标签：#tex

Fabiane Nardon shares how TOTVS prepares enterprise data for token-hungry AI agents. She discusses balancing deterministic logic and non-deterministic LLMs across precision, security, and cost. Nardon details using data mesh, low-latency database architectures, semantic ontologies, and dynamic MCP tool selection to optimize context windows and reduce token overhead in transactional systems. By Fabiane Nardon

Archeologists are confronting an “unfathomable” loss as border wall construction is set to cut across ranches that are home to unique historical sites, many of which haven’t been fully studied.

We built a plugin for the GitHub Accessibility Scanner to make sure your alt text is actually accessible. Here's how it works. The post Your alt text passes automated checks. That doesn’t mean it’s any good. appeared first on The GitHub Blog .

Cloudflare is introducing WriteGuard, now in private beta, to provide fine-grained security controls for MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers. It aims to make AI agents safer by controlling their access to tools that can modify data or perform actions, rather than simply read information. By Sergio De Simone

Grafana Labs has announced general availability for two tools that let AI coding agents query live observability data during development: the gcx CLI and the Grafana MCP server. Both allow agents to pull metrics, logs, traces, SLOs, and Synthetic Monitoring results from Grafana Cloud or a self-hosted stack By Claudio Masolo

Short answer: for a small fintech product that turns reviewer voice notes into structured code findings, start with one synchronous speech-to-text file-upload adapter for MP3 and WAV, but write every upload to a tenant ledger before making the transcription request. That is usually the fastest integration because it keeps the first release small while preserving per-tenant cost visibility and a clean path to regional routing. Choice Shipping effort Tenant attribution Best fit Main constraint Direct file upload Lowest Clear with an internal ledger Short reviewer notes Bound by the selected API's request and duration limits Object storage plus async worker Medium Clear with job records Long or bursty recordings More states to operate Self-hosted transcription Highest Fully internal Strict control requirements or sustained workloads Model serving becomes your job My recommendation is the first row for the initial release. Keep the adapter replaceable, measure billed units rather than guessing from file size, and promote work to a queue only after real upload patterns justify it. The point isn't to find a universally fastest model. It is to ship weekly without losing the tenant-level evidence needed to understand margin. How should a simple speech-to-text API handle MP3 and WAV file uploads? Treat the upload as a business event, not as an anonymous call to an AI endpoint. Before sending any audio, create an internal record with tenantId , changeId , uploadId , media type, byte count, selected processing region, and a start timestamp. After transcription, add the external request identifier when one exists, the terminal status, and the billable unit reported by the selected service. A byte count is useful for capacity planning; it is not a substitute for actual billing data. That distinction matters in a multi-tenant SaaS. One tenant may submit many short WAV notes, while another submits compressed MP3 files with longer conversations. Charging, margin analysis, and abuse

The MCP 2026-07-28 specification removes the initialize handshake and session header, and adds required method and tool-name headers so gateways can route agent traffic without parsing JSON. Reaction split between developers calling it a rediscovery of REST and those arguing the standard itself was always the point. By Steef-Jan Wiggers

Originally published on Loop & Retry — field notes on building LLM agents that survive production. Here's the failure mode that surprises people who've only reasoned about agents statistically. You measure a per-step error rate — say 10% of steps produce something wrong — and you assume errors are independent, so a wrong step is a wrong step and the rest of the run is fine. Then you watch a real trajectory and see something else: step 4 gets a fact slightly wrong, step 5 reasons on top of that wrong fact and commits harder, step 6 takes an action premised on both, and by step 8 the agent is confidently executing a plan that was doomed at step 4. One mistake became five. The errors weren't independent — they were coupled through the context , and coupling is what turns a 10% step-error rate into a run that's wrong far more than 10% of the time. This is the cascade : a single fault amplifying down a single trajectory. It's distinct from the failure I wrote about in distributed retry patterns , where the problem is one bad condition hitting many workers at once — that's a blast radius, a horizontal spread. The cascade is vertical: it spreads through time within one run, because an agent's own past output is its future input. This post is about the vertical kind, why it's structural rather than bad luck, and where you can cut it. Why coupling is the default, not the exception A stateless function that fails just returns an error. An agent that fails does something worse: it writes the failure down where it can read it again. The mechanism is the same one that makes agents work at all — the transcript accumulates, and every step conditions on everything before it. That's a feature for carrying intent forward. It's also the exact channel a mistake travels down. Three ways a single fault propagates through the context: Poisoned premise. The agent derives or retrieves a wrong fact — a misparsed tool result, a hallucinated ID, a stale value — and it lands in the transcript a

Instacart introduced Blueberry, an AI-assisted incident response system that helps on-call engineers investigate production issues faster. It combines AI agents, operational data, and historical incident knowledge to generate grounded root cause hypotheses in Slack. It uses parallel subagents, MCP integrations, and incident history to reduce investigation time while keeping engineers in control. By Leela Kumili

Microsoft released a dedicated AI Gateway tier of Azure API Management in public preview, with a control plane built around models, MCP servers and tools rather than APIs. It fronts Foundry, Bedrock, Vertex AI and OpenAI behind one endpoint, with policy cards instead of XML. Architects welcomed the consolidation while questioning where the governance boundary sits. By Steef-Jan Wiggers

LaTeX is a document preparation system for high-quality typesetting, perfect for academic papers and technical docs. Many people turn to Overleaf as their go-to online editor for LaTeX, but it comes with its own frustrations. If you are tired of Overleaf being costly and always hitting the compile timed out error, this guide is for you! The full MacTeX install weighs in at a massive ~6.4GB, most of which you'll never actually use. Setting up a minimalist LaTeX environment on macOS using BasicTeX and VSCode is a much better alternative that makes your setup ~8 times smaller. It saves storage and makes it much easier to collaborate with your teammates using GitHub as a combo. Install LaTeX via Homebrew We'll use Homebrew to keep things manageable. If you don't have it, grab it at brew.sh . 1. Install LaTeX BasicTeX is the "lean" version of MacTeX. It's only ~140MB initially. brew install --cask basictex 2. Refresh your path and verify Make the TeX binaries available in your current terminal session: eval " $( /usr/libexec/path_helper ) " The default LaTeX compiler pdflatex should be available now. Verify it's working: which pdflatex pdflatex --version 3. Update tlmgr and packages tlmgr is the TeX Live Manager. To update tlmgr and all packages, run the following commands: sudo tlmgr update --self sudo tlmgr update --all 4. Install latexmk (build manager) latexmk is the "build manager" that handles multiple runs of the compiler (necessary for bibliographies and tables of contents). sudo tlmgr install latexmk Verify latexmk version: which latexmk latexmk --version 5. Install essential package collections BasicTeX is too bare-bones for real projects. Since we went minimalist, we need to grab only the packages we actually use. These three collections will cover 90% of your needs while keeping storage down. sudo tlmgr install collection-latexrecommended sudo tlmgr install collection-fontsrecommended sudo tlmgr install collection-latexextra Note: If a build fails due to a mi

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has paused new data center development until an audit has been completed.

This article presents a defense-in-depth approach for securing Model Context Protocol (MCP) deployments in production. It outlines four architectural control layers: safe execution, management infrastructure, outbound trust, and semantic integrity, arguing that production security requires enforcement beyond the gateway at the earliest trustworthy control points. By Nik Kale

Since launching last year, the startup today has more than 8 million people using the open-source or hosted version of its models, and now generates annual recurring revenue of $21 million.

My CV is a mess, but I think almost everybody got the same result over time. Lot of experiences, certifications, projects and so on. Furthermore, having his CV in LaTex is great but it can be hard to update/upgrade it when needed... Why not using something like a database to store all those elements? Well, we can use another layer or tool to deal with that, but it seems LaTex can do that as well with the pfgkeys package. The idea here is to create a really small local package offering an interface to store different kind of elements per categories. Let start with our requirement. How to put experiences? \experiencePut { devto }{ date }{ 2026 } \experiencePut { devto }{ title }{ author } \experiencePut { devto }{ summary }{ Writing article for fun and no profit } \experiencePut { devto }{ location }{ somewhere on the web } \experiencePut { devto }{ company }{ dev.to } \experiencePut { devto }{ skills }{ tex, latex, erlang, elixir, dart, flutter } \experiencePut is taking 3 arguments, the first one will be a reference to a position (e.g. devto ), the second argument will be an unique keyword (e.g. date ) and finally, the last argument will be the data to store (e.g. 2026 ). How to get this information back? \experienceGet { devto }{ date } \experienceGet { devto }{ title } \experienceGet { devto }{ summary } By creating experienceGet , where the first argument is the reference to a position (e.g. devto ) and the second one to the unique keyword previously set (e.g. date ). Then, it will return 2026 . Neat. Right? Let create our local package called map.sty . $ touch map.sty It will contain the definition of our interfaces and few mandatory elements for LaTex. Thanks to overleaf, we have now great LaTex documentation about that. \NeedsTeXFormat { LaTeX2e } \ProvidesPackage { mystore } [2026/07/24 map package] \RequirePackage { pgfkeys } pfgkeys requires a list of keys to work correctly, then the /cv/ key is created. More information can be seen on the documentation reg

Age verification is okay, but filtering is preempted by Section 230, judges find.

Traditional API gateways assume deterministic services and simple schemas - assumptions agentic AI breaks. Discover why enterprise engineering leaders are adopting AI Gateways as an evolutionary architecture seam. Centralize guardrails, model routing, agent identity, action policy, and semantic audit within a single control plane to prevent costly incidents while keeping core platforms stable. By Joe Price, Branimir Đurek, Pavlos Migkiros, Trevor Dearham

A few weeks ago, I set out to build a small portfolio project: a Streamlit app that could take any tabular dataset, understand something about its structure, and give honest guidance on how to model it. I called it ContextLens . I expected it to be a practical exercise in Python, machine learning, and deployment. What I didn't expect was how closely it would connect with the same questions I work with every day in my PhD research on context-aware intelligent systems. The problem I started with Most introductory machine-learning tutorials follow a familiar sequence: Load a CSV. Choose a model. Train it. Check the accuracy. What often gets skipped is the layer of judgment that should come before any of that: Is this actually a classification problem or a regression problem? Is the target so imbalanced that accuracy becomes misleading? Is that "ID" column secretly leaking the answer into your model? Are there duplicate rows, missing values, high-cardinality categories, or too many features for the number of available observations? Experienced practitioners make these judgments almost automatically. But that reasoning usually remains invisible—it sits in someone's head rather than inside the system, where another person can inspect it. ContextLens is my attempt to make that layer visible. Upload a dataset, and it profiles the data, flags structural risks—missingness, duplicate rows, likely identifier columns, class imbalance, and high-dimensional settings—and adapts its evaluation guidance to what it finds before training a single model. The point is not simply to train a model. The point is to ask whether the modelling process makes sense in the first place. Why I call it "context-aware" rather than "AI-powered" I was deliberate about this distinction, just as I have been throughout my PhD work, and it turned out to be the most important design decision in the whole project. ContextLens does not claim to be intelligent in the way a human expert is. It does not hide its

QCon AI New York 2026 (Dec 15-16) has opened registration at The Westin Jersey City Newport. Six tracks on production AI, chaired by Eder Ignatowicz with Faye Zhang and Wes Reisz. First sessions announced in August, full program by November. By Artenisa Chatziou

Exposing your data over MCP is the easy part. Designing a tool an agent uses well is the hard part. An agent can only use a tool it can read, so the work is shaping the tool for how the model calls it, not just for the human looking at the result. These are the techniques behind @bonnard/mcp-charts and the visualize tool. Discovery-first, so the agent stops guessing An agent that guesses your schema writes wrong queries. So the first tool the agent meets is a discovery tool. It calls visualize_read_me to load the chart options, the tool schema, and worked examples before it ever calls visualize , and an explore_schema tool to learn your tables and columns before it writes SQL. The agent reads, then acts. A small set of purpose-built tools The temptation is one tool per metric, or a single tool that takes arbitrary SQL and hopes. Both fail: too many tools blow the agent's attention budget; one firehose tool gives it no guardrails. Bonnard ships a small set, discover, query, visualize, each with a narrow, obvious job. The agent picks the right one because there are few of them and each does one thing. // a small, purpose-built set, not one tool per metric server . registerTool ( " explore_schema " , { /* list tables + columns */ }, listSchema ); addCharts ( server , { runSql }); // registers visualize_read_me + visualize Compact, honest responses A tool that returns 10,000 raw rows poisons the context window and the agent's next decision. Bonnard's responses are sized for a model to read: Row caps with a completeness flag. Results are capped and tagged partial or complete , so the agent knows whether it is looking at everything. Partial-result warnings. When results are capped, the response says so and tells the agent not to sum or average the visible rows, use a measure instead. Summaries over dumps. The chart comes back with a compact text summary the model can reason over, not just an image it cannot read. Errors that guide the next action A bare "error: invalid co