今日已更新 213 条资讯 | 累计 20683 条内容
关于我们

标签：#github

找到 1034 篇相关文章

AI 资讯

Learn Leetcode daily with Claude code mentor

This is a submission for the GitHub Finish-Up-A-Thon Challenge What I Built After being abandoned for several months, I have come back to build and complete Claude with LeetCode, which is a DSA learning system that automates daily algorithm education with Claude code directly inside GitHub repo. Every time I submit an accepted solution on Leetcode, the Github workflow fetches my Leetcode account data and commit the problem with the solution to the repo. Claude will then run on a fixed schedule and automatically generates a full structured lecture, covering the DSA topic, brute force through optimal solutions in Python, complexity analysis, and a YouTube video packaged in a GitHub Issue. This project means a lot to me because it merges two things I care about daily: now not only can I solve Leetcode problem, my solution is automatically analyzed by a powerful AI agent mentor. Demo Link to my project: https://github.com/Stewie-pixel/claude-with-leetcode.git Link to my application walkthrough: https://youtu.be/ClWdW3v9JJ0 The Comeback Story At first this was only a project to store the Leetcode questions I have solved. The process required manual pushing the problem to the repo and nothing special. Later I have added the automation workflow to fetch data from my Leetcode account, Claude will be prompted like an experienced dsa mentor from Claude and skill.md file to give a thorough analysis on that problem. And at the end of the day, Github Copilot workflow will give a daily summary report to cover my daily progress. My Experience with GitHub Copilot I built a DSA Mentor skill that gives Copilot the full context of what a lecture should contain: topic identification, the brute force to optimal approach structure, complexity analysis requirements, and the YouTube search step. Without Copilot, writing the dsaMentor.js orchestration logic and getting the agent to consistently produce structured markdown output would have taken significantly longer. I then use Copilot cli

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

OpsPilot AI: Reviving an Unfinished AI-Powered Operations Platform with GitHub Copilot

This is a submission for the GitHub Finish-Up-A-Thon Challenge OpsPilot AI: Reviving an Unfinished AI-Powered Operations Platform with GitHub Copilot What I Built OpsPilot AI is an AI-powered operations assistant designed to help DevOps engineers, SREs, and operations teams investigate incidents, monitor service health, and gain actionable operational insights. The project originally started as a side project inspired by my experience working in production support and monitoring environments. I built an initial version to validate the idea but never fully completed it. The core concept was promising, but several important features and usability improvements were still missing. Through the GitHub Finish-Up-A-Thon Challenge, I revisited the project and transformed it into a much more complete and polished MVP. Key features include: AI-powered incident analysis Root cause investigation assistance MTTR analytics dashboard Service health monitoring Incident trend analysis Executive reporting insights Modern responsive user interface Demo Live Application GitHub Repository OpsPilot AI helps operations teams reduce investigation time and improve operational visibility through AI-powered workflows and analytics. The Comeback Story When I first started OpsPilot AI, it was mainly an experiment to explore how AI could assist operations teams during incident investigations. Although the foundation was built, the project was left unfinished because of limited time and competing priorities. The original version lacked: Incident analytics Meaningful operational insights Root cause investigation workflows Executive reporting capabilities A polished user experience For this challenge, I focused on completing the project and turning it into a usable MVP. What I Added AI Incident Analysis Enhanced the platform with AI-powered incident summaries and investigation assistance. Operations Analytics Added dashboards to track: Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR) Incident frequency Service health

2026-06-06 原文 →
AI 资讯

You're Not Doing GitOps (You're Doing CI/CD With Extra Steps)

The Uncomfortable Truth Here's a test: when your deployment fails in production, what happens to your main branch? If the answer is "the broken code is already merged" — congratulations, you're doing CI/CD with a Git trigger. That's not GitOps. It's a pipeline that happens to watch a branch. I've spent years building platform engineering systems at enterprise scale — identity management frameworks, infrastructure-as-code pipelines, AI agent platforms that manage operational code. And I keep seeing the same mistake: teams adopt "GitOps" by adding a deployment step after merge, then wonder why they get drift. True GitOps has one non-negotiable rule: main always equals production. If a deployment fails, main doesn't change. Period. This isn't just my opinion — it's the logical extension of OpenGitOps principles : declarative desired state, versioned in Git, automatically reconciled. The enforcement mechanism I'm describing is how you make those principles real rather than aspirational. The Anti-Pattern Everyone Runs The most common "GitOps" setup I see in enterprise teams looks like this: Developer opens PR CI runs tests Reviewer approves PR merges to main Deployment triggers from main ❌ Deployment fails main now contains code that isn't in production This is merge-then-deploy . It's standard CI/CD with extra steps. The moment you merge before confirming a successful deployment, you've broken the core GitOps contract: Git as the single source of truth for what's actually running. The result? Drift. Stale state in main . A branch that lies about what's deployed. Every subsequent PR is now based on a broken foundation. The Enforcement Pattern: Deploy Before Merge The fix isn't philosophical — it's mechanical. GitHub's Merge Queue gives you exactly the right primitive: Developer opens PR CI runs tests (standard checks) Reviewer approves → PR enters the merge queue Merge queue trigger runs a dry-run deployment against the target environment If dry-run passes → queue trigge

2026-06-06 原文 →
← 上一页 下一页 →