This is a submission for the GitHub Finish-Up-A-Thon Challenge What I Built Last...

So this a2e.ai website allows you to generate any image and for free. You get a good amount of credits amidst signing up Referal link: https://video.a2e.ai/?coupon=LgQi submitted by /u/No_Restaurant_5461 [link] [留言]

Just starting a discussion on breakpoints. Not like this hasn't been beaten to death before :D (͡(¬‿¬)) Tailwind sm: 40rem - roughtly 640px xs: is commonly set to 30rem or 320px for the smallest iphone width folding phones might be a use case for even smaller viewports.. idk, i cnat afford one so mauybe that's not how they work? supposedly they can be 280px there's smart glasses. no idea. VR. no idea. windows on desktop, people like me get really annoyed when some content of a window goes off screen or it transforms into a mobile version of the site just because i shrunk the window when i wanted to keep using the desktop site. (oh you and your tiling window manager, lol) submitted by /u/xThomas [link] [留言]

Maybe I’m just getting older, but frontend tooling changes so fast now that sometimes it feels harder keeping up with the ecosystem than actually building products. Feels like every few months there’s a new framework, rendering strategy, state management pattern or deployment workflow people suddenly expect you to know. submitted by /u/Bladerunner_7_ [link] [留言]

Book your next getaway with Expedia and get up to 75% off your stay, with or without a promo code.

Save up to 87% with a Surfshark coupon code, 3 months of VPN free today, and more from WIRED.

Enjoy 20% off your first order with a Brooks coupon code, plus top discounts and deals on our favorite Brooks running shoes.

Enjoy top deals on cameras, computers, and tech essentials at B&H Photo.

Whether you’re looking for a Herman Miller promo code or discounts in their sale, here is how to save on the world's best ergonomic office furniture this month.

Score big savings on Altra Running shoes with up to 50% off sale styles, 20% off select models, 10% off your first order when you sign up, plus free standard delivery on every purchase.

I’m working on a school Design & Technology major project and need help finding a subreddit to choose the best tool. The project is a browser-based low-poly 3D educational prototype about Greek mythology. It has a small Mount Olympus hub which is basically a decorated hub area with the one portal to the one playable myth scene: Theseus and the Minotaur in Daedalus’ Labyrinth which is essentially like a maze where you can explore/follow the myth through some mediums like cutscenes and some small puzzles. My constraints are: needs to run in a browser should work on normal school laptops/devices low-poly/simple 3D style minimal coding experience must be realistic for a student prototype ideally easy to share with a link More context is that essentially I have my whole design planned out with multiple eventualities based on the constraints on the tool I end up using and so I essentially just need a medium to construct my project in which is why I have left it so late to ask for advice on what tool to use to construct this prototype. I am confident with my extensive designs and a decently functioning prototype of this one playable scene and hub area along with potential future designs that I will show the design process adequately for a band 6 hopefully. submitted by /u/Bigbrainmc [link] [留言]

I built a Linux CLI tool that encrypts and decrypts folders using AES-256-GCM. It also hides file and folder names and stores the mapping in an encrypted file. Repo: https://github.com/sahilPadmani/ACE-files-encryption

A while ago I tried to build a local coding assistant. I downloaded Qwen3, fired it up on my MacBook with 16GB of RAM, and within a day realized the output quality was nowhere close to Claude or GPT-5. The model could fit . It just couldn't compete . So I changed the question. If I can't make the model smarter on my hardware, can I make what I feed it smarter? Where the tokens actually go I started watching where my Claude / Cursor / Copilot sessions actually spent their tokens. The surprise: most of it wasn't reasoning. It was lookup . Every fresh chat about my company's database re-discovered the same things: What does status = 3 mean? (cancelled) How does orders join to users ? ( orders.user_id → users.id ) What's that cryptic JobStatus enum? (a dozen integer codes nobody remembers) The model figured it out, the session ended, and tomorrow it figured it out again . Same tokens, same latency, every single time. The expensive part of working with an AI wasn't the thinking — it was re-teaching it things it had already learned yesterday. There's a lot of attention right now on trimming AI output tokens (talk like a caveman, strip the pleasantries, etc.). But in my workflow the bigger leak was on the input side: paying full token cost every session to re-establish context that never changed. "Memory" isn't a feature, it's an architecture question AI clients are starting to bolt on "memory" features. But they're proprietary, opaque, and locked to one tool. Claude's memory doesn't help Cursor. Cursor's doesn't help Copilot. You can't inspect it, you can't share it with a teammate, and you can't diff it. What I actually wanted was an explicit, inspectable, shareable context layer that any AI client could read deterministically — same answer every time, same file my team could hand off. I picked the highest re-learn cost in my world to start with: SQL databases. Enter amnesic amnesic is an open-source MCP server that gives any AI client persistent semantic memory of your

Most trading ideas start as vague thoughts. "Buy when RSI is oversold and price bounces from support." It sounds reasonable. But the moment you try to test or automate it, the ambiguity becomes obvious. What exactly counts as oversold? How is support defined? What qualifies as a bounce? When do you exit? Without precise answers, the idea cannot be tested, measured, or executed consistently. This gap between intuition and execution is exactly what no-code strategy builders are designed to close. Why vague trading ideas fail Most traders think in concepts rather than rules. "Buy the dip." "Trade strong momentum." "Enter when the trend looks healthy." These ideas feel intuitive, but they are unusable in practice unless translated into explicit logic. Without clear definitions, you cannot backtest a strategy, cannot repeat decisions consistently, and cannot diagnose why results change over time. Ambiguity leads to second-guessing. Second-guessing leads to inconsistent execution. Inconsistent execution makes performance impossible to evaluate. What a no-code strategy builder actually does A no-code strategy builder is a visual system that forces clarity. Instead of writing code, you select indicators, define conditions, combine logic using AND/OR rules, specify entries and exits, and then test the strategy on historical data. Conceptually, it works like assembling building blocks. Each block represents a condition such as "RSI below 30" or "price above moving average." When combined, those blocks form a complete, testable trading system. The key benefit is precision. From idea to testable strategy The transformation follows a predictable workflow. You begin with a loose idea, such as buying when a stock is oversold and starting to recover. You then break that idea into components. What defines oversold? What signals recovery? How do you enter? How do you exit? How much do you risk? Once those questions are answered, the idea becomes a set of explicit rules. For example,

I opened v0, typed "a settings page with profile editing, notification preferences, and a connected accounts section," and watched it generate a fully functional three-tab settings interface in under 40 seconds. The component used shadcn/ui primitives, Tailwind utility classes, and TypeScript types — the exact stack I would have chosen if I had written it from scratch. I copied the code, pasted it into my Next.js project, changed two import paths, and it rendered correctly on the first try. This is the v0 value proposition distilled: generate UI components that look like a senior frontend developer wrote them, then paste them into your real project without rewriting half the output. After generating 15 components across two weeks of real product work, I can confirm that v0 delivers on this promise more reliably than any general-purpose AI coding tool I have tested. But its scope is narrower than the marketing suggests, and understanding where v0 stops being useful is as important as knowing where it excels. The shadcn/ui Advantage v0 is built on top of shadcn/ui, and this is the single most important fact about how it works. shadcn/ui is not a component library in the traditional sense — it is a collection of copy-pasteable React components built on Radix UI primitives with Tailwind styling. When v0 generates a component, it uses these primitives directly, which means the output is consistent, accessible, and composable. The practical benefit is that v0-generated components integrate with your existing project without introducing a new design system. If you already use shadcn/ui — and a large and growing percentage of Next.js projects do — the generated components reuse your existing Button, Card, Dialog, and Input primitives. v0 just assumes you have them installed and generates code that expects them. If you do not have shadcn/ui in your project, v0 prompts you to run the initialization command before generating anything, which takes about 30 seconds. This archite