今日已更新 313 条资讯 | 累计 38170 条内容
关于我们

标签：#open

找到 2672 篇相关文章

AI 资讯

Built an autonomous dependency upgrader using Loop Engineering and LangGraph

You have a project with 20 dependencies. Half of them are outdated. Running ncu -u or pip install --upgrade upgrades all of them at once — and when something breaks, you have no idea which package caused it. So you don't upgrade. The deps rot. Security patches pile up. loopgrade fixes this. It upgrades one dependency at a time, runs your test suite after each upgrade, commits if it passes, reverts if it fails, and moves on to the next one. When it's done, it gives you a full report of what was upgraded, what failed, and why. GitHub: https://github.com/Sagar-S-R/loopgrade PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/loopgrade/ Open for Contributors #Python #LangGraph #opensource

2026-07-16 原文 →
AI 资讯

A diagram is data, not a drawing

I gave one model the same 44-node architecture twice. The first time I asked for raw SVG — place every box, route every edge, hand me the coordinates. The second time I asked it to describe the same system as typed JSON and let a layout engine draw it. Same model, same session, same brief. The only thing I changed was the output boundary. The boxes are fine in both. I want to be upfront about that, because the usual version of this pitch is out of date. Models place labeled boxes well now. If you ask a current frontier model for a six-box flowchart as SVG you get a clean six-box flowchart, and if that's what you need, go do that — it's the right tool and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. What broke was the edges. With no routing algorithm the model just drew long diagonals straight through unrelated boxes. Not a few — everywhere the graph got dense. And when I changed one node, the entire hand-placed coordinate layout had to be regenerated, and came back different. That second part is the one that actually annoyed me. It's not a rendering bug you can squint past. The picture is a dead artifact: you can't diff it, you can't edit one box, you can't get the same one twice. Every change is a full regeneration and a fresh roll of the dice. This isn't a "wait for a better model" problem Here's the part I'd push back on if someone else wrote it, so let me make the case. Routing a connector around obstacles across a nested graph is global constraint optimization. It's the specific thing layout engines like ELK exist to solve. A model emitting SVG has to commit to an x/y for every point, in order, with no way to backtrack once it sees the whole picture — it's predicting the next token, not solving a layout. So a better model gives you nicer boxes, not untangled edges . The failure is structural, and I'd expect it to reproduce across models past a couple dozen nodes. If you don't buy that, the honest move is to test it: throw a 40-node architecture at whatever model you tru

2026-07-16 原文 →
AI 资讯

pinto: A Git-Native Scrum Backlog and Kanban Board for Your Terminal

pinto lets teams manage Scrum backlogs as plain text. Every backlog change can be inspected with git diff , carried across a branch, merged, and reviewed in a pull request—just like source code. The backlog follows the same lifecycle as the product it describes. pinto is local-first: no server, account, or hosted database is required. It works with AI agents, but never depends on them. And unlike a generic CLI to-do list, its core model is Scrum: Product Backlog Items (PBIs), Sprints, Kanban, and the metrics teams use to inspect and adapt. Why pinto exists Jira, Asana, and Notion are capable products. But as more features accumulate, the process can start serving the tool instead of the other way around: Creating one ticket means navigating required fields and workflow settings. Running a Sprint begins with configuring permissions, automations, or dashboards. Even a small status change feels expensive when the tool is slow to open. Scrum is meant to be a lightweight framework for rapid inspection and adaptation . When maintaining the board becomes work in its own right, the tooling has lost sight of that goal. The name pinto comes from the Japanese word ピント “focus.” That is also the design intent: keep the team's attention on the Product Backlog, the Sprint, and the work flowing across the board. pinto deliberately stays small. It starts quickly, keeps dependencies and vocabulary limited, stores durable data as readable files, and excludes project-suite features such as Gantt charts and CRM. Your backlog belongs in the repository Running pinto init creates a .pinto/ directory beside your code. Each PBI is a Markdown file with TOML frontmatter. Here is a real item from pinto's own backlog: +++ id = "P-2" title = "Investigate and fix Windows CI while retaining Windows support" status = "done" rank = "j" labels = ["ci", "windows"] created = "2026-07-15T06:24:58.731847Z" updated = "2026-07-15T09:34:50.653786Z" +++ # Summary Investigate, verify, and fix the current Windo

2026-07-16 原文 →
AI 资讯

OpenAI finally launches hardware… for Codex

OpenAI is finally releasing some hardware. No, it isn't the mysterious AI-powered device the company is developing with former Apple designer Jony Ive, a project already tangled up in a messy lawsuit. Instead, it's a product designed to be used with its coding platform, Codex. The device, a square-shaped block of buttons called Codex Micro, […]

2026-07-16 原文 →
开源项目

🔥 zhinianboke / xianyu-auto-reply - 闲鱼自动回复管理系统是一个基于 Python + FastAPI 开发的自动化客服系统，专为闲鱼平台设计。系统通过 We

GitHub热门项目 | 闲鱼自动回复管理系统是一个基于 Python + FastAPI 开发的自动化客服系统，专为闲鱼平台设计。系统通过 WebSocket 连接闲鱼服务器，实时接收和处理消息，提供智能化的自动回复服务。同时集成闲鱼自动发货，自动评价，自动擦亮等功能，实现闲鱼虚拟商品自动化流程。 | Stars: 5,759 | 42 stars today | 语言: Python

2026-07-15 原文 →
AI 资讯

Where ACC Fits in the Agent Stack: Transport, Runtime Control, and Business Authority

Connecting an AI agent to a tool is becoming easier. Letting that agent operate a real business system responsibly is still a different problem. Imagine an existing commerce system with APIs for reading orders, changing inventory, creating refunds, and disabling staff accounts. OpenAPI can describe the endpoints. A tool protocol can make them discoverable. An agent framework can select an operation and generate arguments. But those pieces do not, by themselves, answer several business questions: Which operations may be exposed to an agent-facing surface? Which invocation must carry a trusted acting subject? Which operation is high consequence? When does an invocation express approval intent? Which calls need stronger audit handling? Which execution properties should a runtime know before it invokes the API? These questions sit between tool connectivity and final business authorization. That is the layer the Agent Capability Contract, or ACC, is designed to describe. Start with a concrete operation Consider this API operation: paths : /orders/{order_id}/refund : post : operationId : createRefund parameters : - in : path name : order_id required : true schema : type : string requestBody : required : true content : application/json : schema : type : object required : [ amount ] properties : amount : type : number minimum : 0 This is enough to describe how to call the operation. It is not enough to describe how an agent-facing system should treat it. ACC adds a small, machine-readable declaration next to the operation: x-agent-capability : version : 1 enabled : true scope : refund.create risk : level : high subject : required : true approval : required : true when : - param : amount op : " >" value : 1000 audit : sensitive : true execution : readonly : false idempotent : true timeout_ms : 10000 The declaration does not grant the refund. It tells a compatible runtime how the operation should be presented and governed before the business system receives the call. The miss

2026-07-15 原文 →
← 上一页 下一页 →