标签：#lora

LighthouseReckoning LighthouseReckoning is a lightweight LoRa mesh networking library for Arduino-compatible microcontrollers, currently tested on ESP32 and RP2040 with SX126x LoRa radios. What is LighthouseReckoning? The goal is simple: Sensor → Relay → Relay → Home One node acts as the Home node . Other nodes automatically determine a path toward it. A node does not need to know the entire network topology. Instead, nodes exchange information about their distance to Home and select a suitable neighboring node as their next hop. For example: Sensor | v Sensor → Relay → Relay → Home ^ | Sensor This allows nodes to communicate over multiple hops without manually configuring routes. How does routing work? Each node keeps track of information about its neighbors and their distance to Home. For example: Node Distance Home 0 hops Relay A 1 hop Relay B 2 hops Sensor C 3 hops Sensor C can therefore forward its data toward Relay B, which forwards it toward Home. When the network changes, nodes can update their routing information and select a different path. Hop-by-hop reliability LighthouseReckoning uses hop-by-hop confirmation instead of requiring one end-to-end acknowledgment. Sensor C → Relay A → Relay B → Home Sensor C only needs confirmation that Relay A received its packet. Relay A then handles the next hop independently. This allows each node to deal with retries locally instead of requiring Home to maintain the state of every route in the network. Using the library A basic node can be initialized with: #include <RadioLib.h> #include <LighthouseReckoning.h> LighthouseReckoning lhr ; void setup () { // Initialize your LoRa radio here lhr . beginAsNode ( & radio , 0xA1B2C3D4 ); } void loop () { lhr . update (); uint8_t payload [] = { 0x01 , 0x02 , 0x03 }; // Send application data when needed lhr . sendData ( payload , sizeof ( payload )); } The Home node uses beginAsHome() and can receive application data through the library's callback mechanism. The library is design

Builder Journal · Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer (MEDA) Virtual Sensor Recovery Ten times in a row I predicted what my next submission would score before I uploaded it. The worst miss was 0.0025 on a number around nineteen. I took that as confirmation that the physics underneath was correct. It was confirmation that I can do arithmetic. Two days before this competition closed I pointed a review at my own endgame, expecting notes about the code. It came back with three errors and none of them were in the code. All three were in my reasoning, and all three had the same shape: I had run something that felt like a measurement and was not one. This is the fourth entry in this series and the one I would keep if I had to burn the other three. The models are competition-specific. This part is not. The competition in one breath Perseverance carries an environmental station called MEDA. Some of its surface pressure readings are missing, and the competition is to reconstruct them. Scored on mean squared error. The wrinkle is the split. Training covers sols 1 through 100, when pressure is climbing toward its seasonal peak. Test covers sols 201 through 300, when it is falling hard toward the aphelion minimum. Sols 101 through 200 do not exist in either file. Every prediction is outside the range the model was fit on. The first entry covers the first submission, which contained no machine learning at all and took the top of the board at 61.04. Six weeks and seven versions later the public score was 18.99. Almost everything in between was selected by one signal. Not cross-validation. Cross-validation here can only hold out sols from the rising limb, so it is structurally blind to the regime I am scored on. The leaderboard was the only thing that could see the falling limb, so the leaderboard picked every scalar that mattered: the residual shrink, the blend weight, a constant seasonal offset, a diurnal scaling. Hold onto that. It becomes the joke about four hundred words from

Researchers identified traces of erythrulose, a monosaccharide, thousands of light-years away.

The amendment would restrict building codes that promote electrification.

"It's very clear that in the United States there is a big need for an additional crew vehicle."