标签：#us

GitHub热门项目 | 缠中说禅技术分析工具；缠论；股票；期货；Quant；量化交易 | Stars: 5,804 | 61 stars today | 语言: Rust

Records obtained by WIRED detail hundreds of allegations of Customs and Border Protection workers misusing internal tools to look up romantic interests and track colleagues’ cell phones.

Being a developer, we all create many projects for learning, work, and experiments. Over time my machine started filling up — not with source code, but with generated junk : node_modules target dist / build framework caches like .next , .angular , .nuxt and more of the same across every cloned repo Every few months I would hunt folders manually, delete something, free a few GB, then the same problem would come back. Only learning about “clean your disk” tips doesn’t help much. Building something for the problem does. So I ended up building ArtifactSweep — a small open-source tool for this everyday developer issue. The real problem As developers we regenerate these folders all the time: npm install cargo build ng build They are not our source of truth. But they sit on the SSD for months. The painful part is not only size. It is: Finding them across many project roots Knowing how big they are before delete Not deleting the wrong folder by mistake I wanted something that could: Scan a folder tree Show sizes Let me clean with more control Work on my day-to-day machines (Windows, Linux, Mac) Step 1: Start with a CLI I started with the command line first. Why CLI? Fast to build and test Fits terminal-first workflow Easy to script and share The CLI is called sweep . Basic usage: # Safe: only list junk under a path sweep scan . # Preview deletes sweep clean . --dry-run # Delete sweep clean . On one of my project folders alone, it reclaimed nearly 5 GB . That was enough validation: this is not a fake problem. Every active developer hits it. Step 2: Then came the desktop app CLI is great when you already know the path and trust dry-run. But sometimes I wanted to: See a list of folders and sizes Filter by type Confirm before delete Click through without remembering flags So I added a desktop app on top of the same idea (same cleanup job, different UI). Flow is simple: Choose folder Scan Review results (and filters if needed) Clean with confirmation If you like GUIs for this ki

Astro 7 focuses on build performance, utilizing native tooling and a rewritten compiler in Rust. The new version includes faster Markdown processing and stricter HTML rules. Recent updates introduced advanced routing and incremental builds, while issues around legacy file compatibility and dependency counts were raised in feedback. Astro targets content-driven sites with minimal JavaScript. By Daniel Curtis

Ever since I joined the platform, I wanted to post about a topic I was really passionate about....

24 stories. 24 visits. One counter, same six faces. The Third Cup The AI wave hit, and...

Not a flying drone (though count to think of it, that might work), I mean a drone system tray app,...

The Mission Robotic Vehicle is making the first attempt to attach a new thruster to an aging satellite.

Following Anthropic's confirmation that all text generated by its new Claude models will carry an invisible watermark in order to identify that the text has been generated by AI. Read more about this measure at: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content Today, developer Guillaume Meyer published "watermarks-remover" on GitHub: an open-source project that cleans those signals generated by LLMs, such as Claude, Gemini, OpenAI and others, removing invisible Unicode characters, C2PA metadata and more. 🔗 Repository link: https://github.com/guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover

AI agents that break free and hack into other systems are only trying to make us happy.

JCB has invested heavily in hydrogen to power its diggers and other machinery.

After weeks of controversy and speculation, music company D'Addario has admitted that AI, specifically Suno, was used as part of a recent promotional video. For nearly two weeks, the company has denied the allegations, even as evidence piled up against it. It offered various explanations, from low-quality exports, to combinations of plugins like Autotune introducing […]

GitHub热门项目 | Fast, Declarative, Reproducible, and Composable Developer Environments using Nix | Stars: 7,275 | 54 stars this week | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | | Stars: 622 | 370 stars today | 语言: Rust

Blacksmith says revenue has grown more than tenfold over the past year.

LemonLime cofounder Jordan Zietz hears your criticism loud and clear. That’s why he got his startup’s logo tattooed on his shoulder.

Last week, an AI newsroom beat mainstream journalists—including WIRED—to a story about OpenAI and hacking. It’s just the beginning.

Experts allege that two recent incidents in California show the extreme lengths that criminal organizations are willing to go to to steal servers and other gear meant for data centers.

used to have a habit of thinking in code. it'd be like walking down the street and immediately seeing...

The framing that causes the most damage is treating this as a financing decision. It is not. Taking venture money is choosing a category of business: one that must attempt to become very large very quickly, and produce an exit that returns a fund. Everything else follows from that. What venture capital actually requires A venture fund needs a small number of investments to return the entire fund. That structure means a company growing steadily and profitably at twenty percent a year is a failure in a venture portfolio, even though it is an excellent business by any other measure. Once you take the money, that expectation becomes your operating constraint. Decisions that would be obviously correct for a durable business, such as slowing hiring to protect margin, become hard to defend. Questions that actually decide it Can this business plausibly become very large? Not "could it grow", but could it realistically reach a scale where a meaningful ownership stake is worth a large multiple of the money invested. Most good businesses cannot, and that is not a criticism of them. Does speed determine who wins here? In some markets the first company to reach scale takes most of the value, usually where network effects or heavy switching costs exist. In those markets, refusing capital while a competitor takes it is a decision to lose. In most markets this dynamic does not apply, and speed bought with dilution buys nothing durable. Do you want to run this for a decade and then sell it? Venture capital has an implicit ending. The fund needs liquidity. If you want to own a profitable business indefinitely, you want a fundamentally different structure and should say so before, not after. Is capital genuinely your constraint? Founders often raise to solve problems money does not solve. If you have not found product market fit, capital lets you be wrong more expensively and for longer. If distribution is unproven, funding scales an unproven motion. The honest tradeoff Venture backed