Give your Sales and CS teams engineering superpowers Discussion | Link

Hey everyone, here is a small project I've built over the previous weekend: https://starguessr.vincentwill.com/ I'd love to know what you think :) submitted by /u/Vincenius_ [link] [留言]

I didn't submit any but did place bids on some papers. I got assigned four papers. I have a bit of travel coming up and I don't think I will be able to do justice to as many the papers, especially in the rebuttal period. Is this the standard reviewing load? In other communities I submit to, generally the AC themselves are assigned four papers. In addition to reaching out to program chairs, is there any other way? submitted by /u/movieingitmyway [link] [留言]

Abstract. Standard dense self-attention scales quadratically in sequence length, creating an intractable memory and compute bottleneck for long-context Transformers. We introduce Dynamic Ultrametric Attention, a framework in which a Transformer autonomously learns per-head block-sparse routing topologies during training via Gumbel-Sigmoid depth gates, then offloads those learned sparsity patterns directly to a custom Triton block-sparse kernel at inference time. The routing topology is derived from an ultrametric (tree-structured) distance matrix that encodes hierarchical relationships between token positions. Across nine experiments spanning Dyck-k bracket languages, the Long Range Arena ListOps benchmark, autoregressive serving, and natural language modeling, we demonstrate that: (1) the dynamic gates organically discover layer-wise specialization—dedicating early layers to hierarchical parsing and later layers to dense aggregation—without any architectural constraint; (2) the learned sparsity maps transfer losslessly to a block-sparse Triton kernel that skips entire SRAM loads for non-attending blocks; (3) the resulting system achieves an 11.59× wall-clock inference speedup over PyTorch dense attention at 2048 tokens, scaling to 28× at 8192 tokens with 98.4% memory reduction; (4) a sparse PagedAttention decoding kernel achieves 8× effective memory bandwidth over dense decoding by conditionally skipping KV-cache block loads; and (5) when augmented with a local sliding window, the architecture maintains >88% sparsity across all layers on real natural language (Shakespeare) while reducing cross-entropy loss from 10.9 to 1.55. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an LLM learning its own hardware-optimal sparsity pattern and bridging it to a physically accelerated kernel without post-hoc pruning or distillation. https://github.com/sneed-and-feed/adelic-spectral-zeta/blob/main/papers/learning_to_skip_blocks.md submitted by /u/LooseSwing88 [link] [留言]

Check it out here: broop.id submitted by /u/toplez [link] [留言]

I benchmarked it against PyTorch with a Wikipedia dataset. I heavily used Gemini Flash 3.5 to build out my vision https://huggingface.co/etoxin/neuronguard-wikipedia-classifier submitted by /u/Logical_Prompt_3543 [link] [留言]

A lot of people talk about the Epstein files. Almost nobody actually reads them. So I made a searchable version where you can just ask questions naturally instead of digging through thousands of pages manually. You can explore names, timelines, mentions, connections, locations, etc. way faster now. Repo: https://github.com/AbhisumatK/Epstein\_Files\_RAG submitted by /u/Prestigious_Bear5424 [link] [留言]

This is a submission for the Hermes Agent Challenge . I have been playing with different AI agents for a while now. Most of them feel like clever chatbots that forget everything the moment the conversation ends. Then I tried Hermes Agent from Nous Research a few weeks back. It actually feels different. It grows with you. That stuck with me. What Hermes Agent is Hermes is an open-source autonomous agent that runs on your own server or VPS. It is not locked to one IDE or one API. You install it once, pick any model you like, and it starts building its own memory and skills over time. The big idea is a built-in learning loop. When it solves something useful, it can create a reusable skill in Markdown, improve it later, and pull it back when needed. It also keeps persistent memory across sessions so it slowly builds a picture of how you work and what your projects look like. I set it up on a cheap VPS with a simple curl command. The installer is straightforward. After that I ran hermes setup and connected it to a model I already had access to. Within minutes I could chat with it from Telegram while it worked in the background on the server. That alone felt freeing. My experience so far I started simple. I asked it to monitor a few GitHub repos and send me a daily summary. It remembered the context from previous days without me repeating instructions. Over a week it created a couple of small skills on its own for formatting those reports nicely. I also used it for research tasks. It can search the web, browse pages, and chain steps together. What surprised me was how it handled follow-ups. Instead of starting fresh each time, it referred back to earlier parts of our conversation. That made longer projects feel more natural. The multi-platform support is practical. I switch between CLI on my laptop and Telegram on my phone. The agent just continues wherever I left it. Why it matters Most agent frameworks still feel stateless. You get good results in the moment but lose th

AI coding tools are no longer just autocomplete engines. For the last few years, developers used AI mainly to write faster: generate a function, explain an error, complete boilerplate, or suggest a code snippet. That was useful, but the human developer still controlled almost every step. Now the shift is toward agentic software development. Tools like OpenAI Codex and Google Antigravity are not only helping developers write code. They are starting to inspect repositories, understand tasks, edit files, run commands, verify outputs, and return work for human review. But Codex and Antigravity are not the same kind of product. They represent two different architectures for the future of software development. Codex: Delegated Engineering Agent OpenAI Codex is best understood as a delegated software engineering agent. The developer gives it a scoped task: fix a bug, review a pull request, write tests, refactor a module, or implement a defined feature. Codex then works through the codebase, makes changes, runs checks where possible, and returns a result that the developer can review. Its natural workflow is close to how software teams already work: Task → Repository Context → Code Changes → Tests/Checks → Pull Request or Reviewable Output This makes Codex useful for structured engineering work. It fits naturally into GitHub-style workflows, pull requests, code reviews, tests, and CI/CD practices. In simple terms, Codex feels like assigning work to an AI engineer. Antigravity: Agent-Orchestration Environment Google Antigravity takes a different approach. It is better understood as an agent-first development environment. Instead of focusing only on one delegated task, Antigravity is designed around supervising agents inside the development workspace. Agents can operate across the editor, terminal, browser, and artifacts. They can help plan, build, verify, and explain the work. Its workflow looks more like this: Goal → Agent Orchestration → Workspace Execution → Browser Verif

This is a submission for the GitHub Finish-Up-A-Thon Challenge What I Built SecAPI is a local-first, zero-trust CLI utility and key manager designed to make code security the easiest developer path. Exposing secrets (like Stripe, OpenAI, or AWS keys) in repository files is one of the most common causes of credential leaks. Often, developers resort to plaintext .env files that can be accidentally staged and pushed, or struggle with complex vault set-ups. SecAPI solves this with a seamless three-step command line workflow: Scans codebases for exposed API keys using fast regex rules or advanced AI analysis. Vaults secrets locally using strong AES-256 encryption derived via PBKDF2-HMAC (completely offline). Replaces raw hardcoded strings in code with secure, runtime references ( load_key("key_name") )—preserving variable names, indentation, and comments. It means we can keep our code secure, separate environments easily, and prevent pushes with unencrypted credentials—all without relying on cloud-based vault hosts. Demo Interactive Web Showcase : secapi.netlify.app GitHub Repository : github.com/BinayakJha/SecAPI The Scrolling CLI Showcase in Action Check out the interactive scrollytelling page on secapi.netlify.app to see the simulator type out and execute the CLI commands (scanning, setting up vaults, applying smart code rewrites, checking the status board, and running the git pre-commit hook) in real-time as you scroll! The Comeback Story Where It Started SecAPI was an abandoned CLI prototype. It was un-installable due to file packaging typos, suffered from weak vault security (a custom padding scheme instead of a standard key derivation function), had no recovery options if the master password was lost, and used a basic console print command to list keys. Furthermore, the AI scanner relied on outdated OpenAI package versions, creating environment conflicts. What I Changed, Fixed, and Added I gave the project a complete, ground-up overhaul to turn it into a premium,

All tests run on an 8-year-old MacBook Air. All results from shipping 7 Mac apps as a solo developer. No sponsored opinion. The most common Tauri v2 frustration: you write a command, invoke it from the frontend, and nothing happens. No error. No crash. Just silence. It's almost always permissions. How Tauri v2 permissions work Tauri v2 introduced a capability system. Every plugin action — reading files, executing shell commands, sending notifications — requires an explicit permission declaration in your config. Without the permission, the plugin call fails silently on the frontend. The Rust code never runs. // src-tauri/capabilities/main.json { "identifier" : "main-capability" , "description" : "Permissions for main window" , "windows" : [ "main" ], "permissions" : [ "core:default" , "fs:read-all" , "fs:write-all" , "shell:allow-execute" , "opener:allow-open" , "global-shortcut:allow-register" , "global-shortcut:allow-unregister" ] } Note: As of Tauri v2.1, shell:allow-open is deprecated. Use tauri-plugin-opener and opener:allow-open instead. The debugging flow When a command does nothing: Open DevTools ( Cmd+Option+I in dev mode) — check the console for a rejected Promise or permission error Check your terminal output — the Rust side logs errors directly in the tauri dev terminal; look for lines like [tauri] permission denied or not allowed Enable verbose logging — set RUST_LOG=tauri=debug before running tauri dev for more detailed backend output Check your capabilities file — missing or misspelled permission identifiers are the #1 cause Permission errors in the console typically look like a rejected Promise with a message such as plugin:shell|execute not allowed . The capabilities file is always the first thing to check. Common permissions you'll need "permissions" : [ "core:default" , "fs:read-all" , // read any file "fs:write-all" , // write any file { "identifier" : "shell:allow-execute" , "allow" : [{ "name" : "my-cmd" , "cmd" : "adb" , "args" : true }] }, "op

Thinking in terms of existence instead of lists SQL Pattern Series #1 of 21 A collection of practical SQL patterns that help developers recognize common solutions to recurring database problems. What You'll Learn In this article you'll learn: When EXISTS and IN solve the same problem The difference between set membership and existence Why the underlying mental model matters When I typically reach for EXISTS Most SQL developers write a query like this at some point: SELECT c . CustomerID , c . CustomerName FROM Customers c WHERE c . CustomerID IN ( SELECT o . CustomerID FROM Orders o ); And it works. But sometimes it isn't the best way to think about the problem. The Question Behind the Query Many SQL problems can be framed in two different ways. Set Membership Is this value in a set? WHERE CustomerID IN (...) Existence Does at least one matching row exist? WHERE EXISTS (...) Both approaches often return the same result. But they represent different mental models. The Presence Pattern The Presence Pattern is useful when you do not actually care about the values being returned from a related table. You only care whether a matching row exists. For example: Customers who have placed an order Users who have logged in Employees assigned to a project Products that have sales In these cases, the question is often: Does a related row exist? rather than: What values are contained in this list? Example Using EXISTS SELECT c . CustomerID , c . CustomerName FROM Customers c WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM Orders o WHERE o . CustomerID = c . CustomerID ); The subquery is correlated to the outer query. Conceptually, SQL asks: For this customer, does at least one matching order exist? As soon as the answer becomes true, the condition is satisfied. Why This Pattern Matters Many SQL developers initially learn syntax. Over time, they discover that query writing is really about choosing the right mental model. The Presence Pattern encourages you to think in terms of: existence relationshi