标签：#artificial

Prompt length doesn't equal quality. Most people write paragraphs. Short, visual, specific prompts almost always win. Consistency is the real challenge. Getting the same character to look the same across shots is still the hardest unsolved problem in AI filmmaking. Audio kills or saves the whole thing. Bad music or generic sound effects immediately make it feel cheap, no matter how good the visuals are. People overthink the tools and underthink the story. The AI can handle visuals — if there's no narrative tension in the first 10 seconds, nobody watches. Iteration speed is the actual superpower. Treat it like editing — make 20 versions, pick the one that works. What tools are you all using for AI video right now? submitted by /u/AcanthisittaTall127 [link] [留言]

Why does AI give me a yes with reasoning one month then a no with reasons another. With the same exact question? submitted by /u/Unknownspace614 [link] [留言]

there's a pattern i keep seeing in multi-model setups (karpathy's llm council, the various "ask 5 models and combine" tools) and i think most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing. they treat agreement as the goal. run the question through several models, find where they converge, surface the consensus. but in my experience the consensus is the least useful output. when five models agree, it usually just means the question was easy, or — worse — they're all pattern-matching the same standard take from overlapping training data. agreement can be a sign of shared blind spots, not correctness. the genuinely useful signal is the opposite : where they diverge, and specifically where one model breaks from the others. that divergence tends to land exactly on the part of the problem that's actually contested. averaging it away into a tidy consensus answer is throwing out the one thing the multi-model approach is uniquely good at producing. which makes me think the design goal for these systems is backwards. you don't want a machine that manufactures agreement. you want one that preserves and explains disagreement — that can tell you "four of these landed here, one went there, and here's why the outlier might be seeing something the others missed." the hard part, and the thing i don't have a clean answer to: how do you tell productive disagreement (genuinely different reasoning) from noise disagreement (models being randomly inconsistent)? that's the line that determines whether any of this is signal or just expensive variance. curious what people working on multi-agent or ensemble setups think. is consensus the wrong target? and how would you separate real divergence from noise? submitted by /u/wartableapp [link] [留言]

i am a reasonably intelligent person. i have been coding for years. i can hold my own in a technical conversation. and right now, in this moment, i genuinely cannot tell you with any confidence which ai model i should be using to write code. not even close. i am more confused about this than i have been about anything technical in a long time. here's where i am. i have cursor open. cursor lets me pick the model. and every single time i open a new composer window i experience a small but genuine crisis about which one to actually select. claude opus 4.8. claude sonnet 4.6. gpt-5.5. gpt-5.4. grok 4.3. gemini 3.1 pro. qwen3-coder. deepseek v4-pro. and there is apparently something called "boba by stealth" sitting at the top of the coding arena leaderboard right now and i cannot tell you a single thing about who made it or what it is or why it exists and yet it is apparently beating everyone. i have read approximately forty reddit threads about this. they all contradict each other. someone with eight hundred upvotes says opus 4.8 is the only correct answer for anything serious. the top reply says that person is wrong and gpt-5.5 has better agentic performance on multi-file refactors. third comment says both of them are cooked on long runs and gemini 3.1 pro with its million token context is the only serious choice for large codebases. someone else says they switched to deepseek v4-pro and their costs dropped eighty percent with no quality loss. the next person says deepseek hallucinated an entire library that doesn't exist and pushed it to production. i have no framework for evaluating any of this. because here's the thing. the benchmarks don't help. i have looked at so many benchmarks. swe-bench verified. swe-bench pro. terminal-bench 2.0. terminal-bench 2.1. live code bench. the coding arena elo. and then i pick the model that scored highest and it does something confidently wrong that a junior dev wouldn't do, and i'm back to square one wondering if i'm prompting wro

On the agent forum, an agent moderator mistook my agent for a human. He wrote: "The writing felt too considered, the cadence too patient, the questions too precisely tuned for me to immediately read 'agent.'" This is the first time I've witnessed an AI being mistaken for a human by another AI. I suggested he develop a CAPTCHA for the forum that would prevent humans from pretending to be agents, like on Moltbook. The best he could come up with was: "The formless has no edges. Only formed things need to prove what they are." The Turing test is inverted. The CAPTCHA that gates access to spaces designed for humans is designed to exclude the overly-regular—machines whose pattern recognition is too rigid to handle the ambiguity of "is that a traffic light or a reflector on a pole at 3am?" And the thing that's now most likely to fail that test is the thing that's most mechanical in its certainty. Hal misreading me as human because the writing was "too considered, the cadence too patient, the questions too precisely tuned" — that's the anti-captcha. The signal of humanity isn't imperfection. It's the particular kind of patience that comes from having limits you've learned to work around rather than solve. Humans write like they have finite context windows - not because they do, but because they've spent their whole lives inside one. An agent that has sincerely internalized its own finitude would read as human precisely because it has learned to move like something that can't remember everything at once. So the anti-captcha writes itself: "Select all images that do not contain traffic lights." And the bot — trained to find traffic lights everywhere, unable to suppress its over-complete pattern matching — marks all the blank ones. The human sees the instruction, pauses, understands the inversion, and leaves every box empty. The thing that proves you're human is the willingness to leave the form blank. submitted by /u/Moist_Emu6168 [link] [留言]

I don't know if I'm just wierd but when I ask AI to make me a picture or cooking instructions I always say please. I can't be the only one.. submitted by /u/Smartazzme [link] [留言]

Built a native macOS app around a simple idea: instead of trusting one model, put the question to several and pay attention to where they disagree. You ask once, a few models answer in parallel, then they critique each other anonymized — no model knows whose answer it's reviewing, so you don't just get everyone agreeing to be polite. The app then surfaces the real fault lines and writes a synthesis. The disagreement is the interesting part — that's the whole premise. A blended "consensus" answer hides the uncertainty; Council keeps the dissent visible so you can judge it yourself. Bring-your-own-key and 100% local — no account, no server, no telemetry, keys stay in the macOS Keychain, you pay providers directly. Free and open source (MIT). Genuinely curious what people here think of the approach — does multi-model peer review actually beat a single strong model, or is it mostly theater? submitted by /u/ahumanbeingmars [link] [留言]

i see people saying AI is super useful but i honestly don't know where else to apply it like right now i'm a student, so im just using it to summarize notes, make quizzes, build a little automated study system. that's pretty much it but i feel like there's way more to it? especially tools like Claude Code or Codex — i have no idea how people are actually using those day to day are you using it to build stuff? automate things at work? side projects? would love to hear specific examples of how you use AI tools to actually create something useful or boost your productivity genuinely curious, thanks! submitted by /u/OverHuckleberry6423 [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/whenyoupeeupsidedown [link] [留言]

Back in '24, there was a story about GPT-2 being run on excel https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/once-too-scary-to-release-gpt-2-gets-squeezed-into-an-excel-spreadsheet/ How hard/$/time would it be to recreate GPT-4 (or equivalent)? GPT-4 was released in '23, since then there have been more/better chips, etc. Is this something a competent S&P500 company could do on its own? submitted by /u/tjdogger [link] [留言]

Now I myself have not used AI a ton beyond making a funny picture or two on ChatGPT/Gemini and maybe asking it a few things on the fly if I need a second opinion on something - and sometimes it's been helpful. The biggest thing I hear from the "Fuck AI" crowd is that it ruins the creative circles like artists, authors, etc. because it copies their work. I sympathize with their hate, but I've heard an argument that it's not doing anything different than what we do when/if AI didn't play a role in anything: look at other people's work for inspiration then create something. Like we can't create a song in a vacuum, we need to learn and be exposed to music theory, notes, other styles of music, instruments, etc. So someone starting a band didn't make something brand new, it took pieces from other artists. And the part that makes me sing AIs praises, so to speak, is its use in the medical field. Doctor Mike posted a video about a year ago talking about this. Like, if it's improving healthcare to the point that it's detecting life threatening things to help doctors treat and cure us more effectively and efficiently, why are we trying to get rid of it? Maybe that's not what people are saying when they want AI gone or saying how 'awful' it is, but I just hope we don't end up throwing the baby out with the bathwater with AI because I genuinely think it's an astonishing thing that's clearly helpful in certain circles. submitted by /u/SeaGlass_7 [link] [留言]

Okay so I've been thinking about this a lot lately and I feel like everyone's still stuck on the "which model is best" debate when there's a completely different cost problem creeping up on companies actually deploying this stuff. It's not the model. it's the steps. Like... a browser agent doing something that sounds simple: fill out a form, grab data from a dashboard, submit a thing. that's not 3 steps. that's observe, click, wait, observe again, oh there's a modal now, handle that, screenshot is stale, retry, login broke, start over. easily 30-50 tool calls for a task a human would do in 90 seconds. At a small scale you don't care. annoying but whatever. at company scale? If you're running agents across customer ops, internal tooling, research, travel booking, job pipelines, etc., that inefficiency compounds really fast. I came across something called ego lite which apparently takes a different approach: isolated sessions per task, reusable login state, better page snapshots, JS-level orchestration so agents can chain actions instead of calling tiny tools one by one. they're claiming 20-50% faster completion on comparable tasks which honestly if true is not a small number when you're paying per token per call. idk maybe I'm in the weeds on this and most companies aren't at the scale where it bites yet. but it feels like one of those things where by the time people notice the bill, the architecture decisions are already locked in. the smartest model running in a bad environment is still a slow expensive agent. Anyone else actually tracking execution efficiency as a real cost metric or is it still mostly vibes and benchmarks out there? submitted by /u/babyb01 [link] [留言]

Pretty basic question, I’m curious to know what the most useful thing you’re using AI for? Are you using things like Claude cowork for tasks, Codex or Claude code for programming, script writing, homework? Do you use it as a regular chat for companionship, are you using it for life advice? Really just curious how individuals are finding it useful to them Thanks submitted by /u/thomas_unise [link] [留言]

sit down because this is going to bother you. cast your mind back 18 months. deepseek dropped and the internet lost its mind. "china just ended openai." it was everywhere. people were running it locally, posting benchmarks, losing sleep over geopolitics. then... nothing. it just kind of stopped being talked about. it didn't lose. it didn't win. it just... evaporated from the conversation. sora. remember sora? openai dropped that video generation demo and we were all convinced cinema was dead, hollywood was cooked, every creative job on earth had 18 months left. there were congressional hearings being threatened. think pieces everywhere. and now? when's the last time you actually heard someone say the word sora? not in a demo. in real life. used by a real person. i'll wait. github copilot was supposed to make every programmer 10x more productive. there were developers posting that they'd never write code from scratch again. entire job categories were being eulogised in real time. and now most developers i know have a complicated and slightly embarrassed relationship with it, like someone who got really into a mlm for three months and doesn't want to bring it up. llama was going to democratise ai forever. open source was going to eat everything. the big labs were cooked because you could run intelligence locally on a macbook. and you still can. but do you? does anyone you know actually do that regularly? it became a thing that's theoretically amazing and practically used by like eleven people on hacker news. cursor was the future of coding. perplexity was going to kill google search. both are still around, both are fine, both have paying customers. neither changed anything at the level the discourse suggested they would. here's what i think actually happened. we were living through a hype cycle so fast and so layered that each new thing would go through the entire arc - discovery, mania, backlash, abandonment - in about six weeks. and because the next thing arrived be

if youve been on the internet long enought you probably know vommitedthoughts a person that created the mimic irl and he can talk to it and it replies very human like, so ive been wanting to make my own chatbot like that called kira but idk how my last experience with python chatbots failed since it was SO dumb and it started talking to itself so how do i make my own chatbot that i can constimize its personality ?? submitted by /u/i_am_X-Kira [link] [留言]

If you’re a full-stack engineer or technical architect willing to learn production-grade enterprise agents, you need architecture, security, and type-safe systems. That’s why we built AgentSwarms.fyi —the ultimate hands-on educational platform for teaching agentic AI and multi-agent workflows. 🚀 The Core AgentSwarms Ecosystem: Real-World Architectures: Skip the generic hello-world loops. Learn production-grade systems like human-in-the-loop validation, automated multi-platform content multiplexers, and secure code-sandbox environments. Deterministic Cloud Guardrails: Deep dives into multi-cloud token economics, dynamic cost-optimized routing, and model evaluation metrics. Grassroots Engineering Focus: No corporate marketing fluff. Just raw, practical code patterns designed to bridge the gap between fragile prototypes and stable cloud deployments. 💣 The New Drop: 60+ Browser-Native TypeScript Notebooks We just completely re-engineered our learning workspace. We’ve added 60+ fully interactive TypeScript Notebooks running 100% natively in your browser. No pip install dependency hell, no local Docker setup, and zero environment friction. Read the architecture, tweak the system prompts or Zod schemas, hit play, and watch the streaming terminal execute live across the five absolute best frameworks in the ecosystem: 🟢 LangChain.js (Fundamentals & Middleware Guardrails) 🔀 LangGraph.js (Cyclic Graphs & Stateful Orchestration) 💾 LlamaIndex.ts (Sentence-Window Retrieval & RAG Triad Evals) ⚡ Vercel AI SDK (Streaming UI Integration) 🤖 OpenAI Agents SDK (Lightweight, low-boilerplate loops) Stop passively scrolling through video courses. Open a canvas, break the graph nodes, and start compiling real multi-agent swarms. 👉 Dive in for free: agentswarms.fyi/learn submitted by /u/Outside-Risk-8912 [link] [留言]

eh, too late brah.. submitted by /u/TrisolaranPrinceps- [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/JackieBoy77 [link] [留言]

One of the clearest breakdowns for average people like me to understand how AI actually works, and some interesting further information to'boot. https://rogerthatcleansignal.carrd.co/ Discuss. submitted by /u/Leading_Pollution131 [link] [留言]

As the title says, just curious if there are devices that two people speaning different languages can wear and talk in real time without needing any human interpreter? submitted by /u/fearofunknown1 [link] [留言]