标签：#us

Spotify is launching "Reserved," a new system that will hold two concert tickets for an artist's superfans before they're on sale to the public.

GitHub热门项目 | A graphical server OS optimized for self-hosting | Stars: 1,916 | 26 stars today | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | Rust for Windows | Stars: 12,425 | 2 stars today | 语言: Rust

The company's latest recall of 3,871 vehicles follows incidents of its autonomous cars prioritizing other hazards or failing to recognize closed construction zones altogether.

The company has identified at least 13 instances where its robotaxis drove into highway sections closed for construction.

I joined DEV at the start of January, but it's only really been in the past week or so that things clicked into place — and looking back, it's been a lot more eventful than I expected for "week one." What I Set Out to Do My original plan was simple: write a structured series covering iOS development with Swift and SwiftUI, one topic at a time, with anime examples thrown in to keep things fun. Strings, arrays, loops, functions — the building blocks. What I didn't plan for was everything else that happened alongside it. The June Solstice Game Jam Happened I saw the announcement for DEV's June Solstice Game Jam and, on a whim, decided to build something for it. A few hours later I had a fully working SwiftUI trivia game — Pride Trivia & Alan Turing Edition — with ten questions covering LGBTQIA+ history and Alan Turing's legacy, a rainbow progress bar, and a results screen with score-based messages. I'd never built and shipped something end-to-end like that before, let alone submitted it to a community challenge. Going from "let's see if this works in the simulator" to "this is live on GitHub with a demo video and a published writeup" in one sitting was honestly a bit of a blur. Then I Detoured Into Google AI Studio A few days later, I worked through the DEV Education Track for Google AI Studio and built MascotCraft Studio — an app that generates coding mascots using Gemini and Imagen. One prompt later, I had a fully deployed web app and a mascot named Octo-Byte , a cheerful deep-sea developer with eight arms and a talent for multitasking. That post sparked one of my favorite discussions so far — a few comments turned into a genuinely interesting conversation about how AI is shifting the bottleneck from "can I build this" to "what should I build, and how do I know if it's good." Not at all what I expected from a post about a cartoon octopus. The Badges Somewhere in all of this, I picked up: A 1 Week Community Wellness Streak badge, just from commenting on other people's

A trader I was talking to recently said something that stuck with me: "I've blown accounts just from slow fills or missed order cancellations." He was talking about CEX perpetuals. But the problem is identical on Polymarket's CLOB - just measured in seconds instead of milliseconds. My TypeScript bot was averaging 340ms from signal detection to order placement on Polymarket's Central Limit Order Book. On a 5-minute market with a ~2.7-second mispricing window, that's 12% of the entire opportunity window consumed before a single byte hits Polymarket's servers. I was consistently entering at 74¢ when I'd detected the signal at 70¢. The market had already repriced against me. So I rewrote it in Rust. This article documents exactly what I found, what changed, and - critically - what didn't. Background: What My Bot Was Doing If you've read my earlier posts in this series ( architecture , Kelly Criterion sizing , last-60-seconds capture ), you know the context. But the short version: The bot targets Polymarket's 5-minute and 15-minute crypto up/down binary markets (BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL, DOGE, BNB). The strategy is simple: find markets that are briefly mispriced relative to real-time spot momentum, enter at a discount to fair value, hold to resolution. A 5-minute "XRP Up" market priced at 70¢ when spot momentum suggests 82% probability = +12¢ edge per dollar wagered. Do that 50 times a day with disciplined sizing and the math works - if you can actually get filled at the price you detected. The problem: by the time my TypeScript code detected the signal, formatted the order, opened an HTTP connection to Polymarket's CLOB API, waited for TLS handshake, serialized the payload, and received confirmation, the market had often moved to 74-76¢. I was paying for an edge I wasn't capturing. Profiling the TypeScript Bot: Where Was the 340ms Going? Before rewriting anything, I instrumented every stage of the order path. Here's what I found across 500 sampled trades: Stage Average time %

There is a dangerous trap in the local AI world: picking the smallest quantization that fits into your VRAM just because it "runs." We see developers doing this all the time, completely unaware that they’ve crippled their agent's ability to reason. It’s easy to look at a leaderboard, see a model rank high, and assume it’s good to go. But leaderboard scores are a poor proxy for real-world agent behavior. A model might pass a static benchmark at a lower quantization, but when you put it in an agentic loop, its tool-calling accuracy can fall off a cliff. We built the "Quant Audit" feature in QuantaMind because we were tired of this silent failure. It systematically measures the performance drop-off as you move through different compression levels. The goal shouldn’t be to find the smallest quant that loads; it should be to identify the largest quant that actually retains the reasoning integrity your app requires. Stop guessing, start measuring, and stop letting leaderboard hype dictate your architecture.

Epic Games just dropped something that could reshape how game studios handle code and assets. They've open-sourced Lore — a centralized version control system built from the ground up to solve one painful problem: managing enormous binary files alongside source code. This isn't another Git wrapper. It's a completely new VCS, written in Rust, MIT-licensed, and battle-tested behind Fortnite's UEFN (Unreal Editor for Fortnite) toolkit. Why Does the World Need Another VCS? Git is brilliant for text-based code. But game development isn't just text. It's 4K textures, uncompressed audio, rigged 3D models, animation sequences, and massive world maps. These files can be hundreds of megabytes each. Git wasn't designed for this. Git LFS (Large File Storage) helps, but it's a patch on top of a fundamentally text-oriented system. Perforce Helix Core has been the industry standard for game studios for decades — but it's proprietary, expensive, and closed-source. Epic Games looked at this landscape and said: we can do better. What Is Lore? Lore is a centralized, content-addressed version control system optimized for: Large binary assets — textures, meshes, audio, video Massive teams — hundreds of developers working simultaneously Hybrid projects — code + binaries in the same repository Sparse checkouts — developers only download what they need Think of it as Perforce's philosophy (centralized, binary-friendly) combined with Git's content-addressed storage model, wrapped in Rust's performance guarantees. How It Works Under the Hood Lore's architecture is built around a few key technical decisions: Content-Addressed Storage Every piece of data is stored and referenced by its content hash. This means: Automatic deduplication — identical content is stored once Integrity verification — any tampering changes the hash Efficient caching — content can be cached anywhere in the pipeline Merkle Trees & Immutable Revision Chain Revision hashes are cryptographically derived from parent hashes

Days before Anthropic took its most advanced AI models offline, the White House ordered the company to revoke SK Telecom’s access to Claude Mythos over claims of alleged ties to China.

The former Sequoia Capital leader is filling an "existing vacancy" on SpaceX's board, days after the company went public in the largest IPO ever.

In Shenzhen, workers at IO-AI Tech control humanoid robots using a VR rig reminiscent of Ready Player One.

How GPU scheduling complexity and MLOps integration are forcing platform teams to rearchitect Kubernetes clusters before operational debt becomes insurmountable. As AI workloads consume roughly 40% of enterprise Kubernetes clusters by 2026, the platform's default scheduler is proving fundamentally mismatched with the topology-aware, gang-scheduled demands of GPU-intensive training and inference. Platform engineering teams that invest now in purpose-built GPU scheduling layers, multi-tenant partitioning, and FinOps-driven autoscaling will separate themselves from organizations drowning in 30-45% GPU utilization rates and mounting infrastructure costs. Why the Default Kubernetes Scheduler Fails GPU Workloads Kubernetes was designed for stateless, CPU-bound services, and its pod-by-pod bin-packing scheduler has no native awareness of GPU topology, NUMA boundaries, or NVLink interconnect bandwidth. This becomes a critical failure point with NVIDIA H100 SXM5 nodes, where achieving full-bandwidth tensor parallelism requires all 8 GPUs on a node to be scheduled as a single atomic unit. The default scheduler cannot guarantee this co-placement, meaning distributed PyTorch FSDP or MPI training jobs frequently land on suboptimal node configurations, wasting expensive NVLink bandwidth and forcing teams to over-provision GPU capacity. Idle GPU memory stranded across partially-utilized nodes is the primary driver behind the 30-45% utilization rates reported in 2025 surveys by Gradient Dissent and Weights and Biases, representing millions of dollars in annual wasted spend for mid-to-large enterprises running mixed AI workloads. Building the GPU Scheduling Stack: Volcano, KAI Scheduler, and MIG Platform teams are converging on a layered scheduling architecture that replaces or augments the default Kubernetes scheduler with GPU-aware primitives. Volcano has become the dominant choice for distributed training workloads, using its PodGroup abstraction to enforce gang scheduling across

The build-vs-buy question gets answered wrong in both directions. Scrappy teams build things they should have bought, wasting six months reinventing Stripe. Enterprise teams buy things they should have built, ending up with a duct-taped stack of ten SaaS products that cost more than a full-stack engineer. The real answer depends on five questions most decision frameworks don't ask. This guide is a practical walkthrough for anyone trying to figure out the right call for their own business. The Myth That Distorts Every Build-vs-Buy Conversation "Buying is cheaper." This is the default assumption, and it's wrong often enough to be dangerous. Buying looks cheaper because the cost is monthly instead of upfront -- a psychological trick, not an economic one. Run the numbers on any SaaS tool over 5 years and you'll usually find the cost lands within 2x of building custom. Sometimes below. The real cost difference is not price; it's time, flexibility, and ownership. When you buy: You spend less today, more in year 3 You get speed now, rigidity later You trade money for control You own none of the code When you build: You spend more today, less per year You trade speed now for flexibility later You trade money for control You own the code and can change anything Both are rational trades. The question is which one matches the stage and strategy of your business. When Buying Wins Start with the easy case. Buy off-the-shelf when: 1. The problem is generic and solved. Email hosting, payment processing, accounting, HR payroll, customer support tickets, video conferencing, file storage. These are solved problems. Building your own is nearly always the wrong call. 2. The space has mature competitive options. If there are 5 reputable companies competing on price and features, you benefit from that competition. Building custom takes you out of it. 3. Your process is standard. If you do exactly what every other company in your vertical does, a tool built for every company in your verti

“People just really want to take back control of their time, their lives, their attention... They’re down for whatever helps them do that.”

Critical Energy is turning rocket engines into geothermal power plants, and it wants to build 300 GW per year by 2045.

GitHub热门项目 | Vite+ is the unified toolchain and entry point for web development. It manages your runtime, package manager, and frontend toolchain in one place. | Stars: 5,011 | 19 stars today | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | A terminal workspace with batteries included | Stars: 33,722 | 55 stars today | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | Tinymist [ˈtaɪni mɪst] is an integrated language service for Typst [taɪpst]. | Stars: 3,308 | 8 stars today | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | zenoh unifies data in motion, data in-use, data at rest and computations. It carefully blends traditional pub/sub with geo-distributed storages, queries and computations, while retaining a level of time and space efficiency that is well beyond any of the mainstream stacks. | Stars: 2,890 | 6 stars today | 语言: Rust