With discourse about Christopher Nolan’s epic already raging, first viewer reactions will come from mainstream press, not content creators. Some critics are gloating over this break from the norm.

We’ve already rounded up the best Philips Hue deals of Prime Day, but if you’re looking for something a little more budget-friendly, Govee’s latest sale is worth checking out. The company has heavily discounted several of its color-changing smart lamps, including the Table Lamp 2 ($53.99, down from $79.99), Floor Lamp Basic ($59.99, regularly $99.99), the […]

https://archive.md/ArXuF https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/us-government-gives-a...

If you ever find yourself with time to kill and crave a fun challenge, you can write a program that prints out its own source code, called a quine ). Go on, give it a try, it's good fun! Once that's done, what's to stop you from modifying the source code instead of printing it verbatim, slowly shifting forms as you iterate on each successive output? Naturally, you'll want to make a game that's played in its own source code (click for an animation): #include<stdio.h> #define z else #define y return #define x int #define w if( #define v putchar( #define B v 10); #define A v 92); /* IOCCC29, w = up, e = down */ x a= 32 ; x b= 6 ; x c= -1 ; x d= 1 ; x e= 5 ; x f= 10 ; x g= 62 ; x h= 5 ; x i[6]={ 1,3,1,4,1,0} ; char*j[]={ "\ \ #include<stdio.h>'#define$z$else'#define$y$return'#define$x$int'#defin\ e$w$if('#define$v$putchar('#define$B$v$10);'#define$A$v$92);''/*$IOCCC\ 29,$w$=$up,$e$=$down$*/''x$a=","32",";x$b=","6",";x$c=","-1",";x$d=","\ 1",";x$e=","5",";x$f=","10",";x$g=","62",";x$h=","5",";x$i[6]={1,3,1,4\ ,1,0};char*j[]={","","};x$k=0;x$l=1;x$m(){l++;w$l==1)y!v$44);w$l==2)y!\ v$34) ;char$o=j[k][l-3];w!o){l=0;k++;y!v$34);}w$o==34){A$y$v $34);\ }w$o= =92){A$y$A}w$o!=32&&o!=1 0)y!v$o);y$m();}void$n(x$o, x$p){\ aspri ntf(j+o,\"%i\",p);}x$mai n(x$o,char**p){char*q;w$c<2 )a+=c\ ;b+=d ;x$r=b+2>f/2&&b<f/2+5;x$s=a+2==g&&b+2>h&&b<h+5;w$c<2){ w$a==\ e+2&& r||s){a-=c;b-=d;c=-c;}w$a<0||a>67){w$a<0){c=2;d=0;}a=3 4;b=6\ ;}w$b<0||b>13){b-=d;d=-d;}w$f/2>10)f-=2;w$h>10)h--;w$o>1){w*p[1]==119&\ &h>0)h--;w*p[1]==101&&h<10)h++;}s=f/2-b+1;w$s<0)f++;w$s>0)f--;}z{b++;w\ $d<0)d++;w$b>=13){w$o>1&&*p[1]==119)d=-4;b=13;}w$f/2<15-i[c-2])f+=2;z$\ e--;w$h<15-i[c-1])h++;z$g--;w$e+3<=0){c++;w$c<7){e=g;f=h*2;g=70;h=15-i\ [c-1];}z{e=5;g=62;c=1;d=1;}}w$a+2==e&&r||s){c=2;e=5;f=28;g=62;h=12;}}n\ \ (1,a);n(3,b);n(5,c);n(7,d);n(9,e);n(11,f);n(13,g);n(15,h);for(s=0;s<","29",";s++){w$s)v$32);q=j[s];r=1;for(char*t=q;*t;t++)w*t==","36",")v$32);z$w*t==","39",")B$z$w*t!=32&&*t!=10){r=0;v*t);w*t==123||*t==125||*t

This is sorely needed, it is helpful for Hawaii as well as for California (cabins on forest service land)

Half-million strong military will train on drones as “universal combat tool.”

We’ve covered so many deals during Prime Day that my head is spinning. But after four days of doing our damndest to try and help folks save money, the thing I’m most hyped for is a simple tool for fixing my most egregious mistakes. I bought a pair of Vampliers. If you’re unfamiliar, Vampliers are […]

Corgi became embroiled in controversy when Papermark accused it of stealing its software. Corgi says it did not, raising new questions about vibe coding.

The github repo under eigenpal is gone. The web site at docx-editor is 503. No idea what's going on.

Most guides to OTP testing in Playwright include a function that looks something like this: function extractOtp ( emailBody : string ): string { const patterns = [ / \b(\d{6})\b / , /code [ : \s] + (\d{4,8}) /i , /verification [ : \s] + (\d{4,8}) /i , /OTP [ : \s] + (\d{4,8}) /i , ]; for ( const pattern of patterns ) { const match = emailBody . match ( pattern ); if ( match ) return match [ 1 ]; } throw new Error ( ' OTP not found in email body ' ); } This function is fragile. It breaks when the email template changes. It returns false positives when the email body contains order IDs or timestamps. It requires you to maintain regex patterns for every email provider your app might use. There is a better way. The Problem with Regex OTP Extraction When your app sends a verification email, the OTP is buried somewhere in the HTML body. To extract it you need to: Fetch the raw email body Parse HTML or plain text Apply regex patterns that match your specific email format Handle edge cases — 4-digit vs 6-digit codes, codes in tables, codes in buttons Every time your email provider changes their template, your regex breaks. Every time you add a new auth provider, you write new patterns. It is maintenance overhead that compounds forever. The right place to extract the OTP is at the infrastructure layer — before the email even reaches your test suite. How ZeroDrop Extracts OTPs at the Edge ZeroDrop catches emails at Cloudflare's edge before storing them. When an email arrives, the worker runs OTP detection on the body and stores the result as a structured field alongside the raw email. By the time your test calls waitForLatest() , the OTP is already extracted and sitting in email.otp . No regex. No HTML parsing. No maintenance. const email = await mail . waitForLatest ( inbox ); email . otp // "847291" — already extracted Setup npm install zerodrop-client No API key. No signup. No environment variables. Basic OTP Test import { test , expect } from ' @playwright/test ' ; import