标签:#hack
找到 15146 篇相关文章
Stolen Buttons
US gas prices hit an average of $4 a gallon again
Apple probably won't add Jony Ive to OpenAI trade secret theft suit
Exploit brokers pay $500k for WordPress RCEs. I found one with GPT5.6 and $25
Nolan's Odyssey – A technical analysis by a nitpicky Classics student
Taking OCaml and Eio for a Spin
Show HN: GeoChess – open-source geography strategy game
The rules are really simple. Players take turns claiming a country that shares a land border with the current one. You lose if you have no valid moves left. I'd appreciate any feedback. Source code: https://github.com/spider-hand/GeoChess
EU Exempts Apple Watch and AirPods from Battery Removal Requirements
Britain: A Cautionary Tale for America
My USB Drive Has a Hidden Encrypted Vault
New Mexico Denies Gas Pipeline Permit for Oracle Data Center
How proprietary formats have become Microsoft’s main tool for lock-in
Xiaomi-Robotics-1
LoRA Speedrun – a public wall-clock leaderboard for fine-tuning techniques
Fractl.art – a fractal generator with 8 octillion different patterns
When can a power company take your land for data center infrastructure?
Power companies are using eminent domain to seize land for data centers
We built an AI board of directors on Qwen. Then we asked it whether we should migrate to Qwen.
Solo founders and small operators make big, irreversible calls alone. Expand into a new market or not. Kill the product line or keep bleeding on it. A real board of advisors would catch the bad ones, but real boards are expensive and slow, and most people running a 10-person company are never getting one. Steven and I kept circling this problem, so when the Qwen hackathon came around we built FounderOS: an AI board of directors. You bring one decision, eight specialist agents argue about it, and you get a board memo back. The thing we cared about most, and the reason we didn't just build another chatbot wrapper, is that the disagreement survives into the memo. If the board didn't align, you can read who dissented and what would change their mind. Live demo: https://founderos-zeta.vercel.app Repo: https://github.com/VincentJulijanto/FounderOS Video: https://youtu.be/X6x_u6IWHog The board It's a LangGraph state machine underneath. A Scout frames the options first. Market Intelligence pulls cited benchmarks. Four analysts (Trend, Finance, Growth, Capability) run in parallel with asyncio.gather. Then the Skeptic gets everyone's work and attacks the weakest assumption it can find, a debate engine detects the conflicts and runs rebuttal rounds, and the Chair writes the memo. We'd both seen multi-agent demos where five agents produce one suspiciously smooth answer, which means somewhere in the pipeline the disagreement got averaged out. We wanted the opposite. Agents revise their positions when the counterargument is good, and if a conflict doesn't resolve within the round limit it ships in the memo as attributed dissent instead of disappearing. Everything runs on Qwen through the DashScope API. We split by role: qwen-turbo does the fast work (Scout, the analysts, research, the memory index) and qwen-plus does the heavy reasoning (Skeptic, Chair, the debate itself). A full board run comes out to roughly two cents and about two minutes. The two cents part is what makes the