今日已更新 70 条资讯 | 累计 22260 条内容
关于我们

标签:#ast

找到 218 篇相关文章

AI 资讯

Ineffable Intelligence -- RL ASI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD9zEKQEJxo 这视频深入拆解了人工智能强化学习之父、图灵奖得主理查德·萨顿(Richard Sutton) 在2026年5月共同发表的一篇仅有7页、零算法、零跑分的哲学立场论文。这篇论文提出了 “行动认知 AI”(Enactive Artificial Intelligence,简称 Enactive AI)的概念,并在科技界和资本圈引发了巨大震动(甚至让红杉、英伟达、谷歌联合下注了11亿美元成立新公司)。 视频从 核心概念、哲学脉络、理论内在矛盾、认知科学质疑 以及 产业界的三路对赌 五个维度,极其详细地复盘了视频的所有核心内容: 一、 什么是“行动认知 AI”(Enactive AI)? 视频强调,全网很多地方都把 Enactive (行动认知/生成认知)和 Generative (生成式 AI,如 GPT、Sora)混淆了,但两者的底层逻辑恰恰相反 [ 00:50 ]: 生成式 AI(Generative AI): 核心是 续写和预测 。通过已有画面或文本,被动地去预测下一帧、下一个词长什么样 [ 01:07 ]。 行动认知 AI(Enactive AI): 核心是 在互动中现生成认知 。认知不是大脑被动接收信号并建立静态世界模型,而是“你动了手,世界才向你显现” [ 01:47 ]。 > 举例: 人去拿杯子,不是眼睛先拍下一张静态照片让大脑去死算距离、角度 [ 01:53 ],而是手往前探的过程中,随着角度、光影的实时动态变化,杯子的形状和可抓取性才在动作里一点点“长出来” [ 01:59 ]。 感知和行动硬死在一起,无法拆分。 这套理论源自认知科学中的 自创生(Autopoiesis)与自主性(Autonomy) [ 02:21 ]。它认为智能体应该像生物一样自我维持、组织,由内在生存需求去塑造感知,而不是一个干等着外部指令输入输出的机器 [ 02:24 ]。 二、 萨顿为什么要发这篇哲学论文? 萨顿并不是一时性起,这是他为了对抗当前“大模型路线”打出的最后一张哲学底牌: 2019年《苦涩的教训》: 主张人类手写规则干不过堆算力、让机器自己学的通用方法 [ 02:47 ]。 2024年《大世界假设》: 真实世界远比静态内部模型复杂,智能体必须在运行中实时学习 [ 02:59 ]。 2025年《经验时代》: 人类数据是有限的,AI 必须靠自己生成自己的经验长大的 [ 03:12 ]。 2025年9月: 直指整个 AI 行业走错路,大模型堆数据去超智是死路一条 [ 03:19 ]。 这篇论文补上了最后一把火: 之前的论证全是算力、数据和复杂度的“机械账” [ 03:25 ]。而这一次,他第一次把强化学习(RL) 和 认知科学(行动认知)接在了一起,从本体论层面证明: 大模型路走不通,认识世界这件事本身,就只能通过行动和互动的经验来发生 [ 03:39 ]。 为此,2026年初论文共作者创办了 Ineffable Intelligence 公司,号称要造出完全不需要人类数据、靠自己学习的 AI,直接拿到了红杉、英伟达、谷歌 11 亿美元的巨额融资(估值 51 亿美元) [ 03:55 ]。 三、 论文隐藏的两大致命致命逻辑“回旋镖” 视频话锋一转,指出萨顿借来的这套哲学地基里,埋着两根砸中他自己的“大柱子”: 柱子 1:砸中了萨顿的“奖励假设”(自相矛盾) [ 04:35 ] 强化学习的号称教条: 奖励假设(Reward Hypothesis),即所有目标、意图都可以写成“最大化外部给定的标量分数” [ 04:53 ]。David Silver 甚至喊出“奖励就够了” [ 05:13 ]。 行动认知哲学的教条: 自主性(Autonomy),即什么是好坏、成败,标准必须从智能体随时会散架的“物理组织和生存危机”中自发长出来,不能由外部权威操控 [ 05:27 ]。 裂缝: 标准强化学习的奖励函数(Reward Function)是人类设计者用代码硬塞进去的(他律) [ 05:55 ];而生物判断好坏是为了顶住熵增、维持结构不崩(自主) [ 06:11 ]。论文里作者自己也承认:强化学习的评估标准依然由外部奖励定义 [ 06:38 ]。 内驱动机能救场吗? 比如好奇心驱动或求知驱动。视频认为不能,因为诸如“优化预测误差”的总结优化目标,依然是人类在架构层死死规定好的,根本不是智能体出于生存忧关的自发需求。没有真正的生命威胁,就没真正的意义生成 [ 07:12 ]。 柱子 2:砸中了萨顿自己的《苦涩的教训》 [ 07:49 ] 萨顿当年痛骂:研究者总忍不住把人类以为的思考结构(比如语法树、手工特征检测器)硬塞进 AI 架构里,这长期必被碾压 [ 08:13

2026-06-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

Day 28 — 🔭 Monitoring & Observability Part One

In Modern Time applications are no longer simple monolithic systems. Today organizations run: Microservices Kubernetes Containers Serverless Functions Multi-Cloud Platforms Distributed Systems As infrastructure becomes more distributed, troubleshooting becomes significantly harder. A single user request may travel through: Frontend ↓ API Gateway ↓ Microservice A ↓ Microservice B ↓ Database When something breaks, the biggest challenge becomes: "What exactly happened?" This is where Observability becomes critical. 🔗 Resources ** Support the Journey on GitHub: If you're following along, consider starring and forking the repo:** https://github.com/17J/30-Days-Cloud-DevSecOps-Journey What is Observability? Observability is the ability to understand the internal state of a system by analyzing the data it produces. In simple words: Can we understand what is happening inside our systems? Observability helps engineers answer: Why is the application slow? Which service is failing? Which request caused the issue? What changed recently? Where is latency occurring? Without observability: Problem Exists ↓ Guessing Begins With observability: Problem Exists ↓ Evidence Available ↓ Faster Resolution Why Observability Matters Modern cloud-native systems generate enormous amounts of data. Example: 100 Microservices ↓ Millions of Requests ↓ Thousands of Containers Traditional monitoring alone is no longer sufficient. Organizations need: Visibility Insights Correlation Root Cause Analysis Observability provides all of them. Monitoring vs Observability Many people confuse monitoring and observability. Monitoring asks: What is wrong? Observability asks: Why is it wrong? Example: Monitoring: CPU Usage = 95% Observability: Which service? Which request? Which dependency? Which deployment caused it? Observability provides context. The Three Pillars of Observability Modern observability is built on three primary pillars. Metrics Logs Traces Or: Monitoring Logging Tracing Together they provide a

2026-06-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

What is AWS EC2 Instance Storage? A Complete 2026 Guide for Developers

If you’ve ever spent hours debugging slow EC2 workloads or getting sticker shock from unexpected EBS IOPS charges, you’ve probably wondered if there’s a better storage option for temporary, high-performance data. AWS EC2 Instance Storage (also called Instance Store) is one of the most underutilized but powerful tools in the EC2 ecosystem—if you know how to use it correctly. This guide breaks down everything you need to know: core concepts, performance optimizations, use cases, limitations, and how it stacks up against EBS. By the end, you’ll be able to cut storage costs, boost workload performance, and avoid costly data loss mistakes. Table of Contents What Exactly Is AWS EC2 Instance Storage? Core Concepts of EC2 Instance Store Key Features That Make Instance Store Stand Out Which EC2 Instance Types Support Instance Store? Deep Dive: NVMe SSD Instance Store Volumes SSD Instance Store Performance Best Practices EC2 Instance Store vs EBS: Head-to-Head Comparison Top Real-World Use Cases for EC2 Instance Store Critical Limitations to Avoid Costly Mistakes Production-Grade Best Practices for Instance Store Root Volume Options: EBS-Backed vs Instance Store-Backed Instances EC2 Instance Store Pricing: No Hidden Costs Conclusion References What Exactly Is AWS EC2 Instance Storage? EC2 Instance Store is temporary block-level storage that is physically attached to the host server running your EC2 instance. Unlike standalone storage services like EBS, EFS, or S3, it is part of the EC2 service itself, with no network overhead between your instance and the storage disks. Its defining trait is its ephemeral nature: data stored on Instance Store only persists for the lifetime of the associated instance. If you stop, hibernate, or terminate your instance, all data on Instance Store volumes is permanently deleted. Core Concepts of EC2 Instance Store Before you start using Instance Store, make sure you understand these foundational rules: Device naming : Instance Store volumes are

2026-06-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

LearnX-Radar – Daily AI audio lessons from developer trends + Dutch coach

I built something I desperately needed: daily AI audio lessons from real developer trends (plus a Dutch coach for inburgering B1). The hardest part wasn't the AI. It was figuring out how to score genuine rising skills vs. one-day noise. I ended up building a cross-day momentum signal that rewards skills accelerating over 3+ days and dampers spikes. But I'm stuck on the next problem: how do you personalize this without storing user data? (I'm privacy-first, so no subscriber DB — Telegram holds the member list.) If you've solved this, I'd love your take. And if you're learning Dutch + coding, I'd appreciate you trying it and telling me what's useless. What I'm curious about: Is the momentum signal actually working — am I surfacing real trends or just noise? Would the Dutch coach be useful for expat developers in NL, or is it too niche? Technical details (for those who care): • 7 sources: GitHub Trending, HN (Who-is-Hiring + front page), Stack Overflow tag deltas, dev.to, Reddit, Lobste.rs • Map-reduce skill extraction with deterministic attribution (corpus scan, not LLM tally) • Grounded briefs: reads actual source text via Jina + Exa, cited sources • Delivered via Telegram (audio + PDF), Spotify podcast, email • Privacy: PII redacted at ingestion, no subscriber data stored Live: https://yusuprozimemet.github.io/LearnX-Radar/ GitHub: https://github.com/Yusuprozimemet/LearnX-Radar (P.S. This is still beta — I'm looking for feedback, not users. If you try it, tell me what's useless, not what's good.)

2026-06-07 原文 →
AI 资讯

The Hypervisor Is Becoming a Policy Enforcement Point

Most organizations still think of the hypervisor as a resource abstraction layer. CPU. Memory. Storage. The platform that decides where workloads run. That mental model is increasingly incomplete. Every major virtualization platform — vSphere, AHV, Proxmox — has been steadily accumulating policy enforcement responsibilities. The hypervisor isn't just deciding where workloads run. It's increasingly deciding what they're allowed to do. The Speed of the Shift Is the Real Story Virtualization practitioners already know security controls have moved downward through the stack. What's less appreciated is how compressed the most recent phase has been. For years, hypervisors enforced resource allocation. Within a single platform generation cycle, that same layer accumulated encryption policy enforcement, workload trust validation, microsegmentation, secure boot enforcement, host attestation, and workload isolation boundaries — not as optional add-ons, but as core platform capabilities. The perimeter-to-OS transition took decades. The hypervisor accumulated a comparable policy enforcement surface in the time between one major vSphere release and the next. That compressed timeline is what creates the ownership lag — the governance model adequate for a resource scheduler has not caught up to a platform that enforces organizational policy. The Hypervisor Now Makes Binding Decisions The distinction that matters: a platform that observes policy versus a platform that enforces it. The hypervisor is no longer observing. It is enforcing. VM fails attestation → workload does not start. Encryption policy mismatch → workload cannot migrate. Segmentation policy violation → communication blocked at the platform layer. Trust validation failure → host removed from workload eligibility. Those are not scheduling decisions. Those are governance outcomes. The workload doesn't get a vote. This is what makes the hypervisor governance infrastructure : infrastructure that directly enforces organiza

2026-06-07 原文 →
AI 资讯

Terraform vs CDK vs Pulumi: Choosing Your Infrastructure-as-Code Tool

The IaC landscape split into two philosophies about a decade ago and hasn't fully resolved the argument since. On one side: declarative configuration languages designed specifically for infrastructure (Terraform HCL, CloudFormation YAML, Bicep). On the other: general-purpose programming languages brought to infrastructure (AWS CDK, Pulumi). Both approaches have won in production at major organizations. Neither is clearly superior. This comparison covers Terraform, AWS CDK, and Pulumi in depth — how they work, where they excel, where they struggle, and which makes sense for different team situations. It isn't a beginner introduction to any of these tools; if you're choosing between them for a real project, this assumes you've at least skimmed each one. The core philosophical difference Terraform's HCL is a purpose-built configuration language. It's not Turing-complete (no arbitrary loops, no recursion, limited conditionals). This is by design: HashiCorp's position is that infrastructure definitions should be readable, predictable, and safe to generate tooling around. When you read a .tf file, you can understand what it creates without executing anything. CDK and Pulumi take the opposite position: the limitations of configuration languages are a tax on productive engineers. Why invent a domain-specific language when TypeScript already exists? Real programming languages have proper abstractions, test frameworks, package managers, IDE support, and a billion engineers who already know them. Infrastructure should be no different from application code. Both positions have merit. The choice between them often comes down to who's writing the infrastructure more than which approach is technically superior. Terraform Terraform is the default choice for infrastructure-as-code in 2026. It works with every major cloud provider and hundreds of minor ones. The Terraform Registry has thousands of modules — reusable packages for common patterns like VPCs, EKS clusters, and RDS databa

2026-06-07 原文 →
AI 资讯

What Happens When an AI Agent Manages Your Password Vault

TL;DR Claude Code and the op CLI reorganized 690 credentials — four vaults, 390 items tagged, SSH agent configured — in one session. This is AI-native work: the agent operated the vault; the human set direction and approved via Touch ID. The CLI failed on 18 items with social-auth ( UNKNOWN field type) — hard failure, not graceful degradation; a real reliability blocker for team-scale use. The bug was filed from the terminal via the GitHub CLI in the same session it was found. If your password manager has a CLI, you already have everything needed to run this. I've been a 1Password user for years. Not in a conscious, intentional way — more in the way you use a good chair: it became part of how I work and I stopped thinking about it. That changed when I set up a new machine. I had to install 1Password, wire up the SSH agent, reconnect the CLI, re-authenticate everything. The process took longer than it should have because I'd never written down what I'd built. I'd only accumulated it. And somewhere in the middle of that setup, it hit me: I had 690 credentials in one flat vault — logins from jobs I'd left years ago sitting next to active API keys, personal bank accounts mixed with infrastructure credentials, demo user passwords alongside production secrets. The kind of accumulation that happens when a tool works well enough that you never stop to organize it. I'd been meaning to clean it up for a long time. I never did, because the job is exactly the kind of work that's too tedious to do manually and too important to skip: touch every item, make a judgment call, move it somewhere sensible, repeat 690 times. Then I realized: with Claude Code and the op CLI, this was now actually possible. Not assisted — the agent could do it. So I handed it the keys. What "AI-native" actually means here Quick context on timing: 1Password launched its SSH agent and CLI 2.0 in March 2022. Git commit signing via the vault came six months later. These are mature, stable features — not betas

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

FastAPI for AI Engineers - Part 3: Connecting to a database

In the previous article, we explored how to build our first CRUD API using FastAPI. While our API worked correctly, there was one major problem. We were storing data inside Python lists, which exist only in memory. If you've ever wondered how applications like Instagram, LinkedIn, or ChatGPT remember information even after a server restart, the answer is simple: databases. In this article, we'll solve the problem of in-memory storage by connecting our FastAPI application to SQLite using SQLAlchemy. If you haven't read the previous post, check it out: FastAPI for AI Engineers - Part 2: Building Your First CRUD API Ananya S Ananya S Ananya S Follow Jun 1 FastAPI for AI Engineers - Part 2: Building Your First CRUD API # ai # backend # fastapi # python 7 reactions Comments Add Comment 4 min read By the end of this article, you'll understand: Why in-memory storage is a problem What SQLite is What SQLAlchemy is How ORM works How to create database tables using Python classes How to perform CRUD operations using a real database The Problem with In-Memory Storage Previously, our application stored students inside a Python list. students = [ { " id " : 1 , " name " : " Ananya " , " department " : " CSE " , " cgpa " : 8.9 } ] This worked for learning CRUD operations. However, consider what happens when the server restarts: FastAPI Server Stops ↓ Python Memory Cleared ↓ All Student Data Lost This is unacceptable in real-world applications. We need a place where data can survive application restarts. This is where databases come in. What is SQLite? SQLite is a lightweight relational database. Unlike MySQL or PostgreSQL, SQLite doesn't require a separate database server. Instead, everything is stored inside a single file. students.db Advantages of SQLite: No installation required Lightweight Easy to learn Perfect for local development Great for small projects For this article, we'll use SQLite. What is SQLAlchemy? Before SQLAlchemy, developers often wrote raw SQL queries. Exampl

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

The Interview Prep Mistake That Kept Holding Me Back

[While preparing for interviews, I realized I had a strange habit. I would solve a problem, get stuck, open the solution, understand it, and move on feeling productive. A few days later, I couldn’t solve a similar problem on my own. The issue wasn’t lack of practice. The issue was that I was consuming solutions faster than I was developing problem-solving skills. So I changed my approach. Instead of looking for answers, I started forcing myself to think longer, write down my ideas, identify where I was stuck, and only then seek guidance. That worked much better. But I couldn’t find a tool that supported this style of learning. Most platforms either: Give you the answer. Give you the editorial. Give you AI that writes the code for you. So I started building my own. The goal was simple: An AI coach that guides the thought process instead of generating the solution. Over time I added: DSA practice System Design preparation Low-Level Design preparation Company-wise interview questions Topic-wise strength and weakness analysis Personalized revision lists The interesting part wasn’t building it. The interesting part was realizing that interview preparation is less about collecting solutions and more about training how you think. What has helped you improve more during interview prep? Reading solutions? Or struggling with the problem first? Sde vault - https://sdevaultweb.onrender.com/

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

Day 26 - HashiCorp Vault & Secrets Management

Modern applications depend on secrets. Every application requires: Database Passwords API Keys SSH Keys TLS Certificates Cloud Credentials OAuth Tokens Service Account Keys The biggest question is: Where should we store them securely? Unfortunately many organizations still store secrets in: Git Repository Docker Image Application Config Files Environment Variables Shared Documents Excel Sheets This creates a massive security risk. This is why Secret Management platforms like HashiCorp Vault became critical in modern cloud-native environments. 🔗 Resources ** Support the Journey on GitHub: If you're following along, consider starring and forking the repo:** https://github.com/17J/30-Days-Cloud-DevSecOps-Journey What is a Secret? A secret is any sensitive piece of information used to authenticate or authorize access. Examples: Database Password AWS Access Key JWT Signing Key API Token TLS Certificate Private Key OAuth Secret If a secret gets exposed: Attacker ↓ Application Access ↓ Database Access ↓ Infrastructure Compromise What is Secrets Management? Secrets Management is the process of: Store Protect Rotate Control Audit sensitive credentials securely. A modern secrets management platform provides: Centralized storage Encryption Access control Secret rotation Audit logs Dynamic credentials Why Secrets Management Matters Imagine this scenario: database : username : admin password : Password123 committed into GitHub. Result: Developer Pushes Code ↓ GitHub Repository ↓ Credential Leak ↓ Database Breach This happens more often than people realize. The Problem with Traditional Secret Storage Many teams use: .env Files Kubernetes Secrets Configuration Files Hardcoded Passwords Problems: Difficult rotation No audit trail Poor access control Risk of accidental exposure Compliance failures What is HashiCorp Vault? HashiCorp Vault is a centralized secrets management platform designed to securely store, access, and manage secrets. Think of Vault as: Central Secret Bank for you

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

Astro + Cloudflare Pages: 3 Deploy Bugs You'll Probably Hit

I've been building a static Astro site on Cloudflare Pages over the last few weeks. Sharing the 3 deployment bugs that cost me the most time, in case they save anyone else the same loop. Setup Astro 5 + Cloudflare Pages + Tailwind 4. Content lives in a few JSON files; each page is a dynamic route mapped over the data. Free-tier hosting, no backend. Standard static-first stack. Bug 1: Trailing-slash 307 chain I started with trailingSlash: 'never' in Astro config. Build output went to dist/foo/index.html . Result: Astro emitted canonical tags as /foo (no slash), but Cloudflare Pages served /foo/ (auto-adding the slash via 307). Google Search Console flagged pages as "Redirect error" because the canonical URL pointed at a redirect chain instead of a real 200. I first tried build.format: 'file' to get flat dist/foo.html output, hoping that would bypass the trailing slash. That made it worse — Cloudflare still 307-stripped, but now to a non-existent .html file → 404. Fix: stop fighting the platform. ​ js // astro.config.mjs export default defineConfig({ trailingSlash: 'always', // ... }); ​ trailingSlash: 'always' plus default directory build aligns the canonical URL with what Pages actually serves. The redirect errors resolved on next re-crawl. Bug 2: _redirects rejected at deploy I tried to do a www → apex 301 in public/_redirects : https://www.example.com/* https://example.com/:splat 301! Cloudflare rejected the deploy with three validation errors: ​ Line 13: Only relative URLs are allowed. Line 22: Duplicate rule for path /foo. Line 23: Duplicate rule for path /bar. ​ Pages tightened _redirects validation — absolute-URL sources aren't accepted anymore. The duplicate errors were because Astro's own redirects config in astro.config.mjs generates HTML meta-refresh files that Pages parses as implicit redirect rules — conflicting with my explicit ones. Fix: delete _redirects entirely. Use a Cloudflare Redirect Rule from the dashboard for cross-host 301s (Wildcard pattern,

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

This is your laptop… on AI

We're now deep into developer conference season, and one of the themes so far is the relentless conviction from Big Tech companies that AI is going to change everything about how we do everything. Nvidia's Jensen Huang made that clearer than anyone this week, when he described a completely new way of using our laptops […]

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

How We Strengthened Magento Performance Architecture for a Multi-Million Product Store

Managing a multi-million product catalog on Magento presents unique challenges around performance, scalability, and operational efficiency. At Rave Digital, we recently undertook a Magento performance optimization project for a large-scale eCommerce merchant struggling with slow site speed, infrastructure bottlenecks, and backend instability. This use case breakdown details how we modernized their Magento architecture, optimized database performance, and scaled infrastructure to deliver a stable, high-speed shopping experience. This post is tailored for eCommerce managers, directors, and Magento merchants—especially those running Adobe Commerce or Magento Open Source platforms—who want to understand practical strategies for Magento architecture scaling and performance tuning for large catalogs. The Problem: Performance Bottlenecks in a Complex Magento Environment: Our client operated an enterprise Magento store with a multi-million product catalog. Despite Magento’s robust capabilities, the site suffered from: Slow page load times impacting user experience and SEO Scalability challenges as product volume and traffic grew Infrastructure bottlenecks causing backend instability and downtime Complex integrations and manual processes limiting operational efficiency Platform limitations in handling large catalog management and real-time inventory updates These issues collectively threatened the site’s ability to support growth and deliver a seamless customer experience. The client sought a comprehensive Magento platform modernization to address these challenges. Context: Why Magento Architecture and Infrastructure Matter Magento’s flexibility and extensibility make it ideal for enterprise eCommerce, but large catalogs require careful architecture and infrastructure planning. Key technical pain points include: Database performance under heavy read/write loads Indexing delays and cache invalidation impacting site speed Integration complexity with third-party systems and API

2026-06-05 原文 →