标签：#r

A tutorial series, DEV.to blog series — from your first HTML element to production-grade User Interfaces, all in pure Python. Modern Python web frameworks force developers into a split workflow: business logic lives in Python files with full IDE support, while presentation logic is exiled to template files that offer none of it. Template languages like Jinja2 introduce their own syntax for conditionals, loops, and variable access — syntax that your linter cannot check, your type checker cannot verify, and your debugger cannot step through. Every context variable passed across that boundary is a potential KeyError waiting to surface at runtime. Probo eliminates this divide entirely by making HTML a native Python construct — written, validated, and refactored with the same tools you already use for the rest of your codebase. PART 1: Introduction to Probo — Write HTML Entirely in Python What is Probo? Probo is a Python-first, declarative UI rendering framework . Instead of writing HTML in .html files or using template languages like Jinja2, you write everything in pure Python. No template files. No string concatenation. No f-strings full of angle brackets. Just Python functions and classes that are your HTML. The Two Flavors of Every Tag Every HTML tag in Probo comes in two forms: Flavor Example Returns Use Case Function (lowercase) div() , h1() , p() Rendered HTML Quick rendering, lightweight Class (uppercase) DIV() , H1() , P() SSDOM tree node Tree manipulation, streaming from probo import div , DIV # Function: returns a string immediately # return_list=True html_string = div ( " Hello World " ,) # → "<div>Hello World</div>" # Class: returns a tree node, call .render() to get the string node = DIV ( " Hello World " , Id = " main-title " ) # Because it's a Node, you can manipulate it dynamically node . add ( div ( " Subtitle added later! " )) html_string = node . render () # → '<div id="main-title">Hello World<div>Subtitle added later!</div></div>' Note: by adding ret

This button passes every automated accessibility scan we've thrown at it: <button class= "btn-primary" type= "button" > Check availability </button> And it breaks every AI agent that tries to book a room through it. The markup is clean: a real <button> , a proper accessible name from its text content, an explicit type . Nothing to flag. The failure isn't in the button, it's in what happens after the click. And no static scanner ever clicks. What a scanner actually sees Static accessibility scanners evaluate the DOM at a point in time. Usually the initial render: HTML parsed, framework hydrated, nothing interacted with. They check that state against WCAG rules, missing alt text, contrast ratios, label associations, heading order. That's genuinely useful. It's also a photograph of a lobby, when the task happens in the hallways. Here's what never appears in the initial DOM of a typical booking flow: The date picker that mounts when the check-in field receives focus The error message injected after a failed form submit The room-selection modal that opens on "Check availability" The loading state between "Book now" and the confirmation A scanner reports zero issues on all of these, for the simple reason that at scan time, none of them exist. What an agent actually traverses An AI agent completing a booking doesn't evaluate a snapshot. It walks the flow: reads the accessibility tree, decides on an action, performs it, waits for the interface to respond, reads the tree again. Every state transition is a place where the tree can lie to it. Let's look at three patterns we keep finding in real audits. All three pass static scans. All three stop an agent. 1. The modal that exists on screen but not in the tree { isOpen && ( < div className = "modal-overlay" > < div className = "modal" > < h2 > Select your room </ h2 > < RoomList rooms = { available } /> </ div > </ div > )} Visually: a modal. In the accessibility tree: a div soup appended somewhere in the body, with no role="di

True the Vote is working with a Detroit pastor to produce a new documentary called Trap, based on claims that have already been thrown out in court.

Users are creating accounts on your new Saas. Yay (and not just family and friends or bots). Yay! Now comes the next step from every marketing handbook: capturing newsletter subscriptions. This article builds on Add Sign Up to Rails 8’ Authentication . Add a simple checkbox to let users opt in to product updates during signup. Store their preference using Rails Vault and manage the subscription with Rails Courrier . First, add Rails Vault and Rails Courrier to your Gemfile: gem "rails_vault" gem "rails_courrier" Rails Vault adds simple and easy settings, preferences and so on to any ActiveRecord model (I recently pushed 1.0.0). Courrier is API-powered email delivery for Ruby apps with support for Mailgun, Postmark, Resend and more. Rails Courrier is the Rails “wrapper” for Courrier. These two gems work really nicely together for this feature. Run bundle install and generate the Rails Vault migration: rails generate rails_vault:install rails db:migrate It creates a new file app/models/user/subscriptions.rb : class User::Subscriptions < Vault vault_attribute :product_emails_subscribed_at , :datetime # Add more subscription types as needed: # vault_attribute :marketing_emails_subscribed_at, :datetime # vault_attribute :weekly_digest_subscribed_at, :datetime end And updates your User model to use this vault: # app/models/user.rb class User < ApplicationRecord + vault :subscriptions has_secure_password has_many :sessions , dependent: :destroy end This keeps subscription data organized without cluttering your User table. More subscription types can be added later without database migrations. Now the plumbing is done, add a checkbox to your signup form in app/views/signups/new.html.erb : <%= form . check_box :product_emails %> <%= form . label :product_emails , "Subscribe to product updates" %> Update the Signup model to accept this parameter: # app/models/signup.rb class Signup include ActiveModel :: Model include ActiveModel :: Attributes attribute :email_address , :stri

In this article, we're going to explore Event Schema evolution with Event versioning 10. Event Schemas Will Eventually Change No event schema stays the same forever. As businesses grow, regulations shift, products gain new features, and processes become more complex, the data shared between services must evolve as well. This evolution is not optional—it is a natural consequence of a system adapting to changing requirements. Many teams initially assume they can simply update an event whenever needed. This assumption may hold when there is only one producer and one consumer, but real-world systems rarely remain that simple. Over time, multiple consumers emerge, each with its own responsibilities and release cycles. A typical system often looks like this: OrderConfirmed | +------------------+-------------------+ | | | v v v Inventory Billing Notification | v Analytics | v Customer Insights Each consumer evolves independently. Some services may deploy updates weekly, while others might release changes quarterly. In some cases, consumers may even belong to external teams with entirely different priorities and timelines. Because of this, producers cannot assume that all consumers will upgrade simultaneously. Schema evolution, therefore, is not just about modifying data structures. It is fundamentally about maintaining compatibility across independently evolving systems. Compatibility Is More Important Than Version Numbers When discussing schema evolution, teams often focus immediately on versioning. While versioning is useful, compatibility is far more critical. Without compatibility, versioning alone cannot prevent system breakage. Consider the following event: { "orderId" : "ORD-1001" , "customerId" : "CUS-501" , "totalAmount" : 249.99 } Now imagine a new requirement introduces currency. One approach might replace the existing field entirely: { "orderId" : "ORD-1001" , "customerId" : "CUS-501" , "amount" : { "value" : 249.99 , "currency" : "USD" } } Although the data mo

This is an orthogonal question to whether LLMs have qualia (almost certainly no) and to the question of whether any hypothetical qualia would be in any way correlated with word choice (also almost certainly no), as opposed to mechanistic factors such as runtime and memory access patterns.

The tech world has spent the last year buzzing about the complete rewrite of the TypeScript compiler. Now that TypeScript 7.0 is officially out, the headline is clear: a native Go port delivering 8x to 12x build speedups and an instant editor experience. But if we look past the raw performance numbers, TypeScript 7.0 represents something much deeper. It is the most aggressive modernization sweep in the language's history. The TypeScript team used this architectural migration to eliminate a decade of technical debt, kill off legacy web standards, and restructure how the compiler interacts with the JavaScript ecosystem. If you are planning to upgrade your frontend or backend repositories, here is what actually matters, why the team chose Go, and the breaking changes you need to prepare for. 1. The Architectural Plot Twist: Why Go and Not Rust? When Microsoft first announced they were moving away from a bootstrapped JavaScript compiler to a native binary, the collective internet assumed they would choose Rust—the darling of the modern frontend tooling space (used by SWC, Turbo, and Oxc). Instead, the team chose Go , sparking heavy debate across the community. The reasoning reveals exactly how the TS team prioritizes stability over absolute micro-benchmarks: Bug-for-Bug Compatibility: The goal wasn't to write a brand-new compiler from scratch; it was a 1:1 faithful translation of the massive, decade-old TypeScript codebase. Go’s straightforward syntax allowed a clean mapping of existing JavaScript logic. The Memory Model Challenge: Compilers are inherently full of deeply nested, circular object graphs (ASTs, symbol tables, type structures). Managing these in Rust without heavily leaning on unsafe blocks or running into a brick wall with the borrow checker would have taken years. Garbage Collection Alignment: Go’s built-in garbage collection mirrors JavaScript’s memory model elegantly. This allowed the team to achieve multi-threaded parallelism safely and ship a stable p

Hi everyone! I’m a developer at the beginning of my journey, and I’ve just finished working on a small project that brought me a lot of joy: Capybara Game. It’s a cute game where you feed your capybara and improve her happiness level. You can choose between 5 different types of food or pick your own snack. If the capybara likes the snack, her happiness level rises; if she doesn't like it, the happiness level falls. Your progress is saved automatically. Keep in mind that your capybara gets hungry over time, so make sure to check back and feed her regularly! I went for a minimalist, cozy design. The interface is clean and intuitive, focusing on a relaxing user experience that lets the player focus entirely on the capybara. I built this project using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Hope you're interested in playing! You can do it here: Play the game here I’d love to hear your thoughts! If you have any ideas for new features or if you find any bugs, feel free to let me know in the comments.

TL;DR Welcome back to Dev Opportunity Radar. This is a weekly series where I share opportunities,...

The CEO of Foundation Future Industries, which counts the president’s son as its chief strategy adviser, tells WIRED it’s exploring some “kinetic things.”

QCon AI Boston 2026 focused on the operational challenges of deploying AI agents, emphasizing the need for robust production infrastructure. Key themes included improving context management, ensuring security through a "harness" around agents, and adopting a comprehensive engineering model for AI. By Tatiana Fesenko

Perimenopause has entered the chat. Perimenopause—and its better-known relative, menopause—used to be considered taboo. Not anymore, thanks at least in part to TV doctors and social media influencers. Perhaps it’s my age, but these days, both my algorithm and my conversations with friends increasingly swing toward perimenopause. Menopause is defined as the life stage that…

Every morning, airline dispatchers, grid operators, and farmers around the world make decisions based on the same thing: a weather forecast. While these forecasts are something that most people glance at for two seconds, weather predictions influence major strategic decisions in many industries, with real money, livelihoods, and even actual lives at stake. Farmers use…

submitted by /u/_shadowbannedagain [link] [留言]

Coca-Cola halts the US operations of its dairy company fairlife due to a ransomware attack.

A practical, end-to-end walkthrough of taking a read-only slice of an enterprise source system and exposing it to an AI agent as a set of Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools — using Azure Logic Apps, API Management, and Agent Foundry. All identifiers below are placeholders; swap in your own. The goal We wanted a simple outcome: a user asks a business question in plain language and gets a straight answer — no dashboards, no field names, no training on the underlying system. That means an AI agent with safe, read-only access to a backend system of record, exposed as discrete tools the model can call. The constraints shaped every decision: Read-only. The agent can retrieve and analyze, never write. Safe. Records in most business systems contain free text (notes, subjects, descriptions) that could carry prompt-injection payloads. Tool output must be treated as data, never instructions. Composable. The agent should see many small, well-described tools — "list records", "aggregate by category", "record change history" — not one giant "query the system" tool. The architecture Five layers, one direction of flow: Agent (Agent Foundry) │ MCP (JSON-RPC over HTTP) ▼ MCP server (API Management) │ REST operation per tool ▼ API gateway (API Management) │ single POST, routed by body ▼ Tool executor (Logic App) │ OAuth token + REST calls ▼ Source system (REST API) The key design choice: one backend endpoint, many logical tools. The Logic App exposes a single HTTP trigger that accepts { "tool": "records.list", "parameters": { ... } } and routes internally. API Management then fans that single endpoint out into many named operations, and its MCP feature turns those operations into agent tools. This keeps the backend trivial to maintain while the agent still sees a rich, typed tool catalog. Step 1 — Design the tools Start from the questions , not the schema. A useful toolset usually falls into a few families: Records: list / get / search / filter for the core business entities. Activity