Capture the new words you're reading & remember them later Discussion | Link

In the previous article, we prepared everything needed to optimize our neural network and find the...

GitHub热门项目 | The GEP-powered self-evolving engine for AI agents. Auditable evolution with Genes, Capsules, and Events. | evomap.ai | Stars: 7,871 | 140 stars today | 语言: JavaScript

Talk about AI causing layoffs started back in 2024. At that time, many companies were under pressure...

Channel Frekuensi (MHz) 1 2412 2 2417 3 2422 4 2427 5 2432 6 2437 7 2442 8 2447 9 2452 10 2457 11 2462 12 2467 13 2472 14 2484 Catatan: Channel yang tidak tumpang tindih adalah channel 1, 6, dan 11. Channel 12 dan 13 legal di Indonesia dan Eropa, tetapi dilarang di Amerika Serikat. Channel 14 hanya digunakan di Jepang, tepatnya pada standar 802.11b .

Fallback rules are where an AI API gateway becomes operationally valuable. The goal is not to blindly retry every failed LLM call. The goal is to choose the right backup model, provider, or budget path based on the workflow, customer tier, latency target, and risk of a lower-quality answer. A practical fallback policy should define: which failures are retryable; which workflows may downgrade models; which customers or API keys are allowed to use premium fallback routes; how budget caps change routing behavior; what metadata gets logged so the team can debug cost and quality later. 1. Classify traffic before routing Do not write one global fallback rule for every request. Start by classifying traffic: Critical user-facing : support chat, checkout assistance, customer-facing agent answers. Non-critical user-facing : summaries, title generation, enrichment, recommendations. Internal automation : triage, labeling, data cleanup, back-office agents. Batch jobs : long-running summarization, extraction, report generation. Experiments : tests, staging, evaluation, prompt tuning. Each class should have a different fallback budget and quality floor. 2. Decide what counts as a retryable failure Good retry candidates: upstream timeout; 429 rate limit; temporary 5xx provider error; network interruption; overloaded model endpoint; streaming connection drop before useful output. Poor retry candidates: invalid API key; malformed request payload; unsupported tool-call schema; content policy rejection; user quota exhausted; deterministic validation failure. Retrying non-retryable failures usually burns tokens and hides product bugs. 3. Example fallback policy matrix Traffic class Primary route First fallback Second fallback Hard stop Critical user-facing frontier model same-class model on second provider cheaper model with explicit uncertainty after 2 provider failures Non-critical user-facing balanced model cheaper model cached/default response after budget cap Internal automation lo

All tests run on an 8-year-old MacBook Air. All results from shipping 7 Mac apps as a solo developer. No sponsored opinion. HiyokoKit's MTP file manager includes QuickLook preview. Press Space, see the file. Native macOS behavior in a Tauri app. Here's how it works — and why it's worth doing. What QuickLook Is QuickLook is macOS's built-in file preview system. Press Space on any file in Finder — that's QuickLook. It handles images, PDFs, videos, and documents without opening separate apps. For a file manager, QuickLook preview is table stakes on macOS. Users expect it. If it's missing, the app feels unfinished. Triggering QuickLook from Rust The qlmanage command-line tool can trigger QuickLook from any process: use std :: process :: Command ; #[tauri::command] async fn preview_file ( file_path : String ) -> Result < (), AppError > { Command :: new ( "qlmanage" ) .args ([ "-p" , & file_path ]) .spawn () .map_err (| e | AppError :: Preview ( e .to_string ())) ? ; Ok (()) } qlmanage -p opens a native QuickLook preview window for the specified path. That's it on the Rust side for local files. For MTP Files: Download First, Preview, Cleanup Files on an Android device don't have a local path — they live on the device over MTP. The flow is: download to a temp file → preview → clean up. #[tauri::command] async fn preview_mtp_file ( device_path : String , filename : String , ) -> Result < (), AppError > { // Download to temp let temp_path = std :: env :: temp_dir () .join ( & filename ); download_from_device ( & device_path , & temp_path ) .await ? ; // Open QuickLook Command :: new ( "qlmanage" ) .args ([ "-p" , temp_path .to_str () .unwrap ()]) .spawn () ? ; // Schedule cleanup after delay let temp_clone = temp_path .clone (); tokio :: spawn ( async move { tokio :: time :: sleep ( Duration :: from_secs ( 30 )) .await ; std :: fs :: remove_file ( temp_clone ) .ok (); }); Ok (()) } 30 seconds gives the user time to view before cleanup. For large files (RAW photos, videos), y

The Term Everyone Uses and Nobody Defines Your CTO came back from a conference and said the team needs to "go agentic." A vendor pitched you an "agentic data platform" last week. LinkedIn is full of posts about agentic workflows transforming everything from customer support to supply chain management. And yet, when you ask three people what "agentic" actually means for your data operations, you get four answers. This is not a vocabulary problem. It is a strategy problem. Organizations are making six-figure decisions about agentic AI without a shared definition of what they are buying, building, or hiring for. That gap between the buzzword and the architecture is where most projects fail -- not because the technology does not work, but because nobody agreed on what it was supposed to do. This guide is a practitioner's attempt to close that gap. No vendor pitch, no hand-waving. Just a clear definition, a real example, and a framework for deciding whether agentic workflow consulting is something your team actually needs. What "Agentic" Actually Means (In Plain Language) Traditional data pipelines are deterministic. You define steps, connect them in order, and run them. Step A feeds step B, which feeds step C. If the input changes shape, the pipeline breaks and a human fixes it. The pipeline does not adapt, reason, or make decisions -- it executes. Robotic process automation (RPA) is slightly smarter but still scripted. It records human actions and replays them. Click here, type there, move this file. When the UI changes or an edge case appears, the bot breaks the same way a pipeline breaks: it stops and waits for a human. Agentic workflows are fundamentally different. An agentic system has components that can reason about their task, make decisions based on context, and take actions without a pre-scripted path for every scenario. Instead of "if X then Y," an agentic node can evaluate ambiguous input, choose between approaches, validate its own output, and route work to

Bitcoin can look simple from the outside: paste an address, choose an amount, send. Under that simple interface are several concepts that are useful for developers and technical beginners to understand. This post is not trading advice and does not discuss price. It is a practical mental model for what is happening when someone sends Bitcoin. 1. A wallet does not "hold coins" the way an app balance does Many beginners imagine a wallet as a container full of coins. That is close enough for casual conversation, but it can be misleading. A Bitcoin wallet manages keys and helps create transactions. The Bitcoin network tracks spendable outputs on the ledger. When you send BTC, the wallet constructs a transaction that spends previous outputs and creates new outputs. You do not need to master every detail on day one, but the high-level idea matters: control of keys controls the ability to spend. 2. An address is a destination, not an identity A Bitcoin address is where funds can be sent. It is not a username and it is not automatically tied to a person in the way a social profile is. Before sending, beginners should check the address carefully. A small copy-paste mistake can be permanent. Malware can also replace clipboard contents, so visually checking the beginning and ending characters is a useful habit. For larger transfers, a tiny test transaction can reduce risk. 3. Fees are about block space Bitcoin transactions compete for limited block space. A fee is not a tip to a company. It is part of the transaction economics that helps miners decide which transactions to include. When the network is busy, low-fee transactions may wait longer. When the network is quieter, confirmations may happen faster. The beginner lesson is simple: do not assume "sent" means "fully settled." Check confirmations and understand that fee choice can affect waiting time. 4. The mempool is a waiting area Before a transaction is confirmed in a block, it may sit in the mempool, which is a pool of u

Most of us use AI coding tools in a very normal way. We paste an error, ask for a fix, paste a file, ask again, run a command, paste the output, and keep going. After some time, we get a message saying something like you are out of tokens or you have reached your message limit . Most of the time, the reason is tokens. What is a token? A token is a small piece of text the model reads or writes. It can be a word, part of a word, a symbol, or spacing depending on the language and context. The model does not see text exactly like we do. It breaks everything into tokens first. So when you send a message, you are sending input tokens. When the model replies, it creates output tokens. If your coding agent reads files, terminal logs, docs, diffs, and old chat history, that can also become input tokens. What is a context window? The context window is the amount of text the model can keep in view at one time. It includes your message, the previous conversation, files, tool output, system instructions, project rules, and the model's own reply. Some models can hold a lot now. 200K tokens is already common in many coding workflows. Some newer models can go near 1M tokens. That sounds huge, and it is huge. But it does not mean you should always use it. Roughly speaking, 1M tokens can be hundreds of pages of text. It can be a big part of a codebase, many docs, or long chat history. But the model still has to read through that text. More context can mean more cost, more waiting, and more chances for the important thing to get buried. A rough mental model: Context size What it might hold 32K tokens A few files, a long bug report, or a small feature discussion 128K tokens Many files, long logs, or a decent chunk of project docs 200K tokens A large debugging session with files, logs, and history 1M tokens Hundreds of pages, big docs, or a large slice of a codebase This is not exact. Different languages, code, spacing, and tokenizers change the count. But it gives you the idea. Large c

APScheduler's Advisory Lock Failure: My Solo VM's Scheduler Died Permanently It started with a user report: "Content engine auto-publishing should put 3 posts on dev.to, but only 2 appeared, and then nothing worked." This is the kind of subtle bug that can fester, but the reality was far more systemic. My entire APScheduler setup had died. Not just for dev.to, but for *all* my scheduled tasks: content engine sweeps, daily top 3 analysis, profile analysis, model health checks, weekly reports – everything. The cron logs showed nothing for three days straight. This wasn't just a hiccup; it was a full-blown scheduler apocalypse on my single small VM. The immediate symptom was a lack of new posts on dev.to, but the root cause was a complete, permanent scheduler failure. The Wrong Turn: Relying on PostgreSQL Advisory Locks for Leader Election My approach to ensuring only one instance of my worker process ran scheduled jobs involved using PostgreSQL's pg_try_advisory_lock . The idea was that each worker would try to acquire this advisory lock. The one that succeeded would be the leader, responsible for running the jobs. Other workers would see the lock is held and stand down. However, in my specific environment – direct PostgreSQL connection (localhost:5432) without a connection pooler like pgbouncer, using asyncpg for dedicated connections – this mechanism proved fatally flawed. The lock was acquired, but immediately released. The worker thought it held the lock ( active=True ), but a check of pg_locks showed zero holders. This meant the singleton pattern was broken. Worse, the self-healing mechanism relied on the same flawed lock acquisition, meaning it couldn't recover. The situation was so unstable that I even observed a period where both my blue and green services (running on ports 8000 and 8001 respectively) thought they were the leader, resulting in a double execution of jobs. This was a clear sign the leader election was fundamentally broken. The Root Cause: Sessio

I keep seeing shit all over about companies producing 95% of their code using AI. I see people saying they now write 100k lines of code a day. I am seeing this everywhere and as a CTO and solo eng, this has given me major fomo. For the past few months I have been working on everything I can to get to this level. I tried Ralph loop, goals, compound engineering, and my own mixture of things. No matter what I just keep finding that slop is coming out the other end and my time to review and fix (by prompting or by manually fixing) is 1. feeling like a pretty huge time sink and 2. sucks way worse than just using my brain to write to code. it is much less rewarding/ fun fixing retarded code than it is writing something elegant myself. I know AI is a huge productivity booster when I can use it for internal tools, scripts, prototypes, and boiler plate or highly defined work. other than that, it seems like it is kind of a time sink, especially for production and legacy apps. You guys experiencing this too? seriously, is the shit about crazy good ai output out there real and if so, how do I attain it? my tech advisor thinks it’s total BS and even said Google engineering is pulling back their AI use in coding some submitted by /u/l300TS [link] [留言]

Qisquiz: A Qiskit v2.X Certification Prep App I built Qisquiz , a web app for learning Qiskit v2.X and preparing for the IBM Certified Quantum Computation using Qiskit v2.X Developer - Associate certification exam. You can try the app here: https://qisquiz.vercel.app/ The GitHub repository is here: https://github.com/dorakingx/qisquiz The concept of Qisquiz is simple: Master Qiskit, one quiz at a time. In other words, Qisquiz is a quiz-based certification prep app that helps learners study Qiskit one question at a time. The target exam is: Exam C1000-179: Fundamentals of Quantum Computing Using Qiskit v2.X Developer Why I Built Qisquiz Qiskit is one of the most important development tools for learning and building quantum computing applications. It is useful for creating quantum circuits, running simulations, using IBM Quantum hardware, and experimenting with quantum algorithms. However, Qiskit v2.X includes several APIs and concepts that learners need to understand carefully. For example, certification prep requires knowledge of topics such as: Qiskit Runtime SamplerV2 EstimatorV2 PUBs, or Primitive Unified Blocs BackendV2 backend.target Transpilation ISA circuits Dynamic circuits OpenQASM 3 Result object handling Little-endian and big-endian interpretation These topics can be learned by reading documentation, but I felt that active practice through quizzes is especially useful for exam preparation. That is why I built Qisquiz , a quiz-based learning app focused on Qiskit v2.X. What Is Qisquiz? Qisquiz is an independent quiz-based learning app for Qiskit v2.X. The current version is organized around the 8 sections of the IBM Qiskit v2.X Developer certification exam. The current question bank includes: 120 original questions 44 code-based questions 40 hard questions 8 sections 15 questions per section Qisquiz is not an official IBM or Qiskit product. It is an independent learning tool that I built to help myself and other learners prepare more effectively. Covered E