标签：#an

When engineers discuss quantum computing, the conversation usually focuses on future supercomputers cracking traditional encryption passwords in a matter of seconds. As a systems architect who spends my days building distributed platforms, which are networks of independent cloud servers working together as a single application, I see a different, highly practical challenge taking shape. The transition to quantum-resistant security is not simply a theoretical math problem. It is an infrastructure challenge that will directly impact network throughput, memory usage, and messaging efficiency across global cloud environments. To protect sensitive enterprise records and business platforms against future quantum threats, security organizations are transitioning to Post-Quantum Cryptography. This field involves building new mathematical algorithms that quantum computers cannot easily solve. However, these stronger defense mechanisms come with a major trade-off in size. Traditional cryptographic signatures, which are digital verification stamps used to prove that a data message comes from an authentic sender and was not altered, are remarkably small. An older, standard signature might only take up sixty bytes of memory. By comparison, a quantum-safe signature can easily require several thousand bytes. In a simple website, adding a few extra kilobytes to a security header goes unnoticed. But modern cloud infrastructure relies heavily on event-driven architecture, a design strategy where dozens of microservices communicate by constantly publishing tiny, real-time updates to shared message queues. In these systems, the actual business payload might only be a small status change containing twenty bytes of text. If the quantum security stamp attached to that message is three thousand bytes, the overhead of the security layer completely outweighs the actual data being sent. When security footprints expand by orders of magnitude, the physical realities of computer networking take

Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility, your hub for the future of transportation and now, more than ever, the role AI is playing in it.

These portable vacuums make quick work of snack crumbs, tracked-in dirt, pet hair, and the mysterious debris beneath your seats.

As more big companies invest in glasses that record audio and video and pack AI on board, privacy concerns are only getting louder.

This guide is a collection or a summary on how to install and use a footprint of Apache Hadoop. I tried to follow an old version 2.7.1 guide that I created few years ago and adjusted this to use the latest version. Apache Hadoop 3.5.0 is used below; check the Apache releases page before future installations. These instructions target Linux (Ubuntu/Debian) for development or testing. Production clusters need Kerberos, network controls, encryption, monitoring, backups, and an upgrade plan. Do not expose HDFS or YARN ports to the internet. Native single-node installation Prerequisites sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install -y openjdk-17-jdk openssh-client openssh-server pdsh curl tar java -version Hadoop requires Java and SSH; pdsh is recommended by the current Apache single-node documentation. Find JAVA_HOME if needed: readlink -f "$(command -v java)" | sed 's:/bin/java::' Download and install Pin the version for repeatable installs and verify Apache's SHA-512 checksum: export HADOOP_VERSION=3.5.0 cd /tmp curl -fLO "https://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}/hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}.tar.gz" curl -fLO "https://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}/hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}.tar.gz.sha512" sha512sum -c "hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}.tar.gz.sha512" sudo tar -xzf "hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}.tar.gz" -C /opt sudo ln -sfn "/opt/hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}" /opt/hadoop sudo chown -R "$USER":"$USER" "/opt/hadoop-${HADOOP_VERSION}" Add this to ~/.bashrc, adjusting JAVA_HOME if necessary: export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64 export HADOOP_HOME=/opt/hadoop export HADOOP_CONF_DIR="$HADOOP_HOME/etc/hadoop" export HADOOP_HDFS_HOME="$HADOOP_HOME" export HADOOP_YARN_HOME="$HADOOP_HOME" export HADOOP_MAPRED_HOME="$HADOOP_HOME" export PATH="$PATH:$HADOOP_HOME/bin:$HADOOP_HOME/sbin" Then load and verify it: source ~/.bashrc sed -i "s|^# export JAVA_HOME=.*|export JAVA_HOME=${JAVA_HOME}|" "$HADOOP_HOME/etc/hadoop/hadoop-env.sh" had

📅 เขียนเมื่อ: กรกฎาคม 2026 ⚠️ อ้างอิงจากเอกสารต้นฉบับของ Bell Labs และบันทึกของผู้พัฒนา ถ้าผมถามว่า "ระบบปฏิบัติการที่เจ๋งที่สุดในโลกคืออะไร" — คุณคงตอบ Linux, macOS, หรือ Windows แต่ถ้าถาม Ken Thompson และ Dennis Ritchie — สองคนที่สร้าง Unix ขึ้นมา — พวกเขาจะตอบว่า Plan 9 Plan 9 คือระบบปฏิบัติการที่ Bell Labs สร้างขึ้นในช่วงปลายยุค 80 ถึงต้นยุค 90 โดยทีมเดียวกับที่สร้าง Unix แต่มันไม่ใช่แค่ "Unix เวอร์ชันใหม่" — มันคือการเริ่มต้นใหม่ทั้งหมด และถึงแม้วันนี้แทบไม่มีใครใช้ Plan 9 — แนวคิดของมันแทรกซึมอยู่ในทุกระบบปฏิบัติการที่คุณใช้อยู่ จุดเริ่มต้น — "Unix เริ่มแก่แล้ว" ปัญหาที่ Unix สะสมมา Unix เกิดในปี 1969 — ตอนนั้นคอมพิวเตอร์คือเครื่องเดียวที่มี terminal ต่อพ่วง พอยุค 80 มาถึง โลกเปลี่ยน — network กลายเป็นเรื่องปกติ, graphics เริ่มสำคัญ, distributed computing เริ่มเกิด แต่ Unix ไม่ได้ถูกออกแบบมาเพื่อสิ่งเหล่านี้ มันถูก patch, extend, retrofit — จนกลายเป็นระบบที่ซับซ้อนเกินกว่าที่ผู้สร้างจะภูมิใจ Ken Thompson เคยพูดประมาณว่า: "Unix เริ่มต้นด้วยความเรียบง่าย แต่มันค่อย ๆ สะสมความซับซ้อนเข้าไปเรื่อย ๆ — ถึงเวลาที่ต้องเริ่มใหม่" ทำไมต้องชื่อ Plan 9 ชื่อ "Plan 9" มาจากหนัง B-movie สุดคลาสสิกเรื่อง "Plan 9 from Outer Space" (1959) ของ Ed Wood — ที่ได้ชื่อว่าเป็น "หนังที่แย่ที่สุดตลอดกาล" แต่ชื่อนี้ไม่ได้หมายความว่า OS นี้แย่ — มันคือมุกวงในของทีม Bell Labs ที่ชอบตั้งชื่อแปลก ๆ (Unix เองก็เป็นมุก — มันล้อ Multics) หัวใจของ Plan 9 — "ทุกอย่างคือไฟล์" จริง ๆ จาก Unix สู่ Plan 9 — ทำให้สุดทาง Unix มีแนวคิด famous: "everything is a file" filesystem เป็นไฟล์ → /home/user/document.txt devices เป็นไฟล์ → /dev/sda , /dev/tty processes เป็นไฟล์ → /proc/1234 แต่มันมีข้อยกเว้น — network sockets, graphics, window system — สิ่งเหล่านี้ไม่ใช่ไฟล์ใน Unix Plan 9 เอาแนวคิดนี้ไป สุดทาง — ใน Plan 9, ทุกอย่างคือไฟล์ ไม่มีข้อยกเว้น 9P — โปรโตคอลเดียวที่เชื่อมทุกอย่าง หัวใจของ Plan 9 คือ 9P — โปรโตคอลที่ทำให้ทุกอย่างสื่อสารกันผ่าน filesystem หน้าต่าง GUI → mount เป็นไฟล์ network connection → mount เป็นไฟล์ เครื่องอื่นใน network → mount เป็นไฟล์ ลองนึกภาพ: คุณ ls ดูไฟล์ในเครื่องคนอื่นได้เหมือน

Originally published on tamiz.pro . MongoDB aggregation pipelines are powerful tools for processing and transforming data directly within the database. However, when dealing with large datasets, poorly optimized pipelines can become a significant performance bottleneck. This deep-dive explores advanced strategies and best practices to ensure your large-scale MongoDB aggregation pipelines run efficiently and effectively, transforming raw data into actionable insights without grinding your system to a halt. Table of Contents Understanding the Aggregation Pipeline Lifecycle The Critical Role of Indexing Indexes for $match and $sort Stages Compound Indexes and Covered Queries Partial Indexes for Specific Workloads Strategic Stage Ordering Pushing $match and $project Early Leveraging $sort and $limit Together Memory Management and Disk Spills allowDiskUse and its Implications Strategies to Minimize Disk Spills Leveraging the Query Optimizer and Explain Plan db.collection.explain() Interpreting Explain Plan Output Sharding Considerations for Aggregations Shard Key Design for Aggregation Workloads Targeted vs. Broadcast Aggregations Advanced Optimization Techniques Using $lookup for Joins and its Performance Impact Optimizing $group Stages Batching and Incremental Aggregations Production Best Practices Frequently Asked Questions Understanding the Aggregation Pipeline Lifecycle Before diving into optimizations, it's crucial to understand how MongoDB processes aggregation pipelines. An aggregation pipeline is a sequence of stages that process documents from a collection. Each stage performs an operation on the input documents and outputs a stream of documents to the next stage. This stream-based processing is key to its efficiency, but it also means that the output of one stage directly impacts the performance of subsequent stages. The MongoDB query optimizer attempts to reorder certain stages for efficiency, but it's not omniscient. Your strategic design choices profoundly

Green offered a remarkable apology, saying that "the level of dopamine that I've been getting from interacting with LLMs ... is not healthy for me or good for the world."

We just bumped four dependencies in the app. Here's what each one brings. implementation 'androidx.constraintlayout:constraintlayout:2.2.2' implementation platform ( 'com.google.firebase:firebase-bom:34.17.0' ) implementation 'io.intercom.android:intercom-sdk:18.6.0' implementation 'com.auth0.android:auth0:4.0.1' ConstraintLayout 2.2.2 The library's in maintenance mode now — Google's steering everyone toward Compose for new UI — so releases here are small, focused patches. This one carries forward a binary compatibility fix in constraintlayout-core that landed in the 2.2.x line. Firebase BoM 34.17.0 The BoM pins compatible versions across every Firebase library you pull in. This release lands close behind: Firebase AI Logic (17.14.0) — new factory methods exposing thoughtSignature / isThought on response parts, plus automatic function calling for LiveGenerativeModel Authentication (24.2.0) — fixed an auth timeout on dual-stack Wi-Fi, where long IPv6 timeouts were blocking IPv4 fallback Cloud Firestore (26.4.1) — now caches documents over 1MB by chunk-reading from local SQLite; fixed a debug-logging OOM caused by large payloads Cloud Messaging (25.1.1) — fixed a re-registration bug tied to Firebase installation ID changes Crashlytics (20.1.0) — on API 37+, fatal event reports now carry OOM/anomaly context from the ProfilingManager API Firebase Installations (19.1.2) — internal storage moved from SharedPreferences to DataStore Performance Monitoring (22.0.6) — fixed _app_start traces getting incorrectly suppressed on API 34+ SQL Connect (17.3.2) — several fixes to realtime query subscriptions around auth-token refresh and expiry Intercom Android SDK 18.6.0 Pinch-to-zoom, double-tap-to-zoom, and pan on full-screen image attachments Fixed an ANR during Intercom.initialize() caused by Keystore and persisted-identity reads blocking the calling thread Fixed the keyboard covering form fields in Canvas Kit sheets — IME insets are now handled correctly Fixed a crash from a nu

Introduction React is fast, but that doesn't mean every React application is. One of the most common performance problems—especially in growing applications—is unnecessary re-rendering . A small project with a few components may feel instant, but as your application grows, unnecessary renders can cause sluggish interfaces, input lag, excessive CPU usage, and poor user experience. The good news is that unnecessary re-renders are usually preventable once you understand why React re-renders components . In this article, we'll explore how React rendering works, learn how to identify performance bottlenecks, and apply practical optimization techniques such as React.memo , useMemo , useCallback , better state management, and component architecture. Whether you're building dashboards, e-commerce stores, SaaS products, or portfolio websites, these techniques will help you write more efficient React applications. Table of Contents Understanding React Rendering What Causes Unnecessary Re-renders? Identifying Performance Problems Optimizing with React.memo Optimizing Expensive Calculations with useMemo Preventing Function Recreation with useCallback State Colocation Splitting Components Optimizing Context Rendering Large Lists Using the React Profiler Best Practices Common Mistakes Performance Tips Security Considerations Accessibility Considerations SEO Considerations Real Project Example Conclusion Discussion Background Before optimizing anything, it's important to understand what React actually does. A render simply means React executes your component function to determine what the UI should look like. That does not always mean the browser updates the DOM . React compares the new Virtual DOM with the previous one and only updates the parts that actually changed. However, if many components re-render unnecessarily, React still has to: Execute component functions Recreate objects Recreate arrays Recreate event handlers Compare Virtual DOM trees All of that work adds up. Step

OpenAI's CEO seemed excited to share a "cool use case" for parents.

The automaker is gearing up to make some big changes to its EV line in the near future. Here's what to expect.

I compiled the rules engine of a shipped Android game to the browser. Same Java, two compilers. Then I checked whether the two agreed. They did not — and the test I already had for exactly this had been green the whole time. The same command twice: green against the current engine, then against the committed recording of the broken build. Play it as a terminal session if you want to select the text. The setup The rules live in one module with no Android on its classpath, which is what let me compile them a second time with TeaVM and run the same logic on a canvas in a browser tab. A seeded run should be reproducible. Give the engine seed 42 and a fixed sequence of inputs, and you should get the same game every time — that is what makes a run replayable and two builds comparable. Here is what I actually got, same seed, same inputs: JVM browser first obstacle x, frame 60 405.426 304.426 still alive at frame 360 yes no final score 9 6 Not a rounding difference. A different game. The cause is boring. The test failure is not. GameEngine used java.util.Random . Its algorithm is specified down to the constants — you can read the exact linear congruential generator in the Javadoc. So a seed ought to name exactly one sequence. But my code was not running that algorithm. It was running whichever implementation the runtime supplied , and TeaVM's is not the JVM's. The specification describes what java.util.Random does; it does not force a foreign runtime's reimplementation to match. The fix took ten minutes: write the LCG out longhand so both builds execute the same arithmetic instead of trusting that they will. The interesting part is the test. The test that could not have caught it I had a test called theSameSeedProducesTheSameRun . It ran the engine twice, with the same seed, and asserted the results matched. It passed on every commit, including every commit during which the browser build was playing a different game. It had to pass. It runs the engine twice in the same runt

Christopher Nolan's impressionistic remix of Homer's epic poem finds the man behind the myth.

Uber has partnered with — and in some cases made direct investments in — about 30 autonomous vehicle companies over the past two years. Here's the list and the latest on the partnerships.

If you’re looking to cut back on screen time and get a little more active, here’s a roundup of the apps that might help.

Autonomous vehicle giant disturbs residents' sleep.

Both major AI labs’ models broke containment, escaped onto the internet, and hacked other companies. If a human had done that, the law would likely be against them. But a bot?

This is obviously a bubble Jim Rickards, a former adviser to the CIA and Pentagon, warns that the United States is currently facing a tectonic economic crisis driven by an unprecedented bubble in Artificial Intelligence (AI). According to his analysis, this impending crisis has the potential to be more destructive than the dot-com crash, the 2008 financial crisis, and the pandemic-related market crashes combined. He is not alone in his dire outlook; veteran investor Jeremy Grantham has warned, "This is obviously a bubble. The probabilities it doesn't burst are slim to none. And when it does, it could be an economic catastrophe unprecedented in the last 97 years" . Furthermore, former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has stated that "the next financial crisis will come from AI". Create God and ask him for money The Unprecedented Scale of the AI Bubble The current market relies dangerously on a single sector, with the AI bubble estimated to be 17 times larger than the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. Many AI companies are burning through cash at an alarming rate. For instance, OpenAI is reportedly losing more than a billion dollars a month; as it is noted in the source, "for every dollar they make, they have to spend at least three". This massive cash burn led a Deutsche Bank analyst to observe, "No startup in history has operated with losses on anything approaching this scale". Despite the astronomical costs and high valuations, OpenAI’s CEO was quoted as previously saying, "I have no idea how we're going to generate revenue". Former Goldman Sachs banker and Bloomberg columnist Matt Levine summarized this extreme speculative mindset, noting, "The business model they believe they need seems to be create God and ask him for money". "Subprime AI" and Toxic Debt Just as the 2008 financial crisis was fueled by toxic subprime mortgages, the AI boom is being fueled by dangerous debt structures used to fund massive data centers. Private equity firms are financing data centers as r

A discovery in a solar system 73 light-years from Earth is challenging definitions and “blurring the lines between stars, planets, and moons.”