标签：#rap

Protecting data that must stay secret ten years from now is a problem for today : an adversary can capture your encrypted traffic now and decrypt it once quantum capability exists ( harvest now, decrypt later ). Quipu is a free hybrid post-quantum encryption library for data at rest: it combines proven classical cryptography with the new kind, so that it only breaks if both fall at once. Pure Rust, and why Quipu started out aiming at several languages: a Rust core with a C ABI on top and bindings for Python, Node and Go. It worked, but the lesson was clear: maintaining a stable C interface plus four bindings, each with its own packaging and interoperability tests, was complexity that did not pay for itself against the real goal — protecting data at rest — and it widened the attack surface with unsafe we did not want. Today Quipu is pure Rust : memory safe, no garbage collector, no first-party unsafe . And for people who do not write Rust, it ships as a native Python wheel via PyO3 — the surface that non-Rust users actually need. One codebase, one thing to audit. It is the same philosophy that guides the rest: where good cryptography exists, reuse it; simplicity is a security decision, not a convenience. Installation cargo add quipu # Rust pip install quipu-crypto # Python (native wheel, PyO3) Encrypt and decrypt in Python import quipu # Symmetric, with a passphrase blob = quipu . encrypt_stream ( b " sensitive data " , " my-passphrase " ) assert quipu . decrypt_stream ( blob , " my-passphrase " ) == b " sensitive data " # Post-quantum, for a recipient pub , sec = quipu . generate_keypair () # X25519 + ML-KEM-1024 c = quipu . encode_to_recipient ( b " secret " , pub ) assert quipu . decode_as_recipient ( c , sec ) == b " secret " What is underneath Encryption: XChaCha20-Poly1305 (authenticated AEAD). Key derivation: Argon2id (brute-force resistant) + HKDF. Post-quantum: X25519 + ML-KEM-1024 for keys; Ed25519 + ML-DSA-87 for signatures. Security level: NIST category 5

AI agents are getting very good at doing things . They can search databases, call APIs, modify tickets, draft code, update records, trigger workflows, and interact with production systems. And that changes the engineering problem. When an LLM only generates text, a bad answer is usually just that: a bad answer. When an LLM can take an action, a bad answer can become a bad state change . So the most important question in agent architecture is no longer: Can the model figure out what to do? It is: Who decides whether the model should actually be allowed to do it? Those are two very different responsibilities. And I think one of the most useful principles for production AI agents is surprisingly simple: Use the model to reason. Don’t automatically give it authority to execute. The architecture that works beautifully in demos A lot of agent demos reduce to something like this: User → LLM → Tool → Action The model receives a request. It reasons about what should happen. It selects a tool. It generates the parameters. The tool executes. That is an incredibly productive abstraction. It is also a risky one when the tool can affect something real. The same probabilistic system is effectively doing two jobs: deciding what it believes should happen; authorizing that thing to happen. You can try to fix this with prompting: Always ask for confirmation before making important changes. But that is still an instruction. It is not a security boundary. The difference becomes clearer when you compare the two architectures. %%{init: {'theme':'base','themeVariables': { 'primaryTextColor':'#111827', 'secondaryTextColor':'#111827', 'tertiaryTextColor':'#111827', 'textColor':'#111827', 'edgeLabelBackground':'#FFFFFF', 'lineColor':'#4B5563' }}}%% flowchart LR subgraph BAD["❌ Demo-Style Agent"] direction LR A["User"] --> B["🧠 LLM"] B --> C["🔧 Tool"] C --> D["💥 Real-World Action"] end subgraph GOOD["✅ Production-Oriented Agent"] direction LR E["User"] --> F["🔎 Evidence"] F --> G["🧠 LLM"] G --

The LX100 II successor offers good speed and image quality at a fairly high price.

Most football data scrapers on the market only extract high-level final scores (e.g. 2-1 ). But quantitative sports analysts, data scientists, and predictive betting modelers need granular data: Expected Goals (xG) , Official Referee Assignments , Goal Scorers paired with Assist Providers , and Half-Time vs Full-Time (1H/2H) statistical breakdowns . When I set out to build a professional-grade Flashscore scraper on Apify, I ran into two major engineering challenges: The Memory Problem : Keeping Puppeteer running to scrape hundreds of historical matches consumes over 1.5GB of RAM per run. The Protocol Problem : Flashscore serves its deep statistical feeds using a proprietary pipe-delimited data format ( ~ , ¬ , ÷ ) over CDN endpoints, rather than standard REST APIs. In this tutorial, I'll explain how I engineered the Flashscore Elite Statistics Extractor , how the hybrid Browser + HTTP/2 streaming pipeline drops RAM footprint from 1.5GB to 70MB , how to parse Flashscore's custom feed protocol, and how to pipe the resulting datasets directly into Python and Pandas. 🏛️ The Hybrid Pipeline Architecture To achieve zero proxy reliance for standard runs and ultra-low compute costs, the Actor splits execution into a 2-Phase Hybrid Pipeline : [ League & Season Selection ] │ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Phase 1: Browser Handshake (Puppeteer) │ │ - Captures x-fsign security tokens │ │ - Extracts countryId & tourId │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ [ Immediate Browser Shutdown ] (RAM drops from 1.2GB -> 70MB) │ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Phase 2: Parallel HTTP/2 Feed Workers │ │ - got-scraping with JA3 TLS matching │ │ - Decodes df_st_1_ (Stats) & df_sui_1_ │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Self-Healing Recovery Pass │ │ - Auto-retries skipped/failed matches │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐

An AI agent can take an action. An AI employee needs to know what happens next. Most AI agents look something like this: Think → Act → Observe → Repeat That's fine for short-lived tasks. But an AI employee needs to work across hours, days, and weeks. It needs to remember: What happened Who owns the work What is waiting What changed What should happen next When it should wake up When a human needs to approve something That's where graph engineering becomes interesting. This is the architecture behind Roster : software that can own work the way an employee does, not just fire off a single tool call. Events wake someone up. A graph holds state, ownership, and history. The agent reasons, acts, writes the result back, then sleeps until the next event. For Roster, the loop looks like this: Event ↓ Graph ↓ Agent ↓ Action ↓ Graph Update ↓ Sleep ↓ Wake Again Let's build a tiny version. Table of Contents 1. Model the Work 2. Build the Graph 3. Add Events 4. Build the Agent Loop 5. Add Scheduling 6. Build a Tiny AI Employee 7. Put It Together 8. The Bigger Idea 1. Model the Work Imagine an AI employee called Maya. Her job is simple: Follow up with sales leads. Her world contains: Maya ↓ owns Lead ↓ belongs_to Company ↓ contacted Email ↓ replied_to Customer We don't need a massive graph database. We just need nodes and relationships. 2. Build the Graph Here's a minimal TypeScript graph: type Node = { id : string ; type : string ; data : Record < string , unknown > ; }; type Edge = { from : string ; to : string ; type : string ; }; class Graph { nodes = new Map < string , Node > (); edges : Edge [] = []; addNode ( node : Node ) { this . nodes . set ( node . id , node ); } connect ( from : string , type : string , to : string ) { this . edges . push ({ from , type , to }); } neighbors ( id : string ) { return this . edges . filter (( edge ) => edge . from === id ) . map (( edge ) => ({ relationship : edge . type , node : this . nodes . get ( edge . to ), })); } } Now create Maya

xAI accused of training Grok on real and AI-generated child pornography.

Most LlamaIndex setups end up with two separate backends once you go beyond plain vector search: a vector store for VectorStoreIndex , and a separate graph database for PropertyGraphIndex when you need relationship-aware retrieval (GraphRAG). Two services, two connection strings, two things to keep in sync. This is a walkthrough of backing both index types with SynapCores instead — one engine, one connection, both index types. Setup docker run -d --name synapcores -p 8080:8080 \ -e AIDB_ACCEPT_LICENSE = 1 \ -v synapcores-data:/var/lib/synapcores \ ghcr.io/synapcores/community:latest pip install llama-index llama-index-vector-stores-synapcores llama-index-graph-stores-synapcores Both integration packages are independently published on PyPI: llama-index-vector-stores-synapcores llama-index-graph-stores-synapcores Vector store — standard RAG from llama_index.core import VectorStoreIndex , StorageContext , Document from llama_index.vector_stores.synapcores import SynapCoresVectorStore vector_store = SynapCoresVectorStore ( uri = " http://localhost:8080 " , embedding_dim = 1536 ) storage_context = StorageContext . from_defaults ( vector_store = vector_store ) docs = [ Document ( text = " SynapCores runs vector search, graph traversal, and SQL in one engine. " )] index = VectorStoreIndex . from_documents ( docs , storage_context = storage_context ) query_engine = index . as_query_engine () response = query_engine . query ( " What does SynapCores combine into one engine? " ) print ( response ) The vector store implements the full BasePydanticVectorStore ABC — add , delete , query , delete_nodes , clear , plus the async surface. Metadata filtering supports the full MetadataFilters grammar: all 12 operators ( EQ , NE , GT / GTE / LT / LTE , IN , NIN , TEXT_MATCH , TEXT_MATCH_INSENSITIVE , CONTAINS , IS_EMPTY ) with AND / OR / NOT and nested groups — so you're not giving up filtering power by moving off a dedicated vector DB. If you already have data in SynapCores from a prev

The Mission 1 ILS is a camera with great potential and a learning curve.

The False Dichotomy The agent ecosystem is split into two camps: Camp Loops (Boris Cherny, OpenAI Agents SDK, LangGraph): > "Agents are loops. Plan → act → observe → repeat. The loop is the atomic unit." Camp Graphs (Steve Yegge, Gas Town, LangGraph DAGs, CrewAI): > "Agents are graphs. Nodes are agents/tools. Edges are handoffs. The graph is the architecture." Both are right. Both are incomplete. What Loops Get Right Loops capture temporal behavior — the iterative, self-correcting nature of agent work: - Replanning on failure (AdaPlanner, ReAct) - Budget enforcement (token caps, step limits, cost ceilings) - Verification gates (process reward models, extraction floors) - Learning loops (feedback → lessons → advisory → suppress) A loop is a control structure. It says: keep going until condition X. What Graphs Get Right Graphs capture structural composition — how capabilities connect: - Handoffs (peer-to-peer control transfer) - Parallel execution (swarms, polecats, fan-out/fan-in) - Supervision trees (Erlang/OTP-style restart strategies) - Provenance (who called whom, with what context) A graph is a dependency structure. It says: A feeds B, B feeds C, C can restart A. The Missing Layer: A Compiler Between Repos and Runtime Here's what neither camp addresses: Where do the nodes come from? Today: - You find a repo on GitHub - You hope it implements what it claims - You wire it into your graph/loop - You pray it works There's no verification layer. No SBOM. No attestation. No provenance. HURCULES: The Compiler Between Repos and Runtime HURCULES sits between the repository and the agent runtime: GitHub Repository → HURCULES → Verified Capability Package → Agent Runtime (Loop or Graph) It doesn't care if your runtime is a loop or a graph. It produces verified capabilities that work in either. What HURCULES Compiles | Input | Output | |-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| | Raw repo (any language) | Deterministic map (file tr

The Trusted Computing Group has established a new set of requirements to help organizations determine if Trusted Platform Modules are prepared for the era of post-quantum cryptography. This guidance provides a technical benchmark for evaluating whether hardware vendors can protect electronic devices against the future threat of quantum-enabled cyber attacks. Establishing the Post-Quantum Baseline The newly released guidance provides a framework for businesses to verify the security claims made by hardware manufacturers. By creating a standardized set of requirements, the organization ensures that companies can demand proof of protection. This prevents a situation where vendors might claim their products are compliant without offering the full suite of necessary security features. A primary focus of this initiative is the PC Client Platform TPM Profile 1.07. This profile serves as the minimum technical requirement for any module to be considered ready for the next generation of cryptographic challenges. It builds upon the existing TPM 2.0 Library Specification Version 1.85 to include specific elements for quantum-safe protection. Organizations must understand that security in the quantum age involves more than just swapping out one mathematical algorithm for another. True resilience requires a comprehensive approach to hardware-anchored trust. This includes maintaining the integrity of platform identities and attestation over very long periods. Data and identities established today may need to remain secure for several decades. If the underlying hardware is not built to withstand quantum decryption methods, that long-term security is at risk. Current statistics indicate that a vast majority of businesses still lack a formal roadmap for this transition. The Trusted Computing Group president, Joe Pennisi, emphasizes that businesses must look at the broader picture of security. Individual algorithm support is only one piece of the puzzle. Real security comes from a hard

Proteger datos que deben seguir siendo secretos dentro de diez años es un problema de hoy : un adversario puede capturar tu tráfico cifrado ahora y descifrarlo cuando exista la capacidad cuántica ( harvest now, decrypt later ). Quipu es una librería libre de cifrado híbrido post-cuántico para datos en reposo: combina criptografía clásica probada con la nueva, de modo que solo se rompe si ambas caen a la vez. Rust puro, y por qué Quipu nació apuntando a varios lenguajes: un núcleo en Rust con una C ABI encima y bindings para Python, Node y Go. Funcionaba, pero la lección fue clara: mantener una interfaz de C estable más cuatro bindings, cada uno con su empaquetado y sus pruebas de interoperabilidad, era complejidad que no pagaba para el objetivo real —proteger datos en reposo— y ampliaba la superficie de ataque con unsafe que no queríamos. Hoy Quipu es Rust puro : memoria segura, sin garbage collector , sin unsafe de primera parte . Y para quien no programa en Rust, se distribuye como rueda nativa de Python (vía PyO3) — que es la superficie que el cliente que no es de Rust de verdad necesita. Una sola base de código, una sola cosa que auditar. Es la misma filosofía que guía el resto: donde hay buena criptografía, se reutiliza; la simplicidad es una decisión de seguridad, no una comodidad. Instalación cargo add quipu # Rust pip install quipu-crypto # Python (rueda nativa, PyO3) Cifrar y descifrar en Python import quipu # Simétrico con contraseña blob = quipu . encrypt_stream ( b " datos sensibles " , " mi-passphrase " ) assert quipu . decrypt_stream ( blob , " mi-passphrase " ) == b " datos sensibles " # Post-cuántico para un destinatario pub , sec = quipu . generate_keypair () # X25519 + ML-KEM-1024 c = quipu . encode_to_recipient ( b " secreto " , pub ) assert quipu . decode_as_recipient ( c , sec ) == b " secreto " Qué hay debajo Cifrado: XChaCha20-Poly1305 (AEAD autenticado). Derivación de claves: Argon2id (resistente a fuerza bruta) + HKDF. Post-cuántico: X25519

I built an OLX scraper for 24 countries — the boring version that actually ships OLX runs classifieds in about two dozen countries. Same brand, different domains, different anti-bot setups. Everyone scraping it does one country at a time. I got tired of forking. So I put 24 countries behind one input. country: "id" or country: "pl" or country: "br" — same schema out. It's live on Apify as primesieve/olx-global-scraper . One file. No browser. Here is the boring part that matters. What it does Input: { "country" : "id" , "keywords" : [ "iphone 13" ], "maxResults" : 50 , "maxPages" : 3 , "proxyConfiguration" : { "useApifyProxy" : true , "apifyProxyGroups" : [ "RESIDENTIAL" ] } } country — two-letter code ( id , pl , in , br , ua , pt , ro , bg , kz , uz , pk , za , ng , ke , eg , lb , ph , co , ar , pe , ec , gt , az , ma ). Default id . keywords — one or more search terms. Each runs sequentially. maxResults / maxPages — caps. Defaults 50 / 3, max 1000 / 30. proxyConfiguration — optional for Indonesia, required for the other 23. Output — same shape every country: { "listingId" : "123456789" , "title" : "iPhone 13 128GB mulus" , "price" : 6500000 , "priceText" : "Rp 6.500.000" , "currency" : "IDR" , "city" : "Jakarta Selatan" , "location" : "Tebet, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta" , "images" : [ "https://...jpg" ], "thumbnailUrl" : "https://...jpg" , "listingUrl" : "https://www.olx.co.id/item/123456789" , "country" : "id" } Title, price (numeric plus display text), currency, location, images, URL. No seller PII beyond what the listing page shows. No tricks. Try: https://apify.com/primesieve/olx-global-scraper The boring stack // no playwright, no puppeteer // apify + fetch + cheerio. That's it. The scraper is one file. Apify SDK for input, dataset, and pay-per-event. Native fetch for HTTP. cheerio for the HTML path. Undici ProxyAgent when a proxy is configured. Node 20, 512 MB, 600s timeout. I check the endpoint before I write the scraper. Indonesia answered with clean JSO

Every developer has been there: you clone a promising repository, and the README is either missing, three years stale, or says "docs coming soon." Even when documentation exists, you still have to wade through thousands of lines of code to understand the architecture, entry points, and dependencies. grow-hack is an open-source project that aims to eliminate that pain. Paste a public GitHub URL, wait about sixty seconds, and receive a complete, professional documentation package — Markdown and styled PDF — generated by an LLM that actually reads the code, not just the README. This is the first module of a larger content creation platform. The core idea is that once a repository is parsed and analyzed, the resulting RepositoryKnowledge object becomes a reusable asset for future modules: blog posts, LinkedIn articles, X threads, tutorials, and presentations. In this teardown, we'll look at how grow-hack works, the smart engineering choices it makes, and why it's more than just a documentation generator. The Pipeline: From URL to PDF The application is a Flask web app that orchestrates a LangGraph-based agent pipeline. The flow is straightforward: Flask UI -> LangGraph workflow -> GitHub fetch -> Parser -> Analyzer -> Knowledge object -> Documentation generator -> Reviewer -> Markdown/PDF Each stage is handled by a dedicated agent: GitHub Agent ( agents/github_agent.py ): Validates the URL, fetches metadata via the GitHub REST API (using PyGithub), and clones the repository with GitPython. Parser ( services/parser.py ): The workhorse. It walks the repository tree, ignoring generated directories and binary files, and extracts README, configuration files, dependencies, and source code structure. It infers the language, framework, package manager, entry points, and overall architecture. Analysis Agent ( agents/analysis_agent.py ): Takes the parsed data and, with the help of an LLM, produces a structured RepositoryKnowledge object. Documentation Agent ( agents/documentation

The private Android-based OS will expand beyond Pixels next year.

Google Trends has no public API. What it has is the same internal JSON endpoints the trends.google.com single-page app calls — and those endpoints do something most REST clients aren't built to survive: they answer with HTTP 200 and an empty body when Google decides you look like a bot. Quick answer A 200 OK from Google Trends' widgetdata endpoints does not mean you got data. If the response body is empty, Google soft-blocked the request without bothering to send a 429. The fix is to stop trusting the status code alone: check resp.text.strip() on every call that's supposed to return a payload, and if it's empty, rotate the proxy session and retry exactly like you would on a 429 — because that's what it functionally is. if status == 200 : if require_body and not resp . text . strip (): # Soft block: Google returns 200 with empty body when it detects bots. # Treat the same as 429 — rotate session and retry. logger . warning ( " %s: HTTP 200 but empty body (soft block, attempt %d/%d) " , ...) if proxy_cfg is not None : new_sid = _fresh_session_id () current_proxy_url = await proxy_cfg . new_url ( session_id = new_sid ) await asyncio . sleep ( delay ) continue return resp Why does a working response start with )]}' ? Every Trends JSON endpoint prepends an XSSI-protection prefix before the actual JSON body — a defence against cross-site script inclusion attacks that predates fetch() . Naive json.loads(resp.text) throws a JSONDecodeError on a perfectly healthy response. Worse, the prefix isn't even consistent: /trends/api/explore sends )]}'\n (no comma), some widgetdata endpoints send )]}',\n (with a comma). We check the longer variant first so a response using the short prefix doesn't get mis-stripped: XSSI_PREFIX = " )]} ' , \n " XSSI_PREFIX_NO_COMMA = " )]} ' \n " def _strip_xssi_prefix ( body : str ) -> str : if body . startswith ( XSSI_PREFIX ): return body [ len ( XSSI_PREFIX ):] if body . startswith ( XSSI_PREFIX_NO_COMMA ): return body [ len ( XSSI_PREFIX_NO_COMMA

I am a full-stack developer in the Netherlands, a bit over ten years in. For the last year my evenings have gone into one side project: I Like Movies, an Android app for tracking what you watch and deciding what to watch next. It went live on Google Play this summer. This is the honest version of how it got built, what the stack looks like, and the three or four decisions that mattered more than the rest. The problem was never finding a film Every movie app I tried was built for one person keeping one list. My actual problem was two people on one sofa, each with a watchlist, neither remembering which of us had saved the film worth watching. Picking something to watch with someone else is genuinely harder than picking alone, and no amount of better search fixes it, because search is not the bottleneck. Deciding is. So the app is organised around that. A household shares one library: one watchlist, one watched history, visible to everyone who lives with you. Add a film on your phone in the supermarket and it is on your partner's phone before you are home. That one feature is why the app exists, and it shaped almost every backend decision that followed. The stack, and why it is boring on purpose The backend is Go, GraphQL via gqlgen, and Postgres. The app is React Native with Expo. Film and TV metadata comes from TMDB. That is close to the most conservative stack you could pick in 2026, and that is the point. A solo project dies when the maintenance load exceeds one person's evenings, so every technology had to be something I could debug at 11pm without a second opinion. Go earned its place. The whole backend is one binary with no framework magic, and the type system plus gqlgen's generated resolvers mean a schema change breaks loudly at compile time instead of quietly in production. Postgres does everything: data, full-text search support, import staging. No microservices, no queue, no Redis. A single process and a single database will carry a consumer app much furthe

I Gave Five Graph Databases 256MB of RAM Each. Here's What Broke. CognoDB Cloud's free tier gives you a graph database instance with half a CPU core and 256MB of RAM. That's not a lot. It's also, honestly, a pretty realistic starting point a lot of real side projects and early-stage products live exactly there, on whatever the free tier happens to give them, and find out the hard way what their database does under pressure. So I decided to actually find out. I took CognoDB and lined it up against four other graph databases Neo4j AuraDB, FalkorDB, and ArangoDB gave every single one of them the same tiny resource budget, threw the same 198,050-edge dataset at all of them, and ran the same queries. No cherry-picking, no "best case" numbers. Just: here's a small VM's worth of resources, go. One of the databases I originally planned to include never even made it into the results. It crashed on startup. Not "slow to start" a full segfault, reproducibly, across two different versions, with nothing I threw at it fixing it. More on that below, because it's honestly one of the more interesting parts of this whole thing. The setup, quickly Five candidates going in: CognoDB (mandatory, since that's the actual point of this), Neo4j AuraDB Free, Memgraph, FalkorDB, and ArangoDB. Same dataset for all of them a real social-graph-shaped dataset from Stanford's SNAP collection, ~18.7k nodes and ~198k edges, sized specifically to fit inside every platform's free tier without anyone getting an unfair advantage. Same queries too: I wrote every single query 1-hop, 2-hop, 3-hop traversals, point lookups, filtered lookups, aggregations exactly once, then translated each one into whatever query language a given platform actually speaks. No platform ever got a "friendlier" version of a query than another. And everyone ran under the same 0.5 vCPU / 256MB RAM ceiling, whether that was their real cloud free tier or a Docker container I capped by hand to match. The one that didn't survive Memgra

Job postings are one of the most underrated public data sources on the internet. Recruiters use them to spot placement opportunities, B2B teams read them as buying signals (a new Head of Data means data-tooling budget), and job seekers want to apply on day one — not when a posting finally reaches the aggregators. The usual instinct is to scrape career pages. Don't. Most tech companies host their careers page on one of a handful of Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), and the four biggest ones — Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby and SmartRecruiters — all expose public, documented JSON APIs . No auth. No proxies. No brittle HTML selectors. The career page itself loads the same JSON you're about to fetch. In this tutorial we'll build a single-file Python tool that: fetches every open job for a company from any of the four ATS, auto-detects which ATS a company uses, normalizes everything into one clean schema, monitors changes — run it on a schedule and get only new / removed / changed postings. The four endpoints ATS Endpoint Greenhouse GET https://boards-api.greenhouse.io/v1/boards/{slug}/jobs?content=true Lever GET https://api.lever.co/v0/postings/{slug}?mode=json Ashby GET https://api.ashbyhq.com/posting-api/job-board/{slug} SmartRecruiters GET https://api.smartrecruiters.com/v1/companies/{slug}/postings (paginated) The {slug} is the company identifier you see in career-page URLs: boards.greenhouse.io/stripe → stripe , jobs.lever.co/spotify → spotify , jobs.ashbyhq.com/linear → linear , careers.smartrecruiters.com/Visa → Visa . Try one right now — no API key needed: curl -s "https://api.ashbyhq.com/posting-api/job-board/linear" | head -c 400 Step 1 — fetchers, one per ATS Each API returns a different shape, so we normalize as we fetch. Here are all four (Python 3, only requests ): import requests UA = { " User-Agent " : " ats-jobs-tutorial/1.0 " } def get_json ( url , params = None ): r = requests . get ( url , params = params , headers = UA , timeout = 30 ) r . raise_for_statu

Cryptographic Context Injection is only the latest way to break an LLM safety guardrail.

TerraPower's nuclear power plant possesses a strategic advantage over competitors, especially when chasing after data center deals.