on most Android phones, developers must complete the following: Create or use a Google Play Console developer account. Pay a registration fee (standard accounts are around $25, with possible additional costs). Agree to Google’s lengthy Terms and Conditions without negotiation. Submit government-issued identification (passport, driver’s license, or national ID). Provide proof of ownership of their app’s signing key (the private key used to sign APKs). List all current and all future application package names (com.example.myapp) they plan to use. Once registered and verified, apps from that developer can install normally. If a developer does not register or fails verification, their apps will be silently blocked by Google Play Protect on certified devices worldwide. This process turns what was once a simple “build and share APK” workflow into a permission-based system where Google acts as the gatekeeper for the entire Android ecosystem. 3. The “Adva

The woman claimed that AI tools are "taking everyday life and turning it into child sexual abuse."

Building a Restaurant Reservation System with Node.js, Express & MongoDB - A Beginner's Guide Tags: #nodejs #express #mongodb #webdevelopment #tutorial #beginner Introduction Hey everyone! 👋 This is my first Dev.to post, and I'm excited to share what I've been learning. As a 5th-semester CS student, I've been diving deep into full-stack web development, and today I want to walk you through building a Restaurant Reservation System – a real project I built that taught me so much about backend architecture and database design. If you're just starting with Node.js, Express, and MongoDB, this post is for you! What We'll Build A simple but functional restaurant reservation system where: Users can browse available time slots Users can book a table for a specific date and time Admin can manage reservations Weekly scheduling (Monday-Sunday) 2-hour time slots Tech Stack: Backend: Node.js + Express Database: MongoDB Frontend: React + Tailwind CSS (we'll focus on backend in this post) Prerequisites Before we start, make sure you have: Node.js installed MongoDB running locally or MongoDB Atlas account Basic JavaScript knowledge VS Code or any code editor Project Setup 1. Initialize the Project mkdir restaurant-reservation-system cd restaurant-reservation-system npm init -y 2. Install Dependencies npm install express mongoose cors dotenv npm install nodemon --save-dev 3. Create Project Structure restaurant-reservation-system/ ├── models/ │ └── Reservation.js ├── routes/ │ └── reservations.js ├── config/ │ └── db.js ├── .env ├── server.js └── package.json Step 1: Set Up MongoDB Connection config/db.js const mongoose = require ( ' mongoose ' ); const connectDB = async () => { try { await mongoose . connect ( process . env . MONGODB_URI ); console . log ( ' MongoDB connected successfully ' ); } catch ( error ) { console . log ( ' MongoDB connection failed: ' , error ); process . exit ( 1 ); } }; module . exports = connectDB ; Step 2: Create Reservation Model models/Reservation.js co

Introduction Your program keeps creating objects. Every function call, every loop iteration, every parsed JSON response produces new ones. You don't manually delete most of them. You've never written a line of code that says "free this memory now." And yet your application doesn't immediately exhaust all available RAM and crash. So who cleans everything up? The answer is a garbage collector, a piece of the runtime that runs quietly in the background, deciding what your program no longer needs and reclaiming that memory for future use. Most developers interact with it only when something goes wrong: an unexpected pause, a memory leak, or an out-of-memory error that shouldn't be happening. Understanding how it actually works turns those confusing moments into solvable problems. And as a bonus, the core algorithm is simple enough to build yourself. We'll do that by the end of this article. -- 1. The Memory Problem Every time your program creates an object, the runtime allocates a chunk of memory to hold it. A string, a dictionary, a class instance: they all need memory, and that memory has to come from somewhere. The somewhere is a region called the heap , a pool of memory that the program draws from as it runs. When you create an object, the runtime finds a suitable slot in the heap and reserves it. When that object is no longer needed, that slot should be freed so it can be used for something else. In languages like C, you manage this manually. You allocate memory when you need it, and you free it when you're done. This gives you control, but it creates two classic failure modes. Free memory too early and you have a dangling pointer, a reference to memory that's now being used for something else. Forget to free it at all and you have a memory leak: the program slowly consumes more and more memory until it runs out. Automatic memory management exists to eliminate these failure modes. Instead of relying on the programmer to track every allocation and release, the runti

Google has launched Gemini 3.7 Flash, providing significant updates for coding, automation, and the development of autonomous agents. The company reduced production pricing to help businesses deploy these tools more affordably. This release comes only three weeks after the previous version, signaling a faster pace for developer-focused updates. Accelerated development cycles and cost reduction strategies The introduction of Gemini 3.7 Flash highlights a shift in how technology providers manage their product lineups. Google is prioritizing rapid iteration for its Flash series, which serves as a high-speed tool for developers. This latest version arrived less than a month after its predecessor, showing the company responds quickly to user feedback. Engineers designed this model to handle software engineering tasks and complex, multi-step workflows with higher precision. Pricing for the new model sits at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens. This represents a reduction of approximately fifty percent compared to the prior version. By lowering the financial barrier, Google aims to make large-scale production deployments more sustainable for businesses. The company describes this version as a reliable workhorse capable of following instructions with greater accuracy than previous iterations. While the Flash series moves quickly, the more advanced Pro models follow a different path. These high-end models, designed for the most difficult reasoning tasks, see less frequent updates. During recent financial discussions, leadership at the company did not provide a specific timeline for the next Pro release. This indicates a growing gap between fast, cost-effective models and the slower development of premium intelligence tiers. Industry trends in model tiering Other companies in the industry are following similar patterns by separating their offerings into distinct categories. For example, some competitors have launched high-end variants alongside

Fascinating video about searching for life undersea. The video basically makes the point that our bright white searchlights are scaring everything away, and that red light is more neutral. That, plus bait to attract sea creatures, is teaching us a lot about what’s going on down there. Lots of footage of giant squid, and speculation about the colossal squid. Worth watching. As usual, you can also use this squid post to talk about the security stories in the news that I haven’t covered. Blog moderation policy.

Google has a week to make it easier to find third-party app stores.

What happens when you stop picking a stack and let each protocol pick one for you. Every engineering team has a stack. Ours has seven, and we did not decide on any of them. Nevai is a self-hosted, end-to-end encrypted workspace built on Matrix. Part of it is a set of bridges — 25 of them — connecting Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Messenger, Instagram, Slack, Google Chat, LINE, WeChat, KakaoTalk, Skype, GroupMe, SMS, email, IRC, XMPP, Zulip, Mattermost, Revolt, Mumble, QQ, X and LinkedIn into one place. We started out intending to standardise. We ended up with this: Language Bridges Go 12 TypeScript 5 Python 4 JavaScript 1 Kotlin 1 PLpgSQL 1 Slice 1 Nobody sat in a room and chose that distribution. It is what you get when the protocol decides. Go wins where the protocol was reverse-engineered WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, X, WeChat, QQ, Skype, LinkedIn, email. Twelve bridges, and the reason is the same every time: the mature libraries for those protocols are written in Go. That is not a claim about Go being a better language. It is a claim about where a decade of reverse-engineering effort happens to live. If you want to speak WhatsApp's protocol without running a browser session, you use what exists, and what exists is Go. Look at what leaks in around the edges and the picture gets sharper: Signal is 86% Go and 13% C — the C is libsignal, and you do not reimplement libsignal. iMessage is 96% Go and 3% Objective-C — because iMessage runs on macOS, and at some point you have to talk to the operating system in its own language. Those percentages are the honest part. A bridge is mostly your code and a small amount of somebody else's, and the small amount is usually the part that matters most. Python wins where the API is boring Google Chat, Zulip, KakaoTalk, LINE. Documented HTTP APIs, JSON in and JSON out, no protocol archaeology required. There is no performance argument here. These bridges are not throughput-bound; they

Arguably the coolest new photo feature for the Pixel 11 lineup is Google's new Camera Looks, which process image data differently at the sensor level to produce photos that don't have that "smartphone" look. The result is new styles like "Digi," which mimics the style of photos taken by older digital cameras. But to use […]

Google will now allow you to remove visible watermarks from the images, videos, and music made with AI tools. With the update, you can toggle off a new "Media watermark" setting in Gemini and Google's AI video generator, Flow. When toggled off, Google will remove the "sparkle" watermark that appears in the bottom-right corner of […]

Turning off this setting won't affect invisible benchmarks used to identify an AI generated file.

This is a current list of where and when I am scheduled to speak: I’m speaking, signing books, and participating in panel discussions at LAcon V in Anaheim, California, USA. My full schedule is here . I’m speaking online (via Zoom) at a League of Women Voters event on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at 5 PM ET. I’m speaking at Elevate Festival in Toronto, Canada. The conference runs September 22–24, 2026; my talk is on Wednesday, September 23. I’m speaking at CanSecWest 2026 in Vancouver, Canada. The conference runs September 30–October 1, 2026; the time of my talk is TBD...

Third-party app stores are about to become more visible in Google Play.

Natural gas prices could triple in some parts of the U.S., which could saddle hyperscalers with massive bills to power their AI data centers.

This essay was written with Nathan E. Sanders, and originally appeared in The Guardian . OpenAI, and then Anthropic , were each formed by AI developers who feared unrestrained corporate AI development—specifically, that companies like Google and Meta would steer the technology towards deleterious, maybe even catastrophically unsafe, outcomes for society. Their founders proclaimed that their new labs, uniquely, could be trusted to develop the technology in humanity’s best interest. But each, in turn, were themselves co-opted by the same market incentives, themselves becoming corporate behemoths zealously guarding future investor value rather than the public interest...

Apple and Google still aren't done facing Epic Games in court.

Rate limiting sounds like a solved problem until you actually implement one and watch it fail in a way your load test didn't predict: legitimate bursts getting rejected, or a limiter that lets through 2x its stated limit at window boundaries. The failure modes are specific enough that it's worth working through the two dominant algorithms — token bucket and sliding window — with actual code, not just the diagrams. The problem with fixed windows The naive approach almost everyone reaches for first is a fixed window counter: pick a window size (say, 60 seconds), count requests in that window, reset the counter when the window rolls over. import time class FixedWindowLimiter : def __init__ ( self , limit : int , window_seconds : int ): self . limit = limit self . window_seconds = window_seconds self . count = 0 self . window_start = time . time () def allow ( self ) -> bool : now = time . time () if now - self . window_start >= self . window_seconds : self . window_start = now self . count = 0 if self . count < self . limit : self . count += 1 return True return False This is simple and cheap, and it's also broken in a specific, exploitable way. Say the limit is 100 requests/minute. A client can send 100 requests in the last second of window N, then another 100 in the first second of window N+1. That's 200 requests in roughly two seconds, well within the letter of "100/minute" as the code enforces it, but nowhere near the spirit of it. This is the classic boundary-burst problem, and it's the reason fixed windows get replaced once traffic is adversarial or bursty enough to find the seam. Sliding window: smoothing the boundary A sliding window log fixes this by tracking actual timestamps instead of a single counter, and counting how many fall within the trailing window at the moment of the request: from collections import deque import time class SlidingWindowLogLimiter : def __init__ ( self , limit : int , window_seconds : float ): self . limit = limit self . window_seco