标签：#ia

Introduction Hello,I'm currently a data science student and this is my understanding of git workflow, from creating folders on my local computer to adding files, pushing and having them on my github repository. Working directory This is the active folder created in the local machine which will have all the files related to the project. We can create a folder on terminal by following the steps, -Launch your terminal -cd desktop :this is to ensure that we are in the desktop folder -mkdir data :this is to create a new folder on desktop -touch school.py :this is to create a python file inside the data folder -git status :this tells us the repository we are working in Staging This allows us to prepare to save the files that we have created. We can save a specific file or all files at once. For example;assuming we have three different files eg.schools.py ,books.py ,teachers.py -git add . :this saves all the files in the folder -git add schools.py :this saves only the schools files Commit This allows us to save the files from the staging step. .git commit -m "creating schools files" .git commit :saves the files to git hub .-m :this is a message that explains the change that happens in the folder ." " :this briefly explains the change that happened Push This allows us to move our work from our local computer to git hub. git push origin main ;origin points us to our online git hub while main is the name of the branch where we are making the changes

The Nvidia Cloverleaf data center partnership announced on Friday tells you where the real constraint in AI has moved, and it is not the chip. TechCrunch reported that Nvidia has taken a minority stake in Cloverleaf , a company founded in 2024 that raised $300 million that year and sits between utility companies and data centers, arranging power and site infrastructure. Nvidia did not buy a chip designer. It bought a piece of the electricity supply chain. That reframing is worth thinking about if you build software from anywhere outside a well-supplied grid. 🔌 The bottleneck moved from silicon to substations Read the deal literally. Cloverleaf's product is not compute. It is power sourcing and site infrastructure — the interconnect agreements, the substations, the land next to a utility that can actually deliver load. Nvidia buying into that layer is an admission that shipping more GPUs does not help if nobody can plug them in. This was not a one-off either. The same week, per the reporting: Deal Announced Reported size What Nvidia bought into SB Energy (OpenAI-linked, Ohio) 17 Aug 2026 $1.5 billion Data center project with an energy parent Cloverleaf 21 Aug 2026 Several hundred million (WSJ), minority stake (Reuters) Utility-to-data-center power intermediary Terms were not disclosed by either company, so treat the dollar figures as press reporting rather than filings. Key takeaway: When the company that sells the shovels starts buying the mines, the scarce input is no longer shovels. For AI in 2026, the scarce input is grid capacity. 💰 The circular money problem you should price in Here is the part I would not skip over. Nvidia sells GPUs to data centers. Nvidia is now also investing in the companies that build and power those data centers . Some of that capital flows back as GPU orders. That is not illegal or even unusual in capital-intensive industries. Telecom vendors financed carriers for decades. But it has a specific consequence for you as a buyer of compute:

¿Alguna vez refinaste una nota durante horas — redactando, puliendo, dándole estructura — y un ingest posterior la sobrescribió silenciosamente, como si tus horas nunca hubieran existido? Si usas LLMs para mantener una base de conocimiento, probablemente ya sentiste ese dolor: la IA genera contenido excelente, pero cuando tú lo mejoras a mano, no siempre respeta tus ediciones. Este artículo te muestra cómo resolvimos ese problema en agnosticBrain , un vault de conocimiento basado en el patrón LLM Wiki de Andrej Karpathy, al que agregamos tres capas de ownership en lugar de las dos originales. El contexto: LLM Wiki, la propuesta de Karpathy En abril de 2026, Andrej Karpathy publicó su gist sobre LLM Wiki , una idea elegante para bases de conocimiento personales: The wiki is a persistent, compounding artifact. The cross-references are already there. The contradictions have already been flagged. The synthesis already reflects everything you've read. La idea: en lugar de RAG clásico (recuperar fragmentos crudos en cada consulta), el LLM compila y mantiene una wiki persistente — un conjunto de notas markdown interconectadas que vive entre tú y tus fuentes. Obsidian es el IDE, el LLM es el programador, y la wiki es el código. La arquitectura tiene dos capas : raw/ — Tus fuentes crudas. Inmutables. El LLM solo lee. wiki/ — Conocimiento compilado. El LLM lo escribe y mantiene todo. Tú lo lees. Suena perfecto, ¿no? El LLM hace todo el trabajo pesado. Pero hay un punto ciego. El GAP: el conocimiento refinado a mano no estaba protegido El patrón de Karpathy asume que tú nunca escribes en la wiki — el LLM la mantiene por completo. En la práctica, eso no se sostiene. Eventualmente quieres intervenir: corregir una síntesis, afinar una conclusión, documentar algo que aprendiste por experiencia y que ninguna fuente captura. ¿Y qué pasa entonces? Los sistemas de conocimiento con IA tienen un punto ciego: no distinguen entre conocimiento generado automáticamente y conocimiento refina

An AI assistant will write you a query in ten seconds, the query will run, and the number that comes back will look completely reasonable. This page gives you the five checks that tell you whether that number is right. They take about two minutes, they need no tools beyond the database you already have, and they catch the four mistakes AI-written SQL actually makes. The order matters. The checks are arranged cheapest first, so the first one costs a single row count and the last one costs a short conversation. Most wrong queries fall to the first two. The short version. A query that runs has only passed a grammar check. The number is right when the rows, the filters and the denominator match the question you asked. The database only takes a query as far as the first gate. Why a query that runs can still be wrong Before the list: what do you think the database actually checks when it accepts a query? Grammar. That is the whole list. Spell a table name wrong and you get an error. Sum the wrong column, join in a way that doubles rows, or filter after grouping when the question needed it before, and you get a clean result set with a wrong number in it. Every mistake on this page is valid SQL. AI assistants add one specific difficulty: their queries are fluent. The aliases are tidy, the formatting is clean, and the shape looks like something a careful person wrote. Fluency reads as correctness, and it is not the same thing. Treat an AI query the way you would treat a first draft from a new colleague: with respect, and with the row counts open. The table the examples run on Everything below runs on one small shop dataset, so every number can be checked by hand. Thirteen orders in July, five customers, and a refunds table where two orders were refunded in two parts. Eleven of the thirteen orders are completed; one is refunded, one is pending. There is also a staff_accounts table listing internal accounts, and it contains one NULL row, because real lookup tables usually do.

By Michael Nocito , data analyst · Published August 8, 2026 By the end of this page you will be running real SQL against a real database with nothing installed, and you will know which of the free browser tools suits which job. You will also know the thing none of them puts on the front page: some of them run entirely inside your browser, and some upload whatever you paste to a stranger's server. That difference decides what you are allowed to practise on. Here is what to actually do today. If you want a database already loaded and questions already written, open sql-practice.com . If you want to create your own tables and share the result with someone, open DB Fiddle . Both start working immediately with no account. The short version: browser-only tools keep your data on your machine, server-backed tools do not, and neither kind is the right place for anything from work. Where the data goes is the one idea that should drive your choice, so it gets the picture. The original carries a diagram here. In words: Two panels side by side, each drawn as a laptop outline containing a browser window. In the left panel a small data box sits inside the browser window, with a short circular arrow looping back into itself, showing the data never leaves the laptop. In the right panel the same data box has a long arrow leading out of the laptop, across a gap, and into a separate server rack drawn beyond the laptop's edge, with a copy of the data box now sitting in the rack as well. The original box remains, showing the data has been copied out rather than moved. Every tool below was opened and checked on 8 August 2026. These sites change often, so the descriptions describe what was actually on screen, and anything I could not confirm by looking is not claimed here. 1. Run your first query, right now Before the explanation: what do you think has to exist on your computer for a SELECT statement to return rows? The honest answer is nothing at all, and that surprises people who have sp

By Michael Nocito , data analyst · Published August 8, 2026 By the end of this page you will have a real database sitting on your own computer, with 11 tables, 3,503 tracks and 412 customer invoices in it, and you will have run a query that proves every table arrived intact. Then you will run a join across two of those tables, which is the thing a single spreadsheet can never teach you. It takes about five minutes and costs nothing. Here is what to actually do today. Download the Chinook database file, open it in DB Browser for SQLite, and run one query that counts the rows in every table. If the counts match the ones printed below, you have a working practice environment and you can stop shopping for one. The short version: get Chinook_Sqlite.sqlite , open it, count the rows, then join two tables. Northwind and Sakila are the other two names you will see, and there is a table further down saying when each is the right pick. The reason a sample database beats the CSV you already have is one idea, so it gets the picture. The original carries a diagram here. In words: Two panels side by side. The left panel holds a single grid of rows and columns, standing alone with nothing attached to it. The right panel holds four smaller grids arranged around each other. A highlighted column at the edge of each small grid is joined by a solid line to a matching highlighted column on a neighbouring grid, so all four grids are wired together into a connected shape. The left panel has no lines at all, because there is nothing for a line to reach. Every number on this page is real. I downloaded Chinook v1.4.5 and Northwind on 8 August 2026 and ran each query with SQLite 3.51.1. The counts, the outputs and the row multiplication are what came back, not what should have come back. If you have no database software at all yet, how to set up a SQL database is the fifteen-minute version of that step, and this page picks up right after it. 1. Why one CSV is not enough Before the explanation:

"We probably need another site that's capable of heavy and super heavy launch capability."

Cheap energy, abundant land, and proximity to Beijing have turned a city in Inner Mongolia into a crucial hub for data centers.

Nvidia continues to pour money into data center development — just as AI data centers bring lots of money into Nvidia.

The DoJ said the app has made significant strides in privacy protections since the 2024 suit.

Git is a version control system. Version control, also known as source control, is the practice of tracking and managing changes to software code. Version control systems are software tools that help software teams manage changes to source code over time. Git is used for: Tracking code changes Tracking who made changes Coding collaboration Setting up a new Repository A Git repository is a folder that Git tracks for changes. The repository stores all your project's history and versions. Add files to the folder. The following describes how to set up a new repository: Git Init Initializes git user@localhost $ git init This creates a hidden folder called .git inside your project. This is where Git stores all the information it needs to track your files and history. To see which files are in your project folder, use the ls command: user@localhost $ ls To Check if Git is tracking your new files: user@localhost $ git status The files here could either be tracked or untracked:- Untracked Files Files you've created or copied into the folder, but haven't told Git to watch. Tracked Files Files that Git is watching for changes. To make a file tracked, you need to add it to the staging area. Git Staging Tells Git exactly which files you want to include in your next commit. user@localhost $ git add . Common Commands git add . Stages all new, modified, and deleted files in the current directory and its subdirectories. git add <file> Stages a specific file. git add -A (or --all) Stages all changes across the entire repository, regardless of your current folder location. git add -u Stages modifications and deletions of already-tracked files, ignoring completely new (untracked) files. git add *.txt Stages all files matching a specific pattern (e.g., all text files). Git Commit A commit is like a save point in your project. It records a snapshot of your files at a certain time, with a message describing what changed. user@localhost $ git commit -m " Describe your changes" Pushing Chan

Two years after the U.S. Department of Justice alleged that TikTok violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, it has reached a $400 million settlement.

LinkedIn says its AI slop button is working.

A few years ago, I discovered the Nostr protocol 1 thanks to Jack (Jack Dorsey) 2 . I've been using it actively ever since. I already had an interest in distributed social networks for years. I tried ActivityPub 3 for a while, but something just didn't click. Around that time, Jack started ATProto 4 within Twitter, but something felt off there too. I hadn't even bothered trying the methods that came before those anyway. It always bothered me—and many others, of course—that the internet became so centralized when the web is distributed by nature. The main reason for this was social media platforms. The trend that started with guestbooks evolved into forums, then to Friendfeed-like walls, MySpace-like platforms, and eventually Facebook and Twitter. The internet, which had a much more distributed structure with blogs prior to Facebook and Twitter, suddenly started to centralize. Due to the maintenance costs of distributed structures and unsettled systems, humanity took the easy way out and chose centralization, as always. Facebook and Twitter grew steadily, and many other platforms alongside them transformed into centralized hubs using the exact same playbook. One of the things people realized too late was that centralized power always possesses the ability to manipulate, a fact that eventually came to light through the Facebook and Twitter lawsuits and similar cases over time. Moreover, there was no such thing as account ownership in any of these centralized systems; we were essentially no different from non-paying tenants (or tenants paying with our data). As time passed, we saw what happened when the landlords started evicting people. Nowadays, even just posting anti-government content can get you kicked out of these centralized platforms in an instant, and you have absolutely no ownership rights over your data or anything else. We've actually been living in a crappy system for a long time, and this system is still going on. From the era I caught onto, ActivityPub w

When I first published Swarm on GitHub, most questions weren't about Rust or MCP. They were about timing and categorization: "We just need a lightweight gateway for multi-provider routing; agents feel like overkill." "We already run an orchestration framework; why would we replace our proxy?" This reaction highlights a false dichotomy currently plaguing the AI infrastructure ecosystem: the assumption that a gateway and an agent orchestrator must be two completely different products. In practice, teams rarely wake up needing full-blown multi-agent autonomous swarms on Day 1. But when they start with a standalone proxy, they inevitably hit a wall — patching together Python microservices, external vector state stores, MCP bridges, and ad-hoc eval scripts. Every evolution requires a rewrite. The core premise of Swarm is different: a single, pure-Rust runtime where you don't choose between a gateway and an orchestrator — you simply choose which capabilities to turn on. The AI Adoption Ladder Most engineering teams evolve their LLM stack along a predictable trajectory: Rung 1: OpenAI-Compatible Gateway (Drop-in replacement for hardcoded SDKs) └── Rung 2: Multi-Provider Fallbacks (Groq, Gemini, Ollama, vLLM via TOML) └── Rung 3: Stateful Sessions (Previous response chaining & context) └── Rung 4: Native MCP Tools (SSE + Streamable HTTP tool execution) └── Rung 5: Multi-Agent DAGs (Planner + Executor + Specialists) └── Rung 6: Built-in Evals (LLM-as-a-Judge & policy gates) You can stop at any rung and have a lean, production-grade binary. When you're ready for the next level, you change a configuration flag — not your architectural foundation. Rung 1 — Just a Low-Latency Gateway If your immediate goal is simply eliminating hardcoded API keys and single-vendor SDK locks, Swarm acts as an OpenAI-compatible drop-in front door with sub-millisecond native routing overhead. # Spin up the gateway in seconds ./kickstart/gateway_kickstart/01_launch_gateway.sh curl -X POST http://loc

This post is my submission for DEV Education Track: Build Multi-Agent Systems with ADK . Finding the perfect, thoughtful gift shouldn't feel like a chore. Whether it's for a birthday, anniversary, or holiday, we all experience gift-buying paralysis: Generic suggestions : "Just buy them a mug or a generic gift card." Budget anxiety : Falling in love with an idea only to find out it costs 3x what you planned to spend. Missing the subtle nuances : Forgetting that someone dislikes clutter, lives in a tiny apartment, or prefers practical experiences over physical objects. To solve this, I built GiftAdvisor . It is an intelligent, consumer-friendly gift recommendation system built with Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) , Gemini ( gemini-3.1-flash-lite ) , and deployed seamlessly to Google Cloud Run . Live Demo & Links Live Cloud Run App : https://gift-advisor-1008832068452.us-central1.run.app GitHub Repository : https://github.com/inusha-thathsara/Multi-Agent-Gift-Idea-Generator-with-Google-ADK What I Built GiftAdvisor transforms unstructured descriptions of a person into tailored, ranked, and strictly budget-compliant gift recommendations. Instead of dumping everything into a single monolithic prompt, GiftAdvisor splits the cognitive load across three specialized AI agents orchestrated via Google ADK: Profile Analyzer Agent : Understands the human behind the prompt (lifestyle, hobbies, aesthetic preferences, and explicit anti-preferences ). Idea Finder Agent : Brainstorms creative, thoughtful candidate gifts across multiple categories with estimated market prices. Budget Filter Agent : Audits estimated prices, filters out anything exceeding the user's hard budget limit, swaps in budget-friendly alternatives, and delivers a ranked curation. Key Highlights & Features Pure Multi-Agent Pipeline : Built using Google ADK's LlmAgent , SequentialAgent , and InMemorySessionService . Zero-Overhead Scale-to-Zero : Deployed to Google Cloud Run with min-instances=0 (scales to zero w

One broken window invites another TL;DR: Don't reuse an existing getter to bolt on new business logic from outside the object. Problems 😔 Duplicated business rules Broken encapsulation Scattered comparison logic Hidden domain knowledge Fragile refactoring Law of Demeter violation Solutions 😃 Add real behavior methods Keep comparisons inside object Pass collaborators, not primitives Reserve getters for rendering Follow tell, don't ask Refactorings ⚙️ Refactoring 027 - Remove Getters Maxi Contieri Maxi Contieri Maxi Contieri Follow Apr 18 '25 Refactoring 027 - Remove Getters # webdev # programming # beginners # java 3 reactions Add Comment 17 min read Refactoring 013 - Remove Repeated Code Maxi Contieri Maxi Contieri Maxi Contieri Follow Jun 16 '24 Refactoring 013 - Remove Repeated Code # webdev # beginners # programming # tutorial 2 reactions Add Comment 3 min read Context 💬 An object exposes a getter for one legitimate reason: some other part of the system needs to read that value, usually to display it. Getters are a code smell, but this one gets a pass, for now. Later on, you discover that you need new business logic that depends on the same value. You already have the getter, so you write a function outside the object that calls it and does the comparison itself, breaking the encapsulation principle. Someone else needs slightly different logic based on the same value. They also call the getter and write their own version of the comparison. Now two places decide what that value means , and neither of them is the object that owns it. Typical. You didn't add a second getter this time. You reused the first one, because it was already there. That's the trap. The getter existed for one reason, and you let it justify skipping the real fix: a method on the object that answers the question itself, instead of handing out the raw value for every caller to interpret on their own. Sample Code 💻 Wrong 🚫 // Food needs to show its use-by date on the shelf // label, so useByDate(

Cloudflare has recently detailed how it is using AI to transform internal engineering standards from passive documentation into an actively enforced control system across the software development lifecycle. By Craig Risi

Architecture is not a fixed choice made once; fitness is a moving target driven by changing regulations, tech, and markets. Even a sound design can silently stop fitting over time without bad calls. Spanning seven articles on context stores, gateways, and topologies, this collection treats architecture as an evolving sociotechnical craft where teams deliberately shape friction, fitness, and flow. By InfoQ

Patreon has announced a number of new and overhauled features that are designed to "build a better network - and a better internet," according to CEO Jack Conte. The Patreon roadmap includes discovery algorithm updates, platform and security improvements, and new features for both creators and fans. In a lengthy blog post, Conte outlines each […]