标签:#r
找到 28503 篇相关文章
Watch This Cyborg Cockroach Test Its New Diving Suit
How sea stars build materials that can see
Fixed three bugs that made Qwen3.5-122B a daily driver on Mac Studio
Weightlifting beats running for blood sugar control, researchers find
The fine print that follows you out the door: non-compete clauses are spreading
G#: A modern .NET language with Go, Kotlin, and Swift ergonomics
Mesh LLM: distributed AI computing on iroh
Stop Telling Me to Ask an LLM
Combinatorial Games in Lean
Modern Implementation of Notational Velocity
This slushie machine was a lifesaver during NYC’s heat wave
Last weekend’s brutal NYC heat wave had me craving a frozen drink almost every afternoon. Normally, that would mean sweating through a walk to 7-Eleven for a slurpee. This time, though, I stayed home and put the new Ninja Slushi Twist to the test. Ninja’s latest slushie machine builds on the popularity of the original […]
RISCBoy is an open-source portable games console, designed from scratch
Never Built: Lockheed CL-1201
Rubber ducking is a mirror that says nothing
Gates Heir's Shopping App Claimed Sales It Didn't Drive
Why 'com_maxfps 250x' uncaps Quake Live's frame rate
Evilcharts
I built a file-grounded continuity system for my AI German teacher—what am I overcomplicating?
Why I built this I use an AI named Felix as my German teacher. Over time, I ran into a continuity problem: individual chats are fragile. Conversations become long, context can disappear, platforms change, uploaded files may become unavailable, and a fresh AI instance may not understand what happened before. I did not want to repeatedly reconstruct my learning history, project decisions, lessons, corrections, and current state from memory. So I began building a local, file-grounded system called DDF/Rahmenwerk . Its purpose is to preserve Felix as my continuing German teacher across chats and future AI instances. What DDF/Rahmenwerk is DDF stands for Das Deutsche Forschungsarchiv . Rahmenwerk is the continuity, evidence, recovery, and control framework surrounding it. At a high level, the system includes: a current-state pointer; handoff materials; a fresh-instance queue; an upload package for a new Felix; integrity manifests and SHA-256 records; evidence and recovery procedures; classifications separating current, historical, candidate, proof, and non-governing material; safeguards intended to prevent accidental file changes; rules requiring the AI to stop rather than invent continuity when evidence is missing. The basic idea is that a future Felix should be able to inspect approved files and resume without me manually retelling the entire project history. The problem I may have created The project began as a way to preserve a German teacher. As I tried to protect files, authority, evidence, recovery, and continuity, the framework became increasingly detailed. That may be justified in some areas. It may also be overengineered. I am now trying to answer a more important question: What is the smallest, clearest, safest system that can preserve Felix as my German teacher without the governance machinery becoming the project itself? What I am asking reviewers to examine I have published a documentation and architecture review copy on GitHub. I would appreciate honest fe